Income Tax Severed Letters - 2026-01-07

Ruling

2025 Ruling 2024-1019851R3 - CEE Ruling

Unedited CRA Tags
Subsection 66.1(6) definition of "Canadian exploration expense" paragraph (f)

Principal Issues: Whether the expenses to be incurred in respect of the proposed Exploration Program will qualify as "Canadian exploration expenses" pursuant to paragraph 66.1(6)(f) of that definition.

Position: Yes, provided that all the facts and circumstances represented in this ruling are respected.

Reasons: The text of the law and the opinion of NRCan.

2024 Ruling 2023-0997921R3 - Code 3 - XXXXXXXXXX SIFT Ruling Request

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c), 103(1), 104(7.1), 122.1(1), 197(1), 197(2), 245
exchangeable preferred units of sub LP of REIT did not replicate return on REIT units
non-application of SIFT tax to REIT’s subsidiary LP issuing exchangeable units to tax-exempt
same proportionate taxable income allocation on sub LP exchangeable units avoided circumvention of s. 104(7.1)

Principal Issues: 1. Whether New LP will be subject to SIFT tax because it has a tax-exempt partner that holds preferred units of New LP that are exchangeable for publicly traded units of the REIT?; 2. Whether interest is deductible under the intercompany note?; 3. Whether GAAR applies to the subject and proposed transactions?

Position: 1. No because there is no replication; 2. Yes because the requirements of paragraph 20(1)(c) are met; 3. No because there is likely no avoidance transaction, no abuse.

Technical Interpretation - External

9 May 2025 External T.I. 2023-0995491E5 - Mineral Resource Certification

Unedited CRA Tags
Definition of "mineral resource" in subsection 248(1)

Principal Issues: Whether NRCan can certify that the principal mineral to be extracted from the lithium-bearing spodumene deposits will be a principal mineral extracted from a non-bedded deposit.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: Positive Opinion provided by NRCan.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

25 August 2025 Internal T.I. 2023-0974491I7 F - Qualification of Shares as "Prescribed Shares"

Unedited CRA Tags
110(1)(d)(i.1); 6204(1)(a)(ii); 6204(1)(a)(iii)
where two share classes are inter-convertible, a capped liquidation entitlement for one class will cause both to be non-prescribed shares under Reg. 6204(1)(a)(iii)

Principales Questions: 1) Whether Class X shares of a given corporation meet the conditions of subparagraph 6204(1)(a)(iii) of the Regulations in the following context: (a) The Class X shares can be converted into Class Y shares and vice versa; and (b) The Class Y shares do not satisfy the conditions provided in subparagraph 6204(1)(a)(ii) of the Regulations. 2) Whether conditions of subparagraph 6204(1)(a)(ii) of the Regulations are met in respect of a class of shares when the holder of such shares is entitled to receive, on the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the corporation, an amount determined by a specified formula in the share capital of the company, and the distribution is to take place before the remaining property of the corporation is distributed among the shareholders?

Position Adoptée: 1) No. 2) No.

Raisons: 1) The conversion of Class X shares into Class Y shares does not meet the conditions of subparagraph 6204(1)(a)(iii) of the Regulations because the Class Y shares do not comply with subparagraph 6204(1)(a)(ii) of the Regulations. The fact that the Class Y shares can be converted into Class X shares at the shareholder's request does not compensate for this non-compliance. 2) The possibility for a class of shares to benefit from a liquidation entitlement before the distribution of the remaining property of the corporation is not in accordance with subparagraph 6204(1)(a)(ii) of the Regulations, as the amount received on the dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the corporation is fixed at a minimum amount by way of a formula or otherwise.