Income Tax Severed Letters - 2025-12-31

Ruling

2023 Ruling 2022-0938261R3 - XXXXXXXXXX program secured financing

Unedited CRA Tags
40(3.13), 53(2)(c)(v), 69(11), 85(1), 97(2), 97(3), 40(3.1), 96(2.7), 245
ruling that a loan from a limited partnership to an indirect limited partner is a loan rather than a distribution

Principal Issues: Application of partnership rules to proposed internal transfer of business into a new partnership for purposes of securing external financing. In particular: 1) Is the Parent Loan additional consideration for the transfer of certain assets? 2) Is the Parent Loan a distribution? 3) Is the Parent Loan part of a series? 4) Does GAAR apply?

Position: 1. No; 2. No; 3. No. 4. No.

Reasons: 1. Taxpayer provided legal opinion supporting that Parent Loan is a loan under XXXXXXXXXX law; FMV of the transferred assets equal to FMV of units acquired; and agreements are on arm's length commercial terms; 2) Parent Loan is a loan under provincial law; Parent Loan is not an amount in lieu of a distribution because LP is a newly formed partnership with no income or capital prior to the Proposed Transactions; no indirect tax benefits achieved; no intention to reduce a capital gain or increase a capital loss; Parent Loan is not a short term loan and therefore our administrative position described in CTF 2022 does not apply; 3) no series because single contribution and loans do not form a series of loans and contributions, and the Proposed Transactions do not artificially or temporarily increase ACB or ARA of a limited partnership interest in respect of the contribution; 4) Assuming a tax benefit and an avoidance transaction, there is no abuse/misuse; the Parent Loan is not a disguised distribution, nor consideration; the Proposed Transactions do not appear to result in an outcome that 97(2), 52(2)(c)(v), 40(3.13) and 96(2.7) seek to prevent or defeat the underlying rationale of those provisions, or circumvent those provisions in a manner that frustrates the OSP of those provisions. There is no deferral of tax or the creation or maintenance of tax attributes (ACB) in a manner that the applicable provisions do not contemplate or that results in a misuse or abuse of such provisions.

Technical Interpretation - External

1 October 2024 External T.I. 2023-0995471E5 - Mineral Resource Certificate

Unedited CRA Tags
Definition of "mineral resource" in subsection 248(1)

Principal Issues: Whether NRCan can certify that the principal mineral to be extracted from the lithium-bearing spodumene deposits on the property will be an industrial mineral extracted from a non-bedded deposit.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: Positive Opinion provided by NRCan.

Conference

5 December 2023 Roundtable, 2023-0995281C6 - 2023 TEI – Question C7 - Government Assistance

Unedited CRA Tags
12(1)(x)

Principal Issues: Position of the CRA following the Federal Court of Appeal decision in CAE Inc. c. Canada, 2022 CAF 178.

Position: General comments provided.

Reasons: Question of facts.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

24 June 2025 Internal T.I. 2022-0956161I7 - Criteria for application of subsection 163(2)

Unedited CRA Tags
Subsections 163(2), (2.1) and (3) of the Income Tax Act

Principal Issues: Whether the penalty in subsection 163(2) may apply to a taxpayer who makes a false statement on a request to amend a return of income.

Position: Question of fact.

Reasons: Where it is established that a taxpayer "knowingly or under circumstances amounting to gross negligence" made a false statement or omission in a return, including in a request to amend a return of income and documents to support the request, the penalty could apply at the time the return is filed. Furthermore, a liability for tax and an understatement of income are not preconditions for subsection 163(2) to apply.

10 June 2025 Internal T.I. 2023-0970361I7 - Interpretation of “controlling persons” definition

Unedited CRA Tags
Income Tax Act section 270
look-through approach in determining controlling persons of stacked discretionary trusts

Principal Issues: (1) Would CRA consider any contributor to a trust as a “settlor” for the purposes of the definition “controlling persons” in subsection 270(1)? (2) In a hypothetical scenario where an underlying discretionary trust made distributions to the top discretionary trust in a particular calendar year, would CRA consider the discretionary beneficiaries of the top discretionary trust to be controlling persons of the underlying discretionary trust in that year? (3) In the same hypothetical scenario, if the underlying discretionary trust made a distribution to the top discretionary trust in a particular calendar year and the top discretionary trust made distributions to its discretionary beneficiaries in that same year, would the answer be the same?

Position: (1) It is a question of law to be determined in light of the relevant facts and circumstances; (2) A distribution from the underlying discretionary trust to the top discretionary trust would not result in the discretionary beneficiaries of the top discretionary trust becoming controlling persons in respect of any of the discretionary trusts; (3) A distribution to the top discretionary trust and a distribution from the top discretionary trust to its discretionary beneficiaries in the same year would result in the discretionary beneficiaries of the top discretionary trust becoming controlling persons in respect of both trusts in that calendar year.

Reasons: (1) Prior position; (2) Interpretation of law; (3) Interpretation of law and the Common Reporting Standard.