Income Tax Severed Letters - 2021-11-17

Technical Interpretation - External

7 July 2021 External T.I. 2020-0848251E5 F - Donation and CEWS qualifying revenue

Unedited CRA Tags
125.7(1), 125.7(4)
gifts received by a registered charity are qualifying revenue

Principales Questions: Est-ce qu’un organisme de bienfaisance enregistré doit inclure certains dons dans le calcul de son revenu admissible aux fins de la SSUC? / Whether a registered charity have to include certain donations in the calculation of its qualifying revenue for CEWS purposes.

Position Adoptée: Oui / Yes

Raisons: Généralement, les dons ne constituent pas un poste extraordinaire et doivent être inclus dans le revenu admissible d’un organisme de bienfaisance enregistré. / Generaly, donations are not extraordinary items and are include in the registered charity’s qualifying revenue.

Conference

5 May 2021 IFA Roundtable Q. 1, 2021-0887621C6 - 2021 IFA Q1 - COVID and CRA admin relief post Sept

Principales Questions: Will the CRA extend the administrative relief provided in respect of corporate residency and permanent establishment beyond September 2020?

Position Adoptée: No. Determinations of corporate residency and permanent establishment will be made on a case by case basis post September 2020.

Raisons: See Supplemental Guidance on International Tax Issues published by the CRA on April 1, 2021.

5 May 2021 IFA Roundtable Q. 3, 2021-0888281C6 - IFA 2021 Q.3: 247(3) - C$5 M Threshold & 261(5)

Unedited CRA Tags
247(3), 261(5)(b), 261(5)(c).
the C$5M threshold in s. 247(3)(b)(ii) is to be translated into a functional currency on the basis that it is not “in respect of a penalty”
C$5M threshold is to be converted on the 1st day of the functional currency company’s taxation year in which the adjustments are made

Principal Issues: In applying subsection 247(3) with respect to “transfer pricing income adjustments” made in respect of a “functional currency year” of a taxpayer, what is the “relevant spot rate” to be used in order to convert the C$5M threshold amount stated in subparagraph 247(3)(b)(ii)?

Position: In accordance with paragraph 261(5)(b), the conversion shall be made at the “relevant spot rate” for the first day of the taxpayer’s particular taxation year.

Reasons: Interpretation of the Act.

5 May 2021 IFA Roundtable Q. 4, 2021-0887601C6 - 2021 IFA Q4 - section 247 Post Cameco

Unedited CRA Tags
247
Cameco may limit the use of s. 247(2)(d) recharacterization – and acknowledges that s. 247(2)(c) must take into account a relationship’s circumstances

Principales Questions: Can the CRA advise on how it intends to amend its administrative policies in interpreting and applying section 247 of the Act following the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision not to hear the Crown’s appeal in The Queen v. Cameco Corporation, 2020 FCA 112 upholding the Tax Court of Canada’s decision (“Cameco”)?

Position Adoptée: The CRA is currently reviewing its ongoing cases, in light of the Cameco decision. However the CRA will continue to consider the application of the re-characterization provision where appropriate, and will continue to administer and enforce paragraphs 247(2)(a) and (c) in a manner consistent with the guidance provided by the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada v. General Electric Capital Canada Inc. (2010 FCA 344).

Raisons: See below.

5 May 2021 IFA Roundtable Q. 5, 2021-0887671C6 - 2021 IFA Q5 - Applicability of 247(7)

Unedited CRA Tags
247(7)
a s. 17(8) exception for a loan by a partnership of two related Cancos to an FA does not imply a s. 247(7) exclusion of s. 247(2)
s. 17(18) exclusion for loan by related Cdn. parternship to LP did not apply for s. 247(7) purposes

Principales Questions: Would the CRA be prepared, on an administrative basis, to consider that subsection 247(7) is applicable to amounts owing by a foreign affiliate to a partnership, every member of which is a corporation resident in Canada, where all of the other conditions in subsection 247(7) are otherwise met?

Position Adoptée: No.

Raisons: As a baseline for adopting an administrative position, the CRA must be satisfied that doing so would align with the policy underlying the particular provision. It is not clear that this is the case in respect of this request. Furthermore, it would not be appropriate to take a position that disregards Parliament’s decision to limit the application of subsection 247(7) to indebtedness owed to a corporation. In this regard, we note that the partnership look through rule in subsection 17(4) was enacted (in 1999) concurrent with the introduction of subsection 17(8) and the amendment to subsection 247(7) to refer to subsection 17(8).

5 May 2021 IFA Roundtable Q. 9, 2021-0888271C6 - IFA - Q#9 - ITR Remissions

Principal Issues: How will the Income Tax Rulings Directorate determine remissions, as described in section 7 of the Service Fees Act, for rulings and pre-ruling consultations.

Position: Remissions will apply to rulings and pre-ruling consultations received by the Directorate after April 1, 2021. Information on calculating remissions is described in Appendix H of IC 70-6R11 Advance Income Tax Rulings and Technical Interpretations