Principal Issues: (1) Whether the CRA would automatically extend the filing period for the election under ss 184(3), pursuant to ss 220(3.2), if the court rejects the corporation's appeal of the reassessment of its Part I tax (which caused the excessive ss 83(2) election) and of the assessment of its Part III tax? (2) Whether the CRA would defer processing the validly made election under ss 184(3), that was filed at the same time as the corporation filed notices of objections in respect of the reassessment of its Part I tax (which caused the excessive ss 83(2) election) and of the assessment of its Part III tax, until the court rejects the corporation's appeals? (3) In a situation where a corporation files a notice of objection in respect of the reassessment of its Part I tax (which caused an excessive ss 83(2) election) as well as a valid election under ss 184(3) and the CRA reassesses the Part I tax of the corporation's shareholder (to tax a deemed dividend pursuant to 184(3)(d)(ii)), (a) whether the CRA would accept to process the notice of objection filed by the the corporation's shareholder in respect of the reassessment until the courts have finally accepted the corporation's appeal in respect of the reassessment of its Part I tax? (b) whether the CRA would accept a waiver from the corporation's shareholder and automatically reassess the Part I tax of the corporation's shareholder if the court decides in favour of the corporation?
Position: (1) No. (2) No.
Reasons: (1) It is not CRA's practice. (2) Technically, the CRA cannot defer the processing of the validly made election under ss 184(3) in light of the contradictory actions of the corporation. (3)(a) Technically, the CRA cannot defer the processing of the notice of objection filed by the corporation's shareholder in light of the contradictory actions of the corporation's shareholder and the corporation as well as the fact that there is no direct link between the reassessment of the corporation's Part I tax and the reassessment of the corporation's shareholder's Part I tax. (3)(b) The waiver should be considered inadmissible in light of the contradictory actions of the corporation's shareholder who had to approve the filing by the corporation of its election under 184(3).