Income Tax Severed Letters - 2006-05-19

Ruling

11 May 2006 Ruling 2006-0178321R3 - Travel Expenses - Travel Agents

Unedited CRA Tags
8(1)(g) 8(1)(H)

Principal Issues: Whether expenditure for travel incurred by travel agents are deductible employment expenses.

Position: Unable to Rule

Reasons: Question of Fact. The particular facts of each trip would have to be examined.

26 April 2006 Ruling 2004-0099201R3 F - GAAR Surplus Stripping

Unedited CRA Tags
245(2) 84.1 84(3) 85(1)

Principal Issues: Whether GAAR applies to proposed transactions?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The purpose of the proposed series of transactions is to convert the annual receipt of a dividend by the sole shareholder of an operating corporation (Opco) into a capital gain by converting on a taxable basis participating shares of Opco into preferred shares of Opco and transferring the said preferred shares of Opco to a newly formed holding corporation he controls. The series of transactions corresponds to a dividend stripping arrangement of Opco to which all the conditions under the GAAR applies.

2006 Ruling 2005-0155361R3 - interest deductibility - Part XIII

Unedited CRA Tags
212(1)(b)(vii) 15(2.3)

Principal Issues: whether 212(1)(b)(vii) and GAAR apply where loan to Finco and on-loan to LP and Holdco

Position: Yes and no

Reasons: although preferred shares that Holdco will acquire do not bear dividends, Holdco shares will disappear on subsequent merger immediately after share acquisition

2006 Ruling 2005-0157301R3 - Interest deductibility - payment of dividends

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c) 245(2)

Principal Issues: Is interest on Subco1 Loan used to pay dividends to Holdco deductible in these particular circumstances?

Position: Yes

Reasons: Particular fact situation

Technical Interpretation - External

18 May 2006 External T.I. 2005-0160301E5 - 6(1)(f) - Wage Loss Replacement Plan

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(a) 6(1)(f)

Principal Issues: 1.) Tax implications to an employee of benefits received under a wage loss replacement plan that is co-paid by an employer.
2.) Whether any part of an employee's contribution or benefit can be deducted where such a benefit is taxable, and if so, on what line of the individual's tax return may such a deduction be claimed.
3.) Whether the employer or insurer is responsible for providing contribution documentation used to determine available deductions to employees.

Position: 1.) Subparagraph 6(1)(a)(i) of the Act excludes from an employee's income the value of benefits derived from the contributions of an employer to a wage loss replacement plan. However, paragraph 6(1)(f) includes in employment income any benefits paid to an employee from a plan where the employer pays all or part of the premiums for the plan.
2.) The amount of the benefit included in income is reduced by the amount of contributions made by the employee provided for by subparagraph 6(1)(f)(v). The amount of taxable benefits received under a wage loss replacement plan that may be offset by employee contributions to the plan is not a deduction, but a reduction to the total amount of taxable benefits received. The responsibility for determining and substantiating the employee contributions that can be offset against the benefits rests with the taxpayer making the claim and reporting the amount on line 104 of the individual's tax return.
3.) The responsibility of providing documentation related to the contributions to or benefits received by the employee under such a plan can only be established though review of the terms of the contract between the employer and insurer for the provision of benefits and the plan documents, and is a question of fact.

18 May 2006 External T.I. 2005-0162611E5 - Motor Vehicle Taxable Benefit

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(a) 6(1)(e)

Principal Issues: In light of the MacMillan case, does a taxable benefit apply to employees who are required to take employer motor vehicles home to be available to respond to emergencies?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: An employee who uses an employer-provided motor vehicle to travel between home and work, without paying for the use, has received a benefit notwithstanding the conditions of employment that require the employee to take the vehicle home.

16 May 2006 External T.I. 2006-0179851E5 - test wind turbines

Unedited CRA Tags
1219(3) 1219(1)

Principal Issues: whether certain proposed wind turbines will qualify as test wind turbines within the meaning of Regulation 1219(3)

Position: Yes; provided project is carried out as described

Reasons: opinion from NRCan and compliance with legislation

12 May 2006 External T.I. 2006-0183861E5 - test wind turbine

Unedited CRA Tags
Reg. 1219(3)

Principal Issues: Whether a proposed wind turbine will qualify as a test wind turbine

Position: yes, if project proceeds as described

Reasons: Satisfies criteria and favourable opinion from NRCan

12 May 2006 External T.I. 2005-0159581E5 - "Approved " Status

Unedited CRA Tags
37(1)(a)(ii) 37(7)

Principal Issues: The client requested that XXXXXXXXXX . be approved as a not-for profit corporation entitled for third party payments for SR&ED.

Position: The client's letter did not contain sufficient information. General comments provided.

Reasons: The determination as to whether a particular entity can be approved can only be made following a review of a particular applicant's submission and related documentation as outlined in Application Policy SR&ED 96-10.

10 May 2006 External T.I. 2006-0169471E5 - Gift Cards given as employee awards

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(a)

Principal Issues: Whether certain gift cards available from certain retailers are non-cash or near-cash awards

Position: Gift cards are near-cash awards since they may be used to purchase goods and services up to the face value of each card.

Reasons: They are essentially equivalent to cash.

9 May 2006 External T.I. 2005-0153791E5 - capital deduction

Unedited CRA Tags
125(5.1) 181.1 181.5 256(2)

Principal Issues: 1) Can related companies choose to allocate the $ 50 million capital tax deduction in the manner set out below? 2) In allocating the $10 million capital tax deduction for the purposes of subsection 125(5.1) does a subsection 256(2) election apply? 3) Is an agreement made pursuant to subsection 181.5(2) relevant for determining the $10 million capital deduction for the purposes of subsection 125(5.1)?

Position: 1) Yes. 2) No. 3) Yes.

Reasons: 1) Subsection 181.1(2) permits the allocation of the amount among related companies. 2) Subsection 256(2) provides that an agreement under that section applies for the purposes of section 125. 3)Plain reading of subsection 181.5(4.1).

Technical Interpretation - Internal

4 May 2006 Internal T.I. 2006-0183801I7 F - 152(3.1) Normal Reassessment Period Determination

Unedited CRA Tags
152(3.1), 152(4)
normal reassessment period excludes the day of initial assessment
Brunette followed re computing normal reassessment period

Principal Issues: In the particular situation, where the day of mailing of a notice of an original assessment was May 3, 2003, when does the normal reassessment period end?

Position: May 3, 2006.

Reasons: The Interpretation Act and the decision in Brunette et al. v. The Queen, 2000 DTC 1783 (T.C.C.).

27 March 2006 Internal T.I. 2005-0142801I7 - RRIF Direct Transfers

Unedited CRA Tags
146.3(2)(e) 60(l)(v)(D)

Principal Issues: Can all direct transfers of an excess amount from one RRIF to another RRIF, where the same individual is the annuitant under both RRIFs, be transferred under paragraph 146.3(2)(e) of the Act?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The wording of 146.3(2)(e) would appear to accommodate all such transfers.