Date: 20111206
Dockets: A-91-11
A-92-11
Citation: 2011
FCA 340
CORAM: DAWSON J.A.
GAUTHIER J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
SHAPIRO
COHEN
Appellant
and
EMPRESSA CUBANA DEL TABACO
Trading also as CUBATABACO and
THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE-MARKS
Respondents
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 6, 2011.
Judgment delivered from the
Bench at Ottawa,
Ontario, on December 6, 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
DAWSON J.A.
Date:
20111206
Dockets: A-91-11
A-92-11
Citation: 2011 FCA 340
CORAM: DAWSON J.A.
GAUTHIER
J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
SHAPIRO COHEN
Appellant
and
EMPRESSA CUBANA DEL TABACO
Trading also as CUBATABACO and
THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE-MARKS
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 6,
2011)
DAWSON J.A.
[1]
These
are two appeals from a decision of the Federal Court, cited as 2011 FC 102,
383 F.T.R. 164. In this decision, a Judge of the Federal Court
allowed the appeals from two decisions of the Registrar of Trade-marks made
under section 45 of the Trade-marks Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. T-13
(Act). In the first decision, the Registrar expunged the trade-mark COHIBA
(TMA277,250). In the second decision, the Registrar expunged the trade-mark
COHIBA & DESIGN (TMA373,446). The registered owner of each trade-mark is
Empressa Cubana del Tabaco (Cubatabaco), one of the respondents to this appeal.
One appeal is brought in respect of each trade-mark. Both appeals were heard
together by this Court and a copy of these reasons will be placed in each court
file.
[2]
Two
issues are raised on these appeals. First, did the Judge err in finding that
Cubatabaco had demonstrated direct or indirect control over the character or
quality of the wares sold in Canada by its licensee, so as to benefit from the
licensee’s use in Canada? Second, did the Judge err in finding that
the registration for “manufactured tobacco for smoking and chewing”
in the statement of wares for the COHIBA trade-mark included cigars and
cigarillos?
[3]
With
respect to the first issue, we see no error of law in the reasons given by the
Judge for concluding that Cubatabaco exercised control over the character and
quality of the cigars and cigarillos sold in Canada by its
licensee under the trade-marks COHIBA and COHIBA & DESIGN. Indeed, in oral
argument counsel for the appellant acknowledged that what is being challenged is
the Judge’s application of the legal test to the facts of these cases. However,
we see no palpable or overriding error in the Judge’s appreciation of
relevant evidence or in his application of the relevant legal principles to his
findings of fact. On this appeal the appellant in effect challenges the weight
given to certain evidence by the Judge.
[4]
With
respect to the second issue, there was additional evidence before the Federal
Court, not available to the Registrar of Trade-marks, with respect to the
composition and construction of the cigars at issue. The new evidence, coupled
with the dictionary definitions of “cigar” and
“cigarillo,” supported the Judge’s conclusions that the new
evidence would have materially affected the Registrar’s decision, and
that cigars and cigarillos are manufactured tobacco for smoking thus falling
within the statement of wares for the COHIBA trade-mark. Further, we see no
palpable or overriding error in paragraph 73 of the Judge’s reasons.
[5]
For
these reasons, each appeal will be dismissed. The appellant shall pay to the
respondent Cubatabaco one set of costs in respect of both appeals.
“Eleanor R.
Dawson”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKETS: A-91-11
A-92-11
STYLE OF CAUSE: SHAPIRO
COHEN v. EMPRESSA CUBANA DEL TABACO also trading as CUBATABACO and
THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE-MARKS
PLACE OF HEARING: OTTAWA, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: DECEMBER 6, 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT BY: (DAWSON, GAUTHIER, TRUDEL JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: DAWSON J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mrs. Chantal Bertosa
Mrs.
Victoria Carrington
|
FOR
THE APPELLANT
|
Mr. Scott Miller
Mr.
Jonathan Roch
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENTS
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
Shapiro
Cohen
Barristers and
Solicitors
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE RESPONDENTS
|