The Road Ahead
Progress Against the 2000-2001 Road Ahead
| Targeted Areas for Improvement* |
Targeted Completion Date* |
Status |
On Track During 2001-2002? |
Roll Into Road Ahead 2002 and Beyond? |
Reduce the level of accounts receivable
|
2001-2002
|
- A multi-faceted strategy to address the level of accounts receivable has been developed. Elements of this strategy include nationalizing the collections workload and reducing the level of accounts more than five years old.
|
|
Yes
|
Enhanced programs for enforcing compliance and improved protection of tax base
|
2001-2006
|
- With additional resources provided by the Government, over 900 new auditors have been hired and trained. However, it will take a few years to realize the full impact of this investment. Significant work undertaken to match third-party information slips on payments made to government contractors and construction sub-contractors with revenues reported.
|
|
Yes
|
Maturing of TONI administration
|
2001-2002
|
- Introduced TONI in the remaining provinces (excluding Quebec) and territories in February 2002.
|
|
No
Fully implemented
|
Improved timeliness of corporate processing
|
2001-2002
|
- Inventories have been reduced to acceptable levels, but service standards for processing timelines revised in light of recent program experience.
|
|
Yes
|
Expanded beneficial adjustments
|
2001-2002
|
- Beneficial adjustments will be expanded to include other types of taxpayer errors after full implementation of Matching Redesign Initiative in 2004-2005.
|
N/A
|
No
Revised status
|
Modernize delivery of the excise duty and tax program
|
2001-2005
|
- First phase of the Other Levies Project implemented, including moving Workers Compensation Board and Industry Canada payments onto the standardized accounting platform and creating a Business Number for all excise accounts.
|
|
Yes
|
More convenient filing options, speedier returns processing, and paper burden reduction
|
2001-2003
|
- Implemented all key deliverables for 2001-2002 with regard to the T4 Internet filing option, GST/HST Internet filing, and Business Registration On-Line. Expanded the use of NETFILE.
|
|
Yes
|
Effective performance management targets, and service standards including standards for telephone services
|
2001-2004
|
- In step with the broader implementation of the Balanced Scorecard, work progressed on the development of Balanced Scorecard measures and indicators. However, at a corporate level, the Agency did not progress as expected, falling short in the overall phased-in implementation of the BSC (see ). We are now back on track in 2002-2003.
- Effective 2002-2003, we expect to establish a service standard for caller accessibility adapted from our internal performance standard.
|
|
Yes
|
Systematic monitoring of decisions relating to cancellation and waiving of interest and penalties for consistency
|
2001-2002
|
- Fairness registry reviewed as a first step towards implementing systematic nationwide monitoring system.
|
|
Yes
|
Improved measurement and reporting of overall compliance, particularly for certain categories of tax
|
2001-2002
|
- Developed an initial comprehensive compliance measurement framework and a proposed action plan for implementation beginning in 2002-2003.
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
On track
|
|
Mostly on track
|
|
Not on track
|
*Source: Prior year Annual Report to Parliament (2000-2001)
The Road Ahead – 2002 and Beyond
|
1. Implement multi-faceted framework for managing accounts receivable, including nationalizing collections workload (Anticipated Result 4).
2. Deploy the additional resources provided by the Government to meet the commitments for audit coverage and anticipated fiscal impact for 2002-2003 through 2004-2005 (Anticipated Results 4, 8, 9 and 10).
3. Improve the timeliness of processing T2 Corporation returns against the revised service standards (Anticipated Result 3).
4. Continue implementation of Other Levies Project as stated in the Corporate Business Plan (Anticipated Result 11).
5. Continue expansion of electronic delivery initiatives as stated in the Corporate Business Plan and Future Directions . This includes: building capability to process 75% of returns filed electronically in the next few years; and introducing T2 Internet Filing for corporation returns (Anticipated Results 3 and 11).
|
|
6. Improve performance against existing service standards; expand the scope of these standards beyond timeliness and include standards for telephone enquiries (Anticipated Result 2).
7. Fully implement a systematic, nationwide fairness monitoring program (Anticipated Result 2).
8. Finalize the framework for measuring compliance and develop appropriate indicators (Anticipated Result 5).
9. Implement Excise Act , 2001 (Anticipated Result 11).
10. Continued participation in International e-compliance and e-service committees to clarify existing policies and practices in an e-commerce world (Anticipated Result 8)
|
Attachment 1: Logic Model
This following logic model offers a roadmap showing the links between our inputs, activities and outputs that are essential to achieving our anticipated results in support of our expected outcome. It also shows how these fit into the Agency's overall strategic outcomes. This logic model is the foundation of our performance report card which summarizes our performance against each anticipated result.
Attachment 2: Service Standards in Tax Services
| |
Service |
Service Standard |
Target |
Results 1999-2000 |
Results 2000-2001 |
2000-2001 Compared to Target |
Results 2001-2002 |
2001-2002 Compared to Target |
Tax Services – Client
|
1. Counter-service wait time
|
20 minutes (except during peak periods)
|
20 minutes (except during peak periods)
|
Not available
|
86% served within 20 minutes
|
|
85% served within 20 minutes
(see note)
|
|
2. Processing Visitor Rebate applications
|
4-6 weeks
|
100%
|
95%
|
95%
|
|
95%
(see note)
|
|
3. Reimbursements to duty-free shops
|
5 working days
|
100%
|
99%
|
99%
|
|
99.8%
|
|
4. Responding to client-requested adjustments (T1)
|
8 weeks
|
100%
|
7 weeks
|
7 weeks
|
|
7 weeks
(see note)
|
|
5. Compensation to duty free shops
|
30 days
|
100%
|
99%
|
99%
|
|
90%
|
|
6. Validating magnetic media test tapes
|
30 days
|
100%
|
96%
|
96%
|
|
98%
(see note)
|
|
7. Problem Resolution Program
|
Acknowledged within 24-48 hrs. Resolution within 15 days
|
100%
100%
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
100%
76%
(see note)
|
|
8. Processing fairness requests related to accounts receivable and trust accounts programs
|
4-6 weeks
|
90%
|
91%
|
91%
|
|
91%
(see note)
|
|
9. Advance income tax rulings to taxpayers
|
Within 60 days
|
100%
|
108 days
|
54 days
|
|
66 days
|
|
10. Technical interpretations to taxpayers
|
Within 90 days
|
100%
|
121 days
|
105 days
|
|
87 days
|
|
11. Applications to register pension plans
|
Deemed registration within 60 days
Complete review in 180 days
|
80%
80%
|
Over 80%
89%
|
Over 80%
89%
|
|
90%
89%
|
|
12. RSP and RIF applications
|
Within 60 days
|
80%
|
68%
|
RSP 68%
RIF 78%
|
|
RSP 73%
RIF 78%
|
|
13. Response to telephone enquiries regarding deferred income plans
|
Within 24-48 hours
|
100%
|
Over 80%
|
Over 80%
|
|
100%
(see note)
|
|
14. Response to written enquiries regarding deferred income plans
|
Within 60 days
|
80%
|
59%
|
68%
|
|
70%
|
|
15. Issue statements of account to corporations on a monthly basis (new)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
Returns Processing
|
16. Processing T1 individual income tax returns (paper)
|
4-6 weeks
|
4-6 weeks
|
5 weeks
|
4 weeks
|
|
4 weeks
(see note)
|
|
17. Processing T1 individual income tax returns (EFILE, TELEFILE, NETFILE)
|
2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
2 weeks
(see note)
|
|
18. Processing T3 trust returns
|
Within 4 months
|
95%
|
67%
|
62%
|
|
46.1%
|
|
19. Processing GST/HST returns
|
21 days
|
100%
|
94%
|
91%
|
|
98%
|
|
20. Processing T2 corporation income tax returns
|
75% in 50 calendar days,
90% in 90 calendar days
|
75% in 50 calendar days,
90% in 90 calendar days
|
51% in 90 days
|
89% in 90 days
|
|
45% in 50 days
61% in 90 days
(see note)
|
|
21. Processing EFILE agent applications
|
30 days
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
|
91%
(see note)
|
|
|
Review
|
Claims – SR&ED tax incentives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22. Refundable claims – New combined target (unaudited and audited)
|
120 days
(see note)
|
90%
|
|
|
|
90%
(see note)
|
|
Previous standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
60 days
|
100%
|
84%
|
80%
|
|
|
|
Audited
|
120 days
|
100%
|
81%
|
81%
|
|
|
|
23. Non-refundable claims – New, combined target (unaudited and audited)
|
365 days
(see note)
|
90%
|
|
|
|
84%
(see note)
|
|
Previous standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
|
120 days
|
100%
|
85%
|
84%
|
|
|
|
Audited
|
1 year
|
100%
|
58%
|
64%
|
|
|
|
24. Claimant-requested adjustments to refundable claim (new)
|
240 days
|
90%
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
86%
|
|
Review
|
25. Claimant requested adjustments to non- refundable claim (new)
|
365 days
|
90%
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
Not available
|
81%
|
|
Claims – Video and film tax credits
26. Refundable claims – unaudited
|
60 days
|
100%
|
84%
|
73%
|
|
68%
|
|
27. Refundable claims – audited
|
120 days
|
100%
|
77%
|
75%
|
|
57%
|
|
|
|
Met or exceeded target
|
|
Target mostly met (at least 95%)
|
|
Target not met
|
|
New or modified service standard
|
Explanatory notes
Standard 1: Information is based on limited input from Client Service Rating Cards and is not statistically valid.
Standard 2: Information is based on an estimate.
Standard 4: The standard applies to straightforward client requested adjustments, that is, those that pertain to workflows that do not involve time waiting for substantive information in order to be resolved.
Standard 6: Information is based on 705 test submissions done in January and February 2002.
Standard 7: Information is based on a sample and is not statistically representative.
Standard 8: Information is based on a small sample size and is not statistically valid.
Standard 13: Information is based on an estimate; target was revised from 80% to 100% starting 2001-2002.
Standard 16: Information is based on T1 Statistical Sample File.
Standard 17: Information is based on T1 Statistical Sample File.
Standard 20: The standard changed during the year from 85% within 25 days to 75% within 50 days. The standard that had been set before implementation was revised following a review conducted after one full year of running the new system for processing T2 returns.
Standard 21: The result is based on an estimate and sampling; the data is weak.
Standard 22: The SR&ED service standards for unaudited and audited refundable claims, previously set at 60 days and 120 days respectively, have been combined into one standard for refundable claims, namely 120 days.
Standard 23: The SR&ED service standards for unaudited and audited non-refundable claims, previously set at 120 days and 1 year respectively, have been combined into one standard for non-refundable claims, namely 365 days.
New Service Standards for 2002-2003
| |
New standards and related targets |
Tax Services
|
Terminations of registered pension plans within 12 months
|
85%
|
Amendments to registered pension plans within 270 days
|
80%
|
Approval of eligible contributions to registered pension plans within 270 days
|
80%
|
Registration of education saving plans within 60 days
|
85%
|
Improvements to Existing Service Standards for 2002-2003
| |
Improvements to existing standards in 2002-2003 |
Tax Services
|
Counter wait-time – Development of consistent monitoring and reporting method
|
Problem Resolution Program – Development of consistent monitoring and reporting method
|
Processing fairness requests – Efforts will be directed to improving the quality of monitoring and performance data
|
Target for deemed registrations of registered pension plans within 60 days will be raised to 85%
|
Target for complete review of registrations of registered pension plans within 180 days will be raised to 85%
|
Processing T3 returns in 4 months – Working to improve service delivery through increased automation
|
- Date modified:
- 2002-11-07