Corporate Management and Direction
Rating System
|
|
Anticipated results met
Rating is based on good data quality – Performance rating based on management judgement supported by an appropriate level of accurate information (including management estimates) obtained from reliable sources or methods
|
|
Anticipated results mostly met
Rating is based on reasonable data quality – Performance rating based on management judgement supported, in most cases, by an appropriate level of accurate information (including management estimates) obtained from reliable sources or methods
|
|
Anticipated results not met
Rating is based on weak data quality – Significant gaps in robustness of performance information; performance rating based on management judgement supported by entirely or predominantly qualitative information from informal sources or methods
|
Variance
|
|
Year-over-year performance improved for Managing the Compliance Continuum
|
|
Year-over-year performance remained unchanged for Managing the Compliance Continuum
|
|
Year-over-year performance declined for Managing the Compliance Continuum
|
|
|
Performance exceeded expectations for year 2 of 5 for Innovating for the Future
|
|
Performance on track with expectations for year 2 of 5 for Innovating for the Future
|
|
Performance did not meet expectations for year 2 of 5 for Innovating for the Future
|
- Date modified:
- 2002-11-07
