Articles
Pennal, "Canadian Taxation of Non-Resident Insurers", 1989 Canadian Tax Journal, July-August issue, p. 1035
Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
---|---|---|
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 138 - Subsection 138(9) | 0 |
Subsection 2400(1)
Canadian Investment Fund
Paragraph (a)
Subparagraph (a)(ii)
Clause (a)(ii)(B)
See Also
Independent Order of Foresters v. The King, 2023 TCC 123
The taxpayer was a Canadian resident fraternal benefit society and a life insurer providing fraternal benefits, e.g., accident and sickness (“A&S”) benefits, and individual life insurance to its members.
The “World Surplus Assets” of the taxpayer were investment assets that were determined to be in excess of that needed for its life insurance divisions to have capital that was a comfortable multiple (around 3.1 X) of the minimum needed to be able to satisfy any claims that might be made against them. One of the issues addressed was whether the taxpayer was required to include its World Surplus Assets in computing its Canadian investment fund (CIF). This issue turned on whether the World Surplus Assets were “used or held in the course of carrying on an insurance business” as per the CIF definition.
Biringer J accepted the testimony of the taxpayer’s expert that indeed the World Surplus Assets represented assets that were in excess of those required to maintain the required margin of safety, so that, under the Ensite test, such assets were not required to be held in the life insurance business to avoid its destabilization. Furthermore, as a factual matter, the World Surplus Assets (which were managed in a separate fund) were not used or held in the life insurance business subject to exceptions where: such assets were used at any time in the year to top-up the capital of any division; they did not appear in the unconsolidated balance sheet of the taxpayer; and assets that the taxpayer had not established to have not been used to fund intangible assets used in the insurance businesses.
Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
---|---|---|
Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Regulation 2401 - Subsection 2401(2) - Paragraph 2401(2)(d) | Foresters could reduce its taxable life insurance income by allocating assets under Reg. 2401(2)(d) to its exempt accident and sickness insurance business | 389 |
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 149 - Subsection 149(4) | s. 149(4) did not deem the non-life businesses of the insurer not to exist | 327 |
Investment Property
Cases
Munich Reinsurance Co. v. The Queen, 2002 DTC 6701 (FCA)
Interest income earned by the taxpayer on tax overpayments was not income from an investment property given that there was no evidence that the taxpayer overpaid its tax instalments for the purpose of earning interest.
Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
---|---|---|
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Specific v. General Provisions | 116 |