Search - considered
Results 9761 - 9770 of 49239 for considered
TCC
931 Holdings Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1985] 2 CTC 2094, 85 DTC 388
On reading the T7W-C and the respondent's reply one may reasonably conclude that he considered only the subject propery was sold in 1974 and the fair market value of that property on December 31, 1971, Valuation Day, was $445,000. ... It appears the respondent never considered its value, or even its existence. ... Mr Walker revealed that at one point in time the appellant considered converting the property to residential use and selling the property as such. ...
FCTD
William Rachman v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1985] 1 CTC 292, 85 DTC 5220
Would you please confirm the above by signing this letter in order that my right to option could be considered at an end and the transaction can be terminated as described above. ... It is to be assumed that the landlord in this case assigned her business to the limited company for some good reason which she considered to be of an advantage to her. ... He felt the operation of Royal Tower should be considered his operation, not that of the company. ...
TCC
William M Kerr, Gail Ann Forbes v. Minister of National Revenue, [1984] CTC 2071, 84 DTC 1094
The following criteria should be considered: the profit and loss experience in past years, the taxpayer’s training, the taxpayer’s intended course of action, the capability of the venture as capitalized to show a profit after charging capital cost allowance. ... When what preceded 1977 and what followed 1978 is carefully considered, I believe one is driven to the conclusion that in these two years the appellants were not in the first class. ... These appeals have been considered from the perspective of whether, even though the conclusion is that the appellants were not in the first class in 1977, could they be regarded as being there in 1978? ...
TCC
DR John L McCans v. Minister of National Revenue, [1984] CTC 2286, 84 DTC 1270
Counsel for the appellant suggested that accounting was a pertinent and an important factor to be considered in the determination of the issue. ... Counsel for the appellant concluded that the amounts in issue could not, by any standard, be considered as taxable income to the appellant in any year. ... In assessing the appellant in 1980, the Minister could have and should have considered and given effect to the ceiling payment clauses of the University contract in his computation of the appellant’s 1977 and 1978 true taxable income. ...
TCC
Tremblay v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 100
[Emphasis added.] [40] If it includes no personal element and is clearly commercial, the taxpayer's activity is considered a source of business or property income. ... Uh, I went a bit farther, I even went into the plants, we promised to exchange samples... [22]- When asked about the cities that were considered potential clients, Mr. Tremblay said: [translation] Yes, I met with people, we talked, we exchanged calls, we wanted to see each other, we exchanged... documents that I had, interests.... [23]- When asked about the companies that were considered potential clients, Mr. ...
T Rev B decision
Nomad Sand & Gravel LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2035, 82 DTC 1070
In a unanimous decision, the Court held: The credit notes could not be considered apart from the transactions out of which they arose, in which they represented part of the consideration for the purchase of used cars, under executed contracts. Even if considered by themselves they could not be considered as unenforceable for indefiniteness. ... Further, had the Board considered that the gravel pit was a mine, it could not have allowed a 50% capital cost allowance on the loader as a Class 22 asset. ...
T Rev B decision
John Eldon Martin, George W Martin v. Minister of National Revenue, [1980] CTC 2043, 80 DTC 1052
According to the respondent the fair market value on December 31, 1971, was $1,346,000 and the difference of $384,088 must be considered as interest and consequently as income for the appellant, despite the clause of the deed of sale to the effect that no interest was payable until the land had been developed, with then an interest of 8%. ... That is no good. 3.04 The terms of the second tender (Exhibit A-3) were considered as satisfactory. ... Hence the objective facts related to the commercial transaction must be considered first. ...
TCC
White v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 2890, 97 DTC 1108
Alternatively the Minister submits that even if the expenses and legal fees can in some way be considered as relating to a business operation, the expenses were certainly not incurred for the purposes of earning income from that business and consequently are not deductible. ... The delictual act cannot in that case be considered as being necessary for carrying on the trade or profession. ... Moreover, in my opinion, the $25,000 lump sum payment provided for in the Decree Nisi cannot be considered as alimony paid on a periodic basis. ...
FCTD
Minister of National Revenue v. Moss, [1998] 1 CTC 283, 98 DTC 6016
In Satellite Earth, MacKay J. reviewed the factors to be considered by a court on a s.225.2(8) review of a jeopardy collection order. ... A business loss for the respondent’s re-possession of 2165 Taylor and capital cost allowance claims for that and the 52 Dumbarton property were also disallowed because the applicant considered them inventory. ... The first is that when the circumstances surrounding the section 160 assessment are considered, which in the respondent’s view are necessary to meet the Minister’s disclosure requirements, the issuance of the jeopardy order was not warranted. ...
TCC
Skidmore v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2619, 98 DTC 1135
In order to be considered an asset of the active business, such assets must have been employed or risked in the business. ... For an amount set aside as a reserve to be considered a backup asset used in the business, as claimed by the Appellants, there must be a rational relationship between the amounts being held by the taxpayer and reasonably determined reserves. [19] Two of the reasons advanced by the Appellants for the amounts allegedly held for that purpose were the risk of cancellation of the Crown contract and repayment of the grant and second, the potential repayment of advances in the event of a crop failure or the production of seedlings of substandard and therefore unacceptable quality. [20] First, with respect to repayment of the Crown grant, the Appellant, Skidmore, himself considered the possibility to be remote. ... The phrase “substantially all” has also been considered by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in 85956 Holdings Ltd. v. ...