Search - considered

Filter by Type:

Results 8471 - 8480 of 49144 for considered
FCA

Canada v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., 2002 DTC 6742, [2002] 3 F.C. 170, 2002 FCA 98

It considered that and simply ordered dismissal "with costs" without any exceptional terms. ...
FCA

Peach v. Canada, 2016 FCA 173

At the hearing of this appeal, both parties agreed that in the Court below, it was taken for granted that there was a source of income and all expenses had been incurred to earn business income. [5]                Under section 67, the Judge, without saying why, considered globally whether the expenses were reasonable and accepted that, as set out in the Minister’s assessment, some of the expenses should be allowed to the extent they matched the appellant’s commission income. ...
TCC

Ahmad v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 113 (Informal Procedure)

In addition, she worked full days every other Sunday, more or less, throughout that year. [3]              Her original claim included significantly more amounts as she reduced her claim before coming to Court seeking the tuition tax credit. [4]              In determining whether her attendance should be considered full-time or part-time, she sought to include travel time to her Buffalo days, which I do not think is appropriate to consider as part of attendance, whether full-time or part-time. [5]              She indicated that her best estimate was that she spent two or three hours in total at her courses and course work and studies and readings, five work days a week. ...
TCC

898673 Ontario Inc. v. The Queen, docket 98-537(GST)I (Informal Procedure)

When apprised of this testimony, Pratt indicated that this was a taxable supply (apparently not disputed by the Appellant) and that had she been aware of that fact at the time of the reassessment, she would not have reversed that portion of the GST remitted which she believed reflected employment income. [5]      At the conclusion of the evidence and after due consideration, MacMillan considered the Appellant's position with respect to its appeal and informed the Court that given the circumstances: "I think you should throw it out, Your Honour". [6]      Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. ...
TCC

Moughtin v. The Queen, docket 98-43(IT)I (Informal Procedure)

Nonetheless, the Appellant did not report either sum in his 1995 income tax return, nor did he file an amended 1995 return, although at all times he considered them wages and actively continued to take that position throughout 1996. [5]      It remains his position but he believes that his employer should have paid the withholdings that represent the difference between $4,000.00 per month and approximately $3,000.00 per month. [6]      Thus, on the evidence, the Appellant deliberately and knowingly failed to report the income in question contrary to section 150 of the Income Tax Act. [7]      Therefore he is liable for the penalties assessed under section 163(2) of the Income Tax Act. [8]      The appeal is dismissed. ...
TCC

Richmond v. The Queen, docket 97-1243-IT-I (Informal Procedure)

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: [6] This issue was considered by Judge Rip in Soper v. ...
TCC

Smith v. The Queen, docket 97-2970-IT-I (Informal Procedure)

This is a benefit for which the company pays a monthly premium to the Maritime Life Insurance Company and is, under Revenue Canada rules, considered a taxable benefit. ...
TCC

Shanahan v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 530 (Informal Procedure)

  (1) There shall be included in computing the income of a taxpayer for a taxation year as income from an office or employment such of the following amounts as are applicable:   (a) the value of board, lodging and other benefits of any kind whatever received or enjoyed by the taxpayer in the year in respect of, in the course of, or by virtue of an office or employment,   [4]               Unfortunately the Appellant’s former employer did not inform the Appellant that he would be considered to have a benefit from employment in relation to this trip nor was this benefit from employment included on his T4 slip. ...
TCC

Petrowsky v. The Queen, docket 2001-4495(IT)I (Informal Procedure)

ANALYSIS [8]            The Appellant testified that in the 1998 and 1999 taxation years he incurred various expenses in an attempt to establish a profitable snowmobile rental business. [9]            I have carefully considered the Appellant's testimony and I have concluded that the following additional expenses should be allowed: AMOUNTS TO BE ALLOWED Expenses:                                                               1998                                      1999                 Advertising                                                            $ 42.80                 Meals and Entertainment                    -                                          $ 149.45                 Office Expenses                                     1,214.95                 Supplies                                                  1,238.72                 Travel                                                                      75.82                     503.05 [10]          With respect to capital cost allowance the following items should be added to the C.C.A. ...
TCC

St-Fort v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 446

The disbursements are justified and considered necessary and reasonable costs for the conduct of this case. ...

Pages