Search - considered

Filter by Type:

Results 8061 - 8070 of 49139 for considered
FCTD

McClain Industries of Canada Inc. v. The Queen, 78 DTC 6356, [1978] CTC 511 (FCTD)

Obviously Maple Leaf considered these amounts as its liability to those three persons. ... Therefore he stated: So for this reason "l have not considered this exhibit, and I put it aside. ... He signed it because he considered that the unpaid commission was not rightly his and should revert to Maple Leaf. ...
TCC

Transport M.l. Couture v. The Queen, 2003 DTC 817 (TCC), aff'd sub. nom. 9044-2807 supra.

However, with respect to siblings, unless the facts indicate otherwise, generally one sibling would not be considered to have influence over another. In addition to the general factors described above, the composition of the board of directors and the control of day-to-day management and operation of the business would be considered.                                                                              ... No written management agreement had been considered necessary when ML1 was replaced by ML2. ...
EC decision

Furness Withy & Co. Ltd. v. MNR, 66 DTC 5358, [1966] CTC 482 (Ex Ct), aff'd 68 DTC 5033, [1968] CTC 35, [1968] SCR 221

In this respect the meaning of the expressions used both in Section 10(1) (c) and in Article V are thus narrower than that of the statutory provision considered in M.N.R. v. ... It read: “31. (1) For the purposes of this Act, a non-resident person’s taxable income earned in Canada for a taxation year is (a) his income for the year from all duties performed by him in Canada and all businesses carried on by him in Canada, 4 minus (b) the aggregate of such of the deductions from income permitted for determining taxable income as may reasonably be considered wholly applicable and of such part of any other of the said deductions as may reasonably be considered applicable.’’ ... The precise kind of trading to a British port, which exposed a foreign shipowner to British taxation, need not be considered here. ...
TCC

McGillivray Restaurant Ltd. v. The Queen, 2015 DTC 1030 [at at 134], 2014 TCC 357, aff'd supra

However, whatever factors are considered, they must show that a person or group of persons has the clear right and ability to change the board of directors of the corporation in question or to influence in a very direct way the shareholders who would otherwise have the ability to elect the board of directors (Silicon Graphics, [2002] FCA 260, para. [67]). ... The appellant did not challenge the relevance of the factors considered by the trial judge. ... If she considered doing it against Mr. Howard’s wishes, she would have had to consider, and be influenced by, the fact that the Appellant leased its business premises from his company and obtained all of its management and related services from his company. [62]         Had Mrs. ...
FCA

Silicon Graphics Ltd. v. Canada, 2002 DTC 7113, 2002 FCA 260

The main issue in Duha Printers was whether or not a unanimous shareholder agreement (USA) could be considered in determining that the majority shareholder did not have de jure control. ... It may be useful at this stage to summarize the principles of corporate and taxation law considered in this appeal, in light of their importance. ... It is our view that "persons" will be considered as having collectively acquired control where there is evidence that they have a common link or interest or they act together to control the corporation.     ...
FCA

The Queen v. Canada Southern Railway Co., 86 DTC 6097, [1986] 1 CTC 284 (FCA)

Subsection 31(1) read: 31. (1) For the purposes of this Act, a non-resident person's taxable income earned in Canada for a taxation year is (a) the part of his income for the year that may reasonably be attributed to the duties performed by him in Canada or the business carried on by him in Canada, minus (b) the aggregate of such of the deductions from income permitted for determining taxable income as may reasonably be considered wholly applicable and of such part of any other of the said deductions as may reasonably be considered applicable. ... Rents from property are generally considered to be income from property, but not if the owner so manages the renting as to make a business of it. ... The critical question in determining whether the dividends from the Canada Southern shares may be considered to be income from Penn Central's business carried on in Canada is not whether the dividends were used in the business. ...
TCC

Shaver v. The Queen, 2003 DTC 2112, 2004 TCC 10

Cardinal considered them as being of a training nature and the costs related thereto were claimed as current business expenses. ... Expenses are considered to be capital in nature where the training results in a lasting benefit to the taxpayer, i.e. where a new skill or qualification is acquired. Where, on the other hand, the training is taken merely to maintain, update or upgrade an already existing skill or qualification, the related costs are not considered to be capital in nature. ...
SCC

Mathew v. Canada, 2005 DTC 5538, 2005 SCC 55, [2005] 2 SCR 643

  (3) [Avoidance transaction] An avoidance transaction means any transaction   (a)  that, but for this section, would result, directly or indirectly, in a tax benefit, unless the transaction may reasonably be considered to have been undertaken or arranged primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obtain the tax benefit; or   (b)  that is part of a series of transactions, which series, but for this section, would result, directly or indirectly, in a tax benefit, unless the transaction may reasonably be considered to have been undertaken or arranged primarily for bona fide purposes other than to obtain the tax benefit ... The Tax Court judge found (at para. 233) that the transactions at issue were “basically the same” as those that were considered in OSFC Holdings Ltd. v. ... The Federal Court of Appeal then went on to disallow the benefits under the GAAR at the second stage of its analysis, where it considered the policy of the Act as a whole.   42                                In effect, the majority conducted a narrow textual analysis of the specific provisions at issue, s. 18(13)   and s. 96   (stage 1), and supplemented this by a broad purposive analysis having regard to what it considered to be a policy of the Act as a whole (stage 2).  ...
TCC

Gestion Jean-Paul Champagne Inc. v. MNR, 97 DTC 155, [1996] 2 CTC 2537 (TCC)

It was the taxpayer’s election and there was no basis upon which the Minister, absent legislative authority, could be allowed to impose the choice on him even if the taxpayer considered it beneficial. ... This was obviously a factor to be considered in interpreting Parliament’s intention. ... There are also other factors that may be considered with regard to making an election or a designation at the time of a reassessment, including the prejudice caused to the rights of the Minister or other taxpayers. ...
TCC

Bailey v. MNR, 90 DTC 1321, [1990] 1 CTC 2450 (TCC)

The phrase "adventure or concern in the nature of trade" was considered by the Exchequer Court of Canada in M.N.R. v. ... " To determine what is "ordinary" in an isolated transaction the event being set in motion must be one that is considered ordinary in trade. If the isolated transaction is in the nature or concern of a particular trade, the transaction ought to be a transaction considered ordinary in that trade. ...

Pages