Search - considered

As the Supreme Court noted in Baker at paragraph 22: […] the purpose of participatory rights contained within the duty of procedural fairness is to ensure that administrative decisions are made using a fair and open procedure, appropriate to the decision being made and its statutory, institutional, and social context, with an opportunity for those affected by the decision to put forward their views and evidence fully and have them considered by the decision-maker. [27]   Counsel for the GFN submits that neither the Election Law, nor any applicable statute or the common law, require that there be an oral hearing of an appeal. ...

General impression to be considered Il faut tenir compte de l’impression générale (4) In a prosecution for a contravention of this section, the general impression conveyed by a representation as well as its literal meaning shall be taken into account in determining whether or not the representation is false or misleading in a material respect. (4) Dans toute poursuite intentée en vertu du présent article, pour déterminer si les indications sont fausses ou trompeuses sur un point important il faut tenir compte de l’impression générale qu’elles donnent ainsi que de leur sens littéral. ...

(see also Singh at para 3 and He v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 49 ACWS (3d) 562, [1994] FCJ No 1107 at para 2). [49]   The RPD considered the evidence of Mr. ...

The Officer considered the letters, but concluded that the applicant’s English ability was insufficient to grant the work permit.  ...

Even if a case may be moot because there is no longer a live controversy or concrete dispute, it is nevertheless necessary to determine whether the Court should exercise its discretion to hear and determine the case on the merits where circumstances warrant. [46]   Three overriding principles are to be considered in this second step of a mootness analysis: (i) the presence of an adversarial relationship (Borowski at para 31); (ii) the need to promote judicial economy (at para 34); and (iii) the need for the court to show a measure of awareness of its proper role as the adjudicative branch of government (at para 40). ...

The agreement was not intended to be a compromise settlement of the type considered in Galway. [33]   Third, the Crown does not suggest that the defect within the settlement agreement is self-evident to the Court as it was in Galway. ...

The respondent and the intervener maintain that this argument is supported by the fact that the appellant considered herself self-employed with Revenue Canada when she filed her annual tax return. [19]   Therefore, the fundamental issue is whether the long and detailed contract of employment is largely in keeping with the facts and circumstances surrounding the performance of commission work. [20]   To this question, I would answer “no”, based on the following elements established by the evidence. [21]   I am referring to the following elements in particular: 1.   ...

Ahmar as a witness, finding him to be honest, forthright and frank in his description of the events that led to the demise of Strong Forming. [11]   The Tax Court considered Mr. ...

the applicant must satisfy all conditions precedent giving rise to that duty [54]   On the basis of the material submitted, I am not satisfied that the Applicant has met the elevated test for a “serious issue” when the above requirements for a successful mandamus application are considered. [55]   As of the date the Applicant’s Motion was heard, the evidence showed that the GST/HST returns for the months of December 2019, January 2020 and February 2020 were not assessed. [56]   The Respondent is under a legal duty to assess these returns. ...

Kanagasabai in looking more closely at whether there were expenditures which could be considered business expenses of the Appellant. [33]   During Mr. ...