Search - considered

Filter by Type:

Results 18201 - 18210 of 49139 for considered
FCTD

Ossai v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 313

A separate CRA official, not involved with the initial decision, has carefully considered the circumstances and facts of your case in relation to the Income Tax Act. ... If you become a non-resident of Canada, or are considered to be a non-resident for income tax purposes:- You will be allowed to keep your TFSA and you will not be taxed in Canada on any earnings in the account or on withdrawals from it- No TFSA contribution room will accrue for any year throughout which you are a non-resident of Canada- Any withdrawals made during the period that you were a non-resident will be added back to your TFSA contribution room in the following year, but will only be available if you re-establish your Canadian residency status for tax purposes. ...
EC decision

Minister of National Revenue v. Valclair Investment Company Limited, [1964] CTC 22, 64 DTC 5014

Blain, who was the only witness called, he considered that a better diversification of investments was required so that, in the event of a stock market crisis, the Company would have an interest in another sphere of investment, such as real estate. ... Shares sometimes called growth stocks which, at the date of their purchase, are not on a dividend-paying basis, often form part of an investment company’s portfolio and are considered, for tax purposes, as investments, since they are susceptible not only of capital growth but also of producing income. ...
EC decision

John 8. Stewart v. Minister of National Revenue, [1964] CTC 45, 64 DTC 5023

The only question remaining is whether the dogs constitute a part of what could be considered as 11 a business carried on for profit or with a reasonable expectation of profit” under Section 139(1) (ae) of the Act which defines ‘‘ Personal or Living Expenses” as follows: ‘“the expenses of properties maintained by any person for the use or benefit of the taxpayer or any person connected with the taxpayer... and not maintained in connection with a business carried on for profit or with a reasonable expectation of profit,” and, of course, if they are personal or living expenses they would not be deductible as such under Section 12(1) (h) of the Act which reads as follows: “In computing income, no deduction shall be made in respect of personal or living expenses of the taxpayer...” ... From all this, there seems to be but one conclusion which is that although this may not be a hobby in the ordinary sense of the word, 1.e., a favourite occupation pursued for amusement, it could well be considered, as in my opinion it is, an inordinate and unreasonable passion for the breeding of dogs. ...
EC decision

Brookview Investments Limited, Frank Wilson, Morris Wilson, Sydney Wilson, Ellendale Investments Limited, Bruce Finkler and Elliot L. Marrus v. Minister of National Revenue, [1963] CTC 316

Weinstein 138% 12,839.46 13⅕- Wilson Brothers. 134%, 12,339.46 13⅕- Posluns Brothers — 13% 12,339.46 13⅕- Ellendale Investments Limited 131/3 12,339.46 13⅕- Lewis, Marrus & Finkler 131/3 12,110.25 13⅕- TOTAL 100% — $92,316.76 The transaction with respect to the land was considered subsequently by the group as likely to be unsuccessful. ... What is the line which separates the two classes of cases may be difficult to define, and each case must be considered according to its facts; the question to be determined being— Is the sum of gain that has been made a mere enhancement of value by realizing a security, or is it a gain made in an operation of business in carrying out a scheme for profit-making? ...
EC decision

G. H. C. Investments Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1961] CTC 187, 61 DTC 1120

The importance of the appellant’s contention becomes apparent when Section 20(1) of the Act is considered for if it were well founded the amount of the recapture of capital cost allowances on the disposition of its depreciable properties to be included in computing its income for its 1958 taxation year would be considerably less than if the election did not have the effect claimed for it. ... While he assumed that regulations made under Section 49 of the Act were to be ‘‘taken and read’’ as part of the Act he saw no difficulty in holding that in the case before him the regulation called Rule 48, in so far as it was inconsistent with Section 16, must give way; or, as it was perhaps better to put it, the regulation must be read as subject to an implied proviso that nothing in it should be considered to sanction a departure from Section 16. ...
EC decision

Wilbert L. Falconer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1961] CTC 306, 61 DTC 1176

In making the re-assessment, the Minister included in the computation of the appellant’s income a sum of $66,400 as the value of certain shares of Ponder Oils Limited to which the appellant became entitled in 1951 and which the Minister considered to be a receipt of an income nature. ... Moreover, the knowledge that they, after examining the prospects, considered the locations to have sufficient merit to warrant drilling rendered it unnecessary for the participants to incur the expense of obtaining expert opinions on their own as to the merits of the locations. ...
EC decision

Hollinger North Shore Exploration Company Limited (No Personal Liability) v. Minister of National Revenue, [1960] CTC 136, 60 DTC 1077, [1960] CTC 135

The word ‘‘derived’’ has been considered in a number of cases in this Court, including Wilson v. ... I can see no distinction for the present purpose between the meaning of the expression ‘‘income derived from mining’’, which was considered in the Gilhooly case, and that of ‘‘income derived from the operation of a mine’’. ...
EC decision

Jugement en Conséquence. Beulah Gorkin and Jack Adilman, as Administra- Tors of the Estate of Nathan Adilman, Deceased v. Minister of National Revenue, [1960] CTC 237, 60 DTC 1177

Each case must be considered on its own facts to determine under which clause the transaction falls and, while there undoubtedly may be cases which may present considerable difficulty, the present is, in my opinion, not such a case, the circumstances affording a fairly clear indication of the side on which the transaction falls. ... Perry, [1934] A.C. 477, where the lack of the same historical background in similarly worded Ontario legislation was considered by the Privy Council to be an important difference between the two statutes. ...
EC decision

Montreal Trust Company, Marjorie Helen Smith and Gerald Meredith Smith, Executors Under the Will of Mary Anderson Scott, Deceased, and Marjorie Helen Smith, Personally v. Minister of National Revenue, [1960] CTC 308, 60 DTC 1183

The subsection 3(4) considered in the Smith case was the earlier subsection 3(4), as consolidated in R.S.C. 1952, c. 89, but that, in my opinion, makes no difference for this purpose since that subsection, as well, referred to ‘‘a general power to appoint or dispose of property’’. ... Smith prior to the renunciation was not involved in the judgment of the majority, Fauteux and Judson, JJ., considered that the power which Mrs. ...
EC decision

In the Matter of the Dominion Succession Duty Act, and in the Matter of the Appeal of Alma Catherine Burns and Richard John Burns, Executors or the Estate of Michael John Burns v. Minister of National Revenue, [1959] CTC 147, 59 DTC 1083

Now, both Regulation 20, above quoted, and the tables referred to therein purport to be made for the purposes of Section 34 of the Act, and at the time when they were made and published in December, 1948, Section 34 was still in the same form as it was when considered in Smith and Rudd v. ... Moreover, Regulation 20, as well, is in precisely the same form as the one relied on and considered in that case. ...

Pages