Search - considered
Results 7911 - 7920 of 7933 for considered
TCC
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. The Queen, 2015 DTC 1235 [at 1551], 2015 TCC 280
Indeed, it could be said that in adopting the exception that the Respondent seeks to rely on in this motion, these cases considered that the public interest in having full access to material in order to have a full and fair trial outweighed the public interest in promoting settlement, particularly when there would be no prejudice to the party relying on the privilege since the communications could not be used against them for the same conduct that was the subject of the settlement. ... It says tax motivation does not need to be singled out as something that needs to be specifically pleaded, since tax motivation is just one of many reasons why CIBC’s deduction could be offside with either paragraph 18(1)(a) or s. 9. [263] The Respondent also points to McKesson Canada Corporation v The Queen, [125] which said that tax motivation may be part of the factual context that needs to be considered for paragraphs 247(2)(a) and (c) of the Act, both of which are still in play in the tax appeals. [126] [264] In my view, the questions on allocation are generally relevant for the reasons the Respondent proposes. ... McKesson Canada Corporation noted that tax motivation may be part of the factual context that needs to be considered for these subsections, and given the low relevancy threshold associated with discovery, I find that these questions are generally proper and should not be broadly deemed to be irrelevant. ...
TCC
O'Dea v. The Queen, 2009 DTC 912, 2009 TCC 295
In determining the projected service bureau fees, Sean O’Dea considered the anticipated sales in Florida and Georgia. ...
TCC
I.B. Pedersen Ltd. v. The Queen, 94 DTC 1085, [1994] 1 CTC 2355 (TCC)
Fisher stated at page 17 (D.T.C. 193): For the purposes of the Income Tax Act, therefore, a bad debt may be designated as the whole or a portion of a debt which the creditor, after having personally considered the relevant factors mentioned above in so far as they are applicable to each particular debt, honestly and reasonably determines to be uncollectable at the end of the fiscal year when the determination is required to be made, notwithstanding that subsequent events may transpire under which the debt, or any portion of it, may in fact be collected. ...
TCC
Coveley v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1041 [at at 2771], 2013 TCC 417, aff'd 2014 FCA 281
If there is some evidence of an event that will probably occur in the future that would suggest that the debt is collectible on the happening of the event, the future event should be considered. ...
TCC
Les Pro-Poseurs Inc. v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 113
They cannot succeed in that purpose unless they are considered to be mandatory requirements and strictly enforced. ...
TCC
Les voitures Orly Inc./Orly Automobiles Inc. v. The Queen, 2004 TCC 86
I had the distinct impression that they were holding something back and were giving me the bare minimum that they considered necessary. ...
TCC
Massignani c. M.R.N., 2004 TCC 75
In general, the wages that Tibério received can be considered to be reasonable, because it is not unusual to remunerate a manager on a weekly basis, and an hourly rate of $14 to $18 does not appear disproportionate in the circumstances. ...
TCC
Peterson v. The Queen, 2003 TCC 712
I considered this question in the appeal of Elizabeth Bates, 98 DTC 1919. ...
TCC
Auto D.L. Laroche Inc. v. The Queen, docket 96-3841-IT-G
(Toronto: Butterworths, 1999), at page 173: Written or oral statements, or communicative conduct made by persons otherwise than in testimony at the proceeding in which it is offered, are inadmissible, if such statements or conduct are tendered either as proof of their truth or as proof of assertions implicit therein. [99] Exceptions to the rule against hearsay were created in situations having the following four characteristics: [3] (1) It was impossible or difficult to secure other evidence. (2) The author of the statement was not an interested party in the sense that the statement was not in his favour. (3) The statement was made before the dispute in question arose. (4) The author of the statement had a peculiar means of knowledge not possessed in ordinary cases. [100] The following comments by the same authors should be considered in determining whether a hearsay exception may apply: [4] Necessity has given rise to a number of clearly defined exceptions to the rule against hearsay. ...
TCC
Thistle v. The Queen, 2015 TCC 149
These circumstances must be taken into account, but must be considered against an objective “reasonably prudent person” standard. ...