Search - considered

. […] [5]   In respect of the acts which the principal expressly or impliedly consents that the agent shall so do on the principal’s behalf, the agent is said to have authority to act; and this authority constitutes a power to affect the principal’s legal relations with third parties. [6]   [17]     The e xistence of an agency relationship was considered by the Federal Court of Appeal in Glengarry Bingo Assn. v. ...

For example, a specific legacy of $1,000 to an executor cannot be considered remuneration if the provisions of the will as a whole do not appear to refer to the executor's office. ...

Each case must be considered on its merits. In one case, a guideline may be very significant, but in another, because of different circumstances, its probative force may be negligible or it may have weight only because of the existence of other guidelines or indicators.   ...

In McCutcheon, supra, the Federal Court considered high proportions of interest income in relation to overall income important in concluding that the deposits there in question were not business income. ...

Therefore the Appellant’s move in 2008 could be considered to have occurred to enable him to be employed, even though the employment commenced in 2004 ...

., [4] the Federal Court of Appeal considered the effect of the Minister’s failure to consider the taxpayer’s assessment “with all due dispatch” as required by section 152(1) of the Act. ...

Similarly, general damages relating to human rights violations can be considered unrelated to a loss of employment, despite the fact that the loss of employment is often a direct result of a human rights violations complaint. ...

The nature of contracts of guarantee and indemnity was considered in R. v. ...

And at paragraph 59: [59]       A third factor to be considered in determining whether the group-based devaluation of human worth targeted by s. 15 is established, is whether the challenged distinction was designed to improve the situation of a more disadvantaged group. ...

I agree with counsel for the Appellant that this fact, considered in isolation, is not sufficient to conclude automatically that the Appellant was economically dependent on the Stever Group. ...