Search - considered
Results 2081 - 2090 of 7919 for considered
TCC
Bearss v. R., [1997] 1 CTC 2642, 97 DTC 190 (Informal Procedure)
The parties agree that the only question before the Court is whether this checking and changing constitutes an inordinate amount of time under subsection 118.4(1) of the Income Tax Act, which reads: For the purposes of subsection 6(16), sections 118.2 and 118.3 and this subsection, (a) an impairment is prolonged where it has lasted, or can reasonably be expected to last, for a continuous period of at least 12 months; (b) an individual’s ability to perform a basic activity of daily living is markedly restricted only where all or substantially all of the time, even with therapy and the use of appropriate devices and medication, the individual is blind or is unable (or requires an inordinate amount of time) to perform a basic activity of daily living; (c) a basic activity of daily living in relation to an individual means (i) perceiving, thinking and remembering, (ii) feeding and dressing oneself, (iii) speaking so as to be understood, in a quiet setting, by another person familiar with the individual, (iv) hearing so as to understand, in a quiet setting, another person familiar with the individual, (v) eliminating (bowel or bladder functions), or (vi) walking; and (d) for greater certainty, no other activity, including working, housekeeping or a social or recreational activity, shall be considered as a basic activity of daily living. ...
TCC
Thomas G. Keith v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 3 CTC 2657 (Informal Procedure)
In that appeal the trial judge considered the concept of an “inordinate” amount of time used by the legislature to describe a “marked” restriction of an inability to perform a basic activity of daily living resulting from a “severe and prolonged” impairment. ...
TCC
Rezba v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 2029
Subsection 118.4(1) of the Income Tax Act reads as follows: (1) For the purposes of subsection 6(16), sections 118.2 and 118.3 and this subsection, (a) an impairment is prolonged where it has lasted, or may reasonably be expected to last, for a continuous period of at least 12 months; (b) an individual’s ability to perform a basic activity of daily living is markedly restricted only where all or substantially all of the time, even With therapy and the use of appropriate devices and medication, the individual is blind or is unable (or requires an inordinate amount of time) to perform a basic activity of daily living; (c) a basic activity of daily living in relation to an individual means (i) perceiving, thinking and remembering, (ii) feeding and dressing oneself, (iii) speaking so as to be understood, in a quiet setting, by another person familiar with the individual, (iv) hearing so as to understand, in a quiet setting, another person familiar with the individual, (v) eliminating (bowel or bladder functions), or (vi) walking; and (d) for greater certainty, no other activity, including working, housekeeping or a social or recreational activity, shall be considered as a basic activity of daily living. ...
TCC
Robillard v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 2067
Since its amendment in 1994, applicable to the 1991 and subsequent taxation years, subsection 118.4(1) has read as follows: 118.4(1) For the purposes of subsection 6(16), sections 118.2 and 118.3 and this subsection, (a) an impairment is prolonged where it has lasted, or may reasonably be expected to last, for a continuous period of at least 12 months; (b) an individual’s ability to perform a basic activity of daily living is markedly restricted only where all or substantially all of the time, even with therapy and the use of appropriate devices and medication, the individual is blind or is unable (or requires an inordinate amount of time) to perform a basic activity of daily living; (c) a basic activity of daily living in relation to an individual means (1) perceiving, thinking and remembering, (ii) feeding and dressing oneself, (iii) speaking so as to be understood, in a quiet setting, by another person familiar with the individual, (iv) hearing so as to understand, in a quiet setting, another person familiar with the individual, (v) eliminating (bowel or bladder functions), or (vi) walking; and (d) for greater certainty, no other activity, including working, housekeeping or a social or recreational activity, shall be considered as a basic activity of daily living. ...
TCC
Peters v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 2071
Subsections 118.3(1) and 118.4(1) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act") read as follows for the 1994 taxation year: 118.3: Credit for mental or physical impairment (1) Where (a) an individual has a severe and prolonged mental or physical impairment, (a.1) the effects of the impairment are such that the individual’s ability to perform a basic activity of daily living is markedly restricted, (a.2) a medical doctor, or where the impairment is an impairment of sight, a medical doctor or an optometrist, has certified in prescribed form that the individual has a severe and prolonged mental or physical impairment the effects of which are such that the individual’s ability to perform a basic activity of daily living is markedly restricted, (b) the individual has filed for a taxation year with the Minister the certificate described in paragraph (a.2), and (c) no amount in respect of remuneration for an attendant or care in a nursing home, in respect of the individual, is included in calculating a deduction under section 118.2 (otherwise than because of paragraph 1182(2)(b.1)) for the year by the individual or by any other person. for the purposes of computing the tax payable under this Part by the individual for the year, there may be deducted an amount determined by the formula A x $4,118 where A is the appropriate percentage for the year. 118.4: Nature of impairment (1) For the purposes of subsection 6(16), sections 118.2 and 118.3 and this subsection, (a) an impairment is prolonged where it has lasted, or can reasonably be expected to last, for a continuous period of at least 12 months; (b) an individual’s ability to perform a basic activity of daily living is markedly restricted only where all or substantially all of the time, even with therapy and the use of appropriate devices and medication, the individual is blind or is unable (or requires an inordinate amount of time) to perform a basic activity of daily living; (c) a basic activity of daily living in relation to an individual means (i) perceiving, thinking and remembering, (ii) feeding and dressing oneself, (iii) speaking so as to be understood, in a quiet setting, by another person familiar with the individual, (iv) hearing so as to understand, in a quiet setting, another person familiar with the individual, (v) eliminating (bowel or bladder functions), or (vi) walking; and (d) for greater certainty, no other activity, including working, housekeeping or a social or recreational activity, shall be considered as a basic activity of daily living. ...
TCC
Macdonell v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 2450
But I have nothing to give me any guidance in that, except the dates that are on the documents would be considered to be the date at which time it took place. ...
TCC
Anderson v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2518, 98 DTC 1026
No services were rendered by the Appellants to the purchaser after closing. 10 There is no evidence to suggest that the $143,118 should be considered salary income other than the inadvertent characterization of it by the Purchaser’s accountants. ...
TCC
Cie Price Ltée v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 3055, 97 DTC 800
For the 1979 to 1983 taxation years, the appellant’s spare parts were considered as inventory under subsection 10(5) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) and the appellant was assessed on that basis. ...
TCC
Baxter v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2440
The following criteria should be considered: the profit and loss experience in past years, the taxpayer’s training, the taxpayer’s intended course of action, the capability of the venture as capitalized to show a profit after charging capital cost allowance. ...
TCC
Collins v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2717
I have considered the submissions made and the evidence and I cannot find any valid legal reason to conclude that these expenses are somehow deductible in 1992. ...