Search - considered

Filter by Type:

Results 11131 - 11140 of 14774 for considered
FCTD

Patrick W. Riddell and Sparkle Car Wash Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 2 CTC 434, 95 DTC 5530

Riddell to include in his income the following amounts: (a) the following interest paid by Sparkle on on the loans on behalf of Riddell; 1977: $28,990.59 1978: $27,556.68 1979: $27,373.97 1980: $39,923.97 (b) the following sums alleged by the Minister to be the principal portion of the loans paid by Sparkle on behalf of Riddell: 1977: $11,990.67 1978: $9,900.00 1979: $7,812.22 1980: $2,553.83 These amounts were considered by the Minister to be an appropriation of the property of Sparkle by Riddell, and therefore taxable in accordance with subsection 15(1) of the Income Tax Act; and (c) allowing Mr. ...
TCC

Michael Bendall v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 2 CTC 2172, 96 DTC 1626

That doubt is intensified and becomes disbelief when the objective facts are considered. ...
TCC

Terrador Investments LTD and Serin Holdings LTD v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 2 CTC 2260, 96 DTC 2012

Now, you mentioned that you considered that your properties, for example, had gone up in value I take it, and that was one of the reasons why you were liquidating? ...
TCC

Anthony F. Humphrey v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 2 CTC 2602, 98 DTC 2070

This only produced 17 orders which was considered an inadequate response. ...
TCC

Lucien Mazerolle v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2162, 94 DTC 1381

.), that: To determine whether a person has ceased to be resident of any particular place, the duration of his previous residence, his connections with that community and his interest in it are circumstances to be considered. ...
TCC

Dr. R. Hugill v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 2 CTC 2221

The criteria Dickson, J. states should be considered are: the profit and loss expenses in past years, the taxpayer's training, the taxpayer's intended course of action, the capability of the venture as capitalized to show a profit after charging capital cost allowance. ...
ABQB decision

Royal Bank of Canada v. Sparrow Electric Corporation, [1995] 1 CTC 101

This proposition appears not to have been considered by counsel and was not canvassed in their submissions which proceeded on the basis of the issue of priority turned on whether the charge was fixed or floating. ...
FCTD

Re Howard D. Milne, [1995] 1 CTC 122

Raymond, [1980] C.T.C. 520, 80 D.T.C. 6383, the Federal Court of Appeal considered an instance in which a bailiff, under writ of execution, had seized and paid money into court. ...
TCC

John P. Oster v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 1 CTC 2224, 95 DTC 104

He maintains that they should be considered as being reimbursements for expenses, although they cannot be quantified. ...
TCC

William Everett Code v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 1 CTC 2456, 95 DTC 812

The following criteria should be considered: the profit and loss experience in past years, the taxpayer’s training, the taxpayer’s intended course of action, the capability of the venture as capitalized to show a profit after charging capital cost allowance. ...

Pages