Search - considered
Results 18971 - 18980 of 19051 for considered
Technical Interpretation - Internal
14 March 2016 Internal T.I. 2015-0609671I7 - Earnout, Amalgamation, Cost of Shares and ECE
MNR, 68 DTC 5180, the court stated: In the absence of any definition in the statute of the expression “capital cost to the taxpayer of property” and in the absence of any authoritative interpretation of those words as used in Section 11(1)(a), insofar as they are being considered with reference to the acquisition of capital assets, I am of opinion that they should be interpreted as including outlays of the taxpayer as a business man that were the direct result of the method he adopted to acquire the assets. ...
Ruling
2008 Ruling 2008-0273471R3 - XXXXXXXXXX Ruling Request
We understand that, to the best of your knowledge and that of the Taxpayers, none of the issues involved in the ruling request is: (i) in an earlier return of the Taxpayers or a related person, (ii) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of the Taxpayers or a related person, (iii) under objection by the Taxpayers or a related person, or (iv) before the courts. ...
Ruling
2009 Ruling 2007-0261171R3 - Post butterfly transaction
To the best of your knowledge and that of each of the taxpayers, none of the issues involved in this ruling request is: in an earlier return of any of the taxpayers or a related person; being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of any of the taxpayers or a related person; under objection by any of the taxpayers or a related person; before the courts; or the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate other than the advance income tax ruling issued on XXXXXXXXXX, 2006 (our reference 2006-020398) (the "Original Ruling") and the advance income tax ruling issued on XXXXXXXXXX, 2007 (our reference 2007-0232261R3)(the "Second Ruling"). ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal
12 June 2009 Internal T.I. 2008-0294921I7 F - Montant reçu à l'égard d'un surplus actuariel
" " 20 " "Modification" is considered to be merely a partial alteration of a pre-existing thing. ...
Ruling
2009 Ruling 2008-0284621R3 - Loss Utilization
To the best of your knowledge, and that of the above-noted taxpayers, none of the issues involved in this advance income tax ruling request are: (i) in an earlier return of any of the above-noted taxpayers or a related person; (ii) being considered by a Tax Services Office or a Taxation Centre in connection with a previously-filed tax return of any of the above-noted taxpayers or a related person; (iii) under objection by any of the above-noted taxpayers or a related person; (iv) before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has expired; or (v) the subject of a ruling previously issued to any of the above-noted taxpayers by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate. ...
Ruling
2009 Ruling 2008-0297571R3 - Loss
To the best of your knowledge, and that of the Taxpayers, none of the issues involved in this advance income tax ruling are: (i) in an earlier return of any of the Taxpayers or a related person; (ii) being considered by a Tax Services Office or a Taxation Centre in connection with a previously-filed tax return of any of the Taxpayers or a related person; (iii) under objection by any of the Taxpayers or a related person; (iv) before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has expired; or (v) the subject of a ruling previously issued to any of the Taxpayers by the Income Tax Rulings Directorate. ...
Ruling
2009 Ruling 2009-0308611R3 - Alter Ego Trust
We also acknowledge the additional information provided in your subsequent correspondence dated XXXXXXXXXX We understand that, to the best of your knowledge and that of the taxpayers, none of the issues involved in the ruling request is: a) in an earlier tax return of the taxpayers or of any related persons; b) being considered by a tax services office or a tax centre in connection with a tax return already filed by the taxpayers or by any related persons; c) under objection by the taxpayers or any related persons; d) before the courts or, e) the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Directorate to the taxpayers or to any related persons. ...
Ruling
2008 Ruling 2008-0292121R3 - Alter ego trust for XXXXXXXXXX
We understand that, to the best of your knowledge and that of the Taxpayers, none of the issues involved in the ruling is: (i) in an earlier return of the Taxpayers or a related person; (ii) being considered by a tax services office or taxation centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of the Taxpayers or a related person; (iii) under objection by the Taxpayers or a related person; or (iv) before the courts, or if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired. ...
Ruling
2016 Ruling 2015-0623731R3 - Subsections 55(2) and (2.1)
To the best of your knowledge and that of the Taxpayers, none of the issues involved in the ruling request is: i. in an earlier return of any of the Taxpayers or a related person; ii. being considered by a tax services office or a tax centre in connection with a tax return already filed by any of the Taxpayers or a related person; iii. under objection by any of the Taxpayers or a related person; iv. before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has not expired; or v. except as set out in Ruling 2015-060144, the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Directorate to any of the Taxpayers or a related person. ...
Ruling
2006 Ruling 2006-0194461R3 - Consolidation of two Phantom Share Plans
To the best of your knowledge, and that of the Corporate Group, any Member or any Participant, none of the issues involved in this Ruling are: (i) in an earlier tax return of any member of the Corporate Group, a Member or a Participant or any person related to a member of the Corporate Group, a Member or a Participant other than with respect to the operation of the deferred compensation plans as they presently exist; (ii) being or have been considered by a tax services office or tax centre in connection with a previously filed tax return of a member of the Corporate Group, a Member, a Participant or any person related to a member of the Corporate Group, a Member or a Participant; (iii) under objection by a member of the Corporate Group, a Member, a Participant or any person related to a member of the Corporate Group a member or a Participant; (iv) before the courts or, if a judgment has been issued, the time limit for appeal to a higher court has expired; nor (v) the subject of a ruling previously issued by the Directorate to a member of the Corporate Group, a Member, a Participant or any person related to a member of the Corporate Group, a Member or a Participant other than as described in 8 of the above facts. ...