Search - consideration
Results 51 - 60 of 316 for consideration
Decision summary
Canada v. Confederation Life Insurance Co., [2001] OJ No. 2610 (Ont SCJ) -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c)
Blair J stated (at para. 32): Accordingly, their claims are for monies loaned to Confederation Life, plus an amount in excess of the monies advanced to reflect a consideration for the use of the monies advanced to the due date. Such a return, or consideration, is normally called "interest". ...
Decision summary
Customs and Excise Commissioners v. Tarmac Roadstone Holdings Ltd., [1987] BTC 5074 (C.A.) -- summary under Supply
.)-- summary under Supply Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Supply In finding that a parent corporation was making a taxable supply of the services of its employees to its subsidiary, Slade L.J. stated (p. 5084): "If A agrees with B that B will perform certain services for A and that he will reimburse B for certain specified expenses which will be incurred by B in the performance of both services, the agreement to reimburse is, in my judgment, well capable of constituting sufficient consideration in law for those services. The bargain may be a bad one from B's point of view, but the courts do not enquire into the monetary adequacy of consideration." ...
Decision summary
J. Gadsden & Co. Ltd. v. C.I.R. (N.Z.) (1964), 14 A.T.D. 18 (N.Z.S.C.) -- summary under Contract or Option Cancellation
Expense- Contract or Option Cancellation The taxpayer, which had agreed to pay a royalty to an American company in consideration for the provision by the American company of technical knowledge and of plans on an on-going basis, was entitled to deduct a payment made by it in consideration for the cancellation of the agreement. ...
Decision summary
Customs and Excise Commissioners v. Tron Theatre Ltd., [1994] BTC 5028 (Ct. Ses. (I.H.)) -- summary under Subsection 153(1)
.))-- summary under Subsection 153(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 153- Subsection 153(1) A theatre company which invited members of the public to sponsor a new seat in the theatre by paying £150, and which provided such subscribers with a personalized brass plaque displayed on the seat, an acknowledgement in its main foyer and a limited edition print by a Glagow artist, was liable to VAT on the total proceeds received pursuant to s. 10(2) of the Value Added Tax Act, 1983 (which provided that "if the supply is for a consideration in money its value shall be taken to be such amount as... is equal to the consideration"), notwithstanding evidence that the payments included an extremely large element of donation. ...
Decision summary
Teleglobe Canada Inc. v. The Queen, 2000 DTC 2493 (TCC), aff'd 2002 DTC 7517, 2002 FCA 408 -- summary under Other
The Queen, 2000 DTC 2493 (TCC), aff'd 2002 DTC 7517, 2002 FCA 408-- summary under Other Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Fair Market Value- Other Part of the consideration for assets purchased by the taxpayer was the issue by it of special shares with an aggregate stated capital of $1,000. ... In finding that the portion of the assets acquired through the issue of the special shares should be considered to have a cost to the taxpayer of $1,000, Rip T.C.J. stated (at pp. 2510-2511) that "it is the directors who determine the stated capital of shares and the consideration for the issue of the shares", and further noted that the date of payment of the dividend might have been delayed indefinitely until the directors determined to pay it. ...
Decision summary
Murray v. Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. (1967), 44 TC 175 (CA) -- summary under Patents and Know-How
Profit- Patents and Know-How The taxpayer, which had been granted the exclusive world-wide licence to exploit the master patent for "Terylene" and was the owner of ancillary patents, granted to a Dutch company an exclusive licence of the right to exploit these rights and related know-how in the Netherlands and Belgian market in consideration for an annual royalty and, in addition, received a lump sum payment of £400,000 for its covenant not to enter those markets for the period of the patent. Since the £400,000 payment in essence was consideration for the granting of an exclusive licence of patent rights, i.e., for the disposition of a capital property, it was a capital receipt. ...
Decision summary
Royal Bank of Canada v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] UKSC 2 -- summary under Paragraph (c)
Royal Bank of Canada v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] UKSC 2-- summary under Paragraph (c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 217- Imported Taxable Supply- Paragraph (c) situs of a contractual obligation is the country where it can be enforced Before affirming the judgment of Falk LJ of the Court of Appeal, Lady Rose noted (at para. 48) in passing that: It is convenient to mention at this point that at para 54 of the leading judgment in the Court of Appeal, Falk LJ raised a problem about locating the situs of the right to receive the consideration referred to in Article 6(2). It is straightforward to treat the location of the actual land or the rights in the land as being in the State of source but it is more difficult to locate the situs of rights to payments in consideration of the right to work. ...
Decision summary
Des Groseillers v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2019 QCCQ 1430, rev'd 2021 QCCA 906 -- summary under Paragraph 7(3)(a)
Agence du revenu du Québec, 2019 QCCQ 1430, rev'd 2021 QCCA 906-- summary under Paragraph 7(3)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 7- Subsection 7(3)- Paragraph 7(3)(a) no s. 69(1)(b) application to s. 7(1)(b) dispositions An individual (Des Groseillers) who donated some of his employee stock options on the shares of the qualifying person (“BMTC”) to arm's length registered charities was assessed by the ARQ on the basis that the Quebec equivalent of s. 69(1)(b) (Taxation Act, s. 422) deemed the “value of the consideration for the disposition” received by him to be equal to the options’ fair market value of $3M, thereby resulting in the receipt of deemed employment income in that amount by him pursuant to the Quebec equivalent of s. 7(1)(b) (TA, s. 50). ... He further found, in the alternative, that even if the s. 7(1)(b) equivalent applied, it only applied on the basis of the nil consideration actually received by Des Groseillers rather than being expanded by the s. 69(1)(b) equivalent to deem the consideration to be $3M. ...
Decision summary
Larocque (Fiducie familiale Larocque) v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2025 QCCQ -- summary under Subsection 160(1)
Two days after the ARQ had issued a statement of account to Construction LMA showing that it had failed to remit over $527,000 in sales taxes and employee source deductions, Larocque transferred his residence, which was charged with a hypothec in favor of the Caisse Desjardins to secure various credit facilities owing to the Caisse by Construction LMA (the “bank debt”) to a newly formed trust (of which Larocque was the beneficiary and one of the two trustees) in consideration for the assumption of the bank debt. ... Tremblay JCQ, noted that, in fact, Larocque had continued to service the bank debt, so that the consideration received by him from the trust for the transfer by him was “purely fictitious” and that the purported assumption of the bank debt was a “sham” (TaxInterpretations translation, para. 52). Tremblay JCQ, however, agreed with counsel for the trust that the ARQ could not reverse its assessing position and that “the determination of the value of the consideration must be made at the time of the transfer” (para. 54). ...
Decision summary
Commissioner of Taxation v PepsiCo Inc, [2025] HCA 30 -- summary under Paragraph 212(1)(d)
A “royalty” was relevantly defined as amounts paid or credited as consideration for the use of or the right to use various listed types of intellectual property, including trademarks. In concluding that the amounts paid by SAPL to PBS were not a royalty, and after discussing the meaning of "consideration for", the majority stated (at para 174): The Commissioner did not dispute that [the concentrate price] was an arm's length price, or a fair price, or that it was not disproportionately high. ... Words and Phrases consideration for derived ...