Search - consideration

Results 541 - 550 of 584 for consideration
SCC

F.W. Woolworth Co. Limited v. The Queen, [1957] SCR 738

There is nothing in the reasons for judgment in the Courts below to indicate that the point now under consideration was put forward in those Courts; but, assuming that the point is open to the respondent, there appear to me to be two answers to it. ...
SCC

Atco Ltd. v. Calgary Power Ltd., [1982] 2 SCR 557

In examining the statute and the legal considerations arising in construing its provisions, it is well to bear in mind the Board’s finding of fact on the point of ownership: [Page 570] For the purposes of this Decision, the Board finds as a fact that ATCO is “managing or controlling” CUL and its subsidiaries and therefore is an owner of a public/gas utility. ...
SCC

Deputy Minister of Rev. (Que.) v. Rainville, [1980] 1 SCR 35

Finally, I think I should be allowed to rely on considerations of the same kind as those on which the judgment of this Court was based in Board of Industrial Relations v. ...
SCC

Charles Glass Greenshields and Chartered Trust Company v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1959] CTC 77

It is with these considerations in mind that Section 31 of the Quebec Succession Duties Act is to be interpreted. ...
SCC

Judgment Accordingly. Charles Glass Greenshields and Chartered Trust Company v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1959] CTC 76

It is with these considerations in mind that Section 31 of the Quebec Succession Duties Act is to be interpreted. ...
SCC

Executors of the Will of the Honourable Patrick Burns, Deceased v. Minister of National Revenue,, [1946] CTC 253

Without repeating the considerations already mentioned, it is abundantly clear that no part of the trust fund, or specifically that part of it that the respondent seeks to tax, is income that will ever be received as such by the beneficiaries who it is now contended are unascertained persons. ...
SCC

Municipal District of Sugar City No. 5 v. Bennett & White (Calgary) Limited, [1950] CTC 410

., and it was found that as the facts underlying the ratio decidendi in the former were not present, the decision did not affect the matter under consideration. ...
SCC

Hall v. Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue), [1998] 1 SCR 220

In addition to all other powers they have by law, my Executors and Trustees shall, without judicial authorization or the consent of any beneficiary, have the following powers which they may exercise in their uncontrolled discretion:   (a)   to sell, hypothecate and alienate from time to time all or any part of the property of my estate, moveable as well as immoveable, to receive the proceeds and consideration and grant discharge and main‑levee therefor and also to abandon or give away any property, moveable or immoveable that they may consider worthless;   (b)  to invest and re‑invest all moneys of my estate.. . .                                                                     . . .   ...
SCC

Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 34, [2012] 2 SCR 231

          (9)     Policy Considerations [118]                       The policy concern raised by the ESA is that a copyright holder should not be entitled to both a reproduction and a communication right in the context of Internet downloads. [119]                       The answer to this concern is straightforward: the rights of copyright holders under s. 3(1) are distinct and separate rights.  ... Its use should be facilitated rather than discouraged, but this should not be done unfairly at the expense of those who created the works of arts and intellect in the first place. [125]                       In light of these considerations, providing exceptions to the right to communicate by telecommunication is properly left to Parliament.  ...
SCC

MNR v. Publishers Guild of Canada Ltd., 57 DTC 1017, [1957] CTC 1 (Ex Ct)

While the issue in both of them is, of course, whether the assessments levied against the taxpayer for the years in dispute are correct, and there is a statutory presumption of their validity until they are shown to be erroneous either in fact or in law, the appeals involve consideration of the appropriateness of the instalment system of accounting to the taxpayer’s business and the computation of its income. ... Thus the prime consideration, Where there is a dispute about a system of accounting, is, in the first place, whether it is appropriate to the business to Which it is applied and tells the truth about the taxpayer’s income position and, if that condition is satisfied, whether there is any prohibition in the governing income tax law against its use. ...

Pages