Search - connection

As the Panel noted, the duty to assess evidence in its best possible light and to the benefit of an applicant does not eliminate the applicant’s burden of demonstrating a significant causal connection between her medical condition and military service. ...

The Respondent concedes that such letter is not mandatory, but argues that nonetheless, the Applicant bears the onus to convince the Officer of the genuineness of the purpose of his visit to Canada, and that he will leave at the end of his stay. [29]   The Respondent argues that the Officer could legitimately question the Applicant’s plans as a student since there is no connection between the studies the Applicant was planning to undertake in Canada and the ones he had completed in his country. [30]   In light of the above, the Respondent submits that the Applicant failed to demonstrate that the decision-maker erred in law, made perverse findings of fact without regard to the evidence, or breached procedural fairness. ...

Other mechanisms exist for deterring misconduct in connection with the removal process, including arrest and detention.   ...

I agree. [23]   In this connection, the Federal Court of Appeal determined that an inference of abandonment may be drawn where a mark has not been used for a long period; Iwasaki Electric Co Ltd v Hortilux Schreder BV, 2012 FCA 321 per Blais, Sharlow and Webb JJA at para 21 [Iwasaki]: As noted above, abandonment of a trade-mark is not determined based solely on a person ceasing to use that trade-mark. ...

Given that a refugee claimant does not fall under this definition, the RPD reasonably concluded section 11 of the Charter is not engaged. [26]   Further, under section 7 of the Charter, applicants must show a deprivation of their life, liberty, or security of the person and prove sufficient casual connection between state-caused delay and any serious or profound effects (Blencoe, above at paras 57, 59-60, 81, and 83). ...

As a result, I find that the Applicants have not established any connection between the medical evidence and a purported error in the RPD’s analysis. [29]   Finally, the Applicants rely on a prior Immigration Division (ID) decision in which certain Georgian officials in the Ministry of Internal Affairs were found to have engaged in war crimes. ...

(Decision at p 7) [15]   Contrary to the Applicant’s arguments, the Officer neither rejected her application on the basis that she had not been personally targeted, nor that the country condition evidence was irrelevant to her claim, but rather that that the evidence lacked sufficient connection to her circumstances. ...

The purpose of subsection 96(1.1) is clearly not to determine how to calculate the income or loss of a retiring partner in connection with his assessment for a taxation year, taking into account the allowance resulting from the agreement in question, but simply to create a fiction which only applies for the purposes of subsection (1) and sections 101 and 103 of the Act. ...

.”, since that part of section 42 is strictly a particular definition which simply excludes such a "restaurateur, caterer or other person engaged in...” from the specific expressions "producer or manufacturer” when those expressions are used in connection with Part VI of the Act. ...

In this connection, the "revocation of clearance certificate” (D-16) signed on February 17, 1988 in no way benefits the plaintiffs at bar, who cannot rely on it. ...