Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 81 - 90 of 8576 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Did you mean?2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
TCC
Diana Williams Promotions Limited v. M.N.R., 2005 TCC 695, 2005 TCC 5
., 2005 TCC 695, 2005 TCC 5 Docket: 2004-4371(EI) BETWEEN: DIANA WILLIAMS PROMOTIONS LIMITED, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent.____________________________________________________________________ Appeal heard on common evidence with the appeal of Diana Williams Promotions Limited (2004‑4373(CPP)) on October 3, 2005 at Toronto, Ontario Before: The Honourable W.E. ... Signed at Toronto, Ontario, this 27th day of October 2005. "W.E. ... Signed at Toronto, Ontario, this 27th day of October 2005. "W.E. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
8 July 2013 Internal T.I. 2012-0470021I7 - Settlement of Future Benefits ASO Plan -- summary under Subparagraph 39(1)(a)(ii)
8 July 2013 Internal T.I. 2012-0470021I7- Settlement of Future Benefits ASO Plan-- summary under Subparagraph 39(1)(a)(ii) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 39- Subsection 39(1)- Paragraph 39(1)(a)- Subparagraph 39(1)(a)(ii) CRA noted that an employer's group disability plan which was administered by an administrator (such as an insurance corporation) on an administrativee services only basis nonetheless would qualify as an insurance plan ("IP") (and a wage loss replacement plan ("WLRP")) for the purpose of paragraph 6(1)(f) of the Act, if it contained "an undertaking by one person to indemnify another person, for an agreed consideration, from a loss or liability in respect of an event, the happening of which is uncertain." When asked whether the "decision in Tsiaprailis, 2005 DTC 5119, would apply to characterize a payment made by the administrator to an employee in settlement of future periodic benefits under the disability plan as a capital receipt from the disposition of a right," CRA stated: …where it is established that the ASO plan is an IP and therefore a WLRP, the decision of the SCC in Tsiaprailis would apply to characterize the amount of a settlement for future WLRP benefits as a capital receipt from the disposition of a right…. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
8 July 2013 Internal T.I. 2012-0470021I7 - Settlement of Future Benefits ASO Plan -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(f)
8 July 2013 Internal T.I. 2012-0470021I7- Settlement of Future Benefits ASO Plan-- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(f) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 6- Subsection 6(1)- Paragraph 6(1)(f) CRA noted that an employer's group disability plan which was administered by an administrator (such as an insurance corporation) on an administrativee services only basis nonetheless would qualify as an insurance plan ("IP") (and a wage loss replacement plan ("WLRP")) for the purpose of paragraph 6(1)(f) of the Act, if it contained "an undertaking by one person to indemnify another person, for an agreed consideration, from a loss or liability in respect of an event, the happening of which is uncertain." When asked whether the "decision in Tsiaprailis, 2005 DTC 5119, would apply to characterize a payment made by the administrator to an employee in settlement of future periodic benefits under the disability plan as a capital receipt from the disposition of a right," CRA stated: …where it is established that the ASO plan is an IP and therefore a WLRP, the decision of the SCC in Tsiaprailis would apply to characterize the amount of a settlement for future WLRP benefits as a capital receipt from the disposition of a right…. ...
FCTD (summary)
R & S Industries Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 275 -- summary under Subsection 18.1(2)
R & S Industries Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 275-- summary under Subsection 18.1(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Other Legislation/Constitution- Federal- Federal Courts Act- Section 18.1- Subsection 18.1(2) extension not granted due to unexplained lengthy delay and lack of substantive merit On September 1, 2005, the appellant (“R & S”) transferred its assets to a limited partnership (“BELP”) which was controlled by its controlling shareholder. ... On November 12, 2010 R & S filed a Notice of Objection asserting that a reassessment of its return for the taxation year of the transfer was based on amounts mistakenly provided on the previously-filed s. 97(2) election form. ... On August 8, 2014, CRA confirmed the reassessment, to which R & S filed a Notice of Objection. ...
Decision summary
Ingenious Games LLP & Ors v Revenue and Customs, [2021] EWCA Civ 1180 -- summary under Section 96
" In making its “with a view to profit” determination, the Court noted that the following principles generally were common ground: [S]haring profits … [is] not an essential characteristic of a partnership [citing Young v. ... It follows that the complex mosaic of generally accepted accounting practice … will generally have little part to play. Fourth … the view to profit need not be the predominant subjective purpose, but it must be part of the partners' subjective purpose. ...
FCA
Ofori-Nimako v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 DTC 5264, 2005 FCA 195
Canada (Attorney General), 2005 DTC 5264, 2005 FCA 195 Date: 20050519 Docket: A-292-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 195 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. ... Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 19, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DESJARDINS J.A. ... Date: 20050519 Docket: A-292-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 195 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. ...
News of Note post
14 March 2024- 11:00pm Suncor Energy – Tax Court of Canada finds that a s. 13(31)(a) deemed property acquisition by an LP did not accord it a corresponding deemed taxation year under the 2-year rolling start rule Email this Content Suncor acquired a Class 41 property in January 2005, then on January 1, 2006 transferred it on a s. 97(2) rollover basis to a limited partnership (the “LP”) of which it was the 99.9% general partner and whose first taxation year extended from February 1, 2005 to January 31, 2006 and second taxation year ended on January 31, 2007 (the “2007 taxation year”). S. 13(31)(a) deemed the LP to have acquired the property for purposes of s. 13(27)(b) at the time of its acquisition by Suncor, i.e., in January 2005. ... However, that is all it does …. There is nothing in the wording of subsection 13(31) that creates the fiction of the Limited Partnership having a year-end prior to February 1, 2005 …. ...
Current CRA website
Farming Income and the AgriStability and AgriInvest Programs Guide – Chapter 5 – Farm losses
If you do, you can carry it back for up to 3 years or carry it forward for up to 20 years for all non-capital losses incurred after 2005. ... The part of Sharon's net farm loss that she can deduct from her other income in 2024 is either amount A or amount B, whichever is less: $9,200 $2,500 plus 50% × ($9,200 − $2,500) $2,500 plus 50% × $6,700 Therefore, B = ($2,500 + $3,350) = $5,850. ... Non-capital losses incurred after 2005 can be carried forward up to 20 years. ...
Current CRA website
Cyclical Audits – T2 Phase 2 / T3 Transaction Flow-Through Audits
The listing contained amounts assessed during the period January 2005 – January 2006 to establish the population of 2004 tax year-end (TYE) assessments from which the samples could be drawn. ... Of these, 39 accounts had balances of zero or no data available as at March 31, 2005, leaving 101 RL accounts into which taxes and credits had been posted. ... These 58 accounts represented 99% of the more than $45 billion value of T2 taxes and credits recorded in RL as at March 31, 2005. ...
News of Note post
The taxable income of the affiliate for 2000 had arisen as a result of a 2005 settlement which had reduced a 2001 non-capital loss (and, thus, reduced the loss carryback to 2000), thereby leaving 2000 unsheltered. ... Because it did not request the carryback of the additional 2002 loss in 2005 (even though CRA knew about it), this policy was to no avail. ... The Queen, 2020 TCC 64 under s. 152(6), s. 160(1)(e)(ii) and General Concepts – Onus. ...