Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 211 - 220 of 8576 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Did you mean?2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
TCC
Dubé Et Al v. M.N.R., 2005 TCC 652
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 2nd day of December 2005. "Alain Tardif" Tardif J. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 2nd day of December 2005. "Alain Tardif" Tardif J. ...
FCA
Maréchal v. Canada, 2006 DTC 6524, 2005 FCA 124
Canada, 2006 DTC 6524, 2005 FCA 124 Date: 20050411 Docket: A-472-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 124 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ... Date: 20050411 Docket: A-472-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 124 CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A. ... Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: April 5, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: Noël J.A. ...
3 December 2019 CTF Roundtable
Roundtable notes
In Scenario 1, the exchange rate of the US dollar is US $1 = CDN $1 at Time 1 and US $1 = CDN $1.2 at Time 2 At Time 2 Can Opco pays a dividend of $120 to Can Holdco In Scenario 2, the exchange rate of the US dollar is US $1 = CDN $1.2 at Time 1 and US $1 = CDN $1 at Time 2 At Time 2 Can Opco pays a dividend of $100 to Can Holdco. ... Regarding the first question, a similar question was asked at the 2005 APFF Roundtable. ... This implies a degree of correlation or direct substitution – one might say a “causal relationship” – between the disposition of the former property and the acquisition of the new one. ...
TCC
Proulx-Drouin v. The Queen, 2005 DTC 487, 2005 TCC 116
The Queen, 2005 DTC 487, 2005 TCC 116 Docket: 2003-3523(IT)G BETWEEN: Marlene Proulx-Drouin, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 14 th day of March 2005. "Gerald J. ... [46] The appeal is therefore dismissed, with costs. Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 14 th day of March 2005. ...
FCA
Amerey v. Canada, 2005 FCA 428
Canada, 2005 FCA 428 Date: 20051212 Docket: A-30-05 Citation: 2005 FCA 428 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. MALONE J.A. BETWEEN: AWID, AHMED, MAHMOUD AND MOHAMMED AMEREY Appellants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on December 12, 2005. ... MALONE J.A. Date: 20051212 Docket: A-30-05 Citation: 2005 FCA 428 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. ...
27 October 2020 CTF Roundtable
Roundtable notes
Email this Content 27 October 2020 CTF Roundtable Q.1 – ACB increase in s. 55(3)(a)/88(1) reorg Preliminary Response Official Response Q.2 – Consolidation of safe income in a corporate group Preliminary Response Official Response Q.3 – Safe Income on Reorganization Preliminary Response Official Response Q.4 – Sale of taxable Canadian property by a partnership Preliminary Response Official Response Q.5 – Art. ... Treaty where further French layer Preliminary Response Official Response Q.6 – MLI and PPT Preliminary Response Official Response Q.7 – Use of cottage by children of settlor of AET/JST/CLPT Preliminary Response Official Response Q.8 – SDA rules and formula-based appreciation plans Preliminary Response Official Response Q.9 – UK LLPs as corporations Preliminary Response Official Response Q.10- Refreezes and s. 74.4(2) attribution quantum Preliminary Response Official Response Q.11 – Refinancing prescribed rate loans and attribution Preliminary Response Official Response Q.12 – Impact of COVID-19 on Previous APAs/Current MAPs Preliminary Response Official Response Q.13 – Reimbursement of Equipment Preliminary Response Official Response Q.14 – Section 86 Reorganization of Capital Preliminary Response Official Response This provides the text of the written questions that were posed, and summaries of the CRA oral responses, at the CRA Roundtable webinar hosted on 27 October 2020 by the Canada Tax Foundation. ... Last, but not least, the CRA supports that policy through the administration of the GAAR which was clarified back in 2005 as retroactively applying in treaty situations. ...
TCC
Bergeron v. M.N.R., 2005 TCC 372
., 2005 TCC 372 Docket: 2004-3785(EI) BETWEEN: IVANN ALEXANDRE BERGERON, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent. ... Signed at Montréal, Quebec, this 6th day of June 2005. "Louise Lamarre Proulx" Lamarre Proulx J. ... [18] Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. Signed at Montréal, Quebec, this 6th day of June 2005. ...
TCC
Dumont v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 790 (Informal Procedure)
The Queen, 2005 TCC 790 (Informal Procedure) Docket: 2005-85(IT)I BETWEEN: VAN DUMONT, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.__________________________________________________________________ Appeal heard on December 1, 2005 at Vancouver, British Columbia Before: The Honourable Justice G. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 21st day of December, 2005 "G. ... Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 21st day of December, 2005. ...
FCA
Venneri v. Canada, 2005 FCA 53
Canada, 2005 FCA 53 Date: 20050208 Docket: A-379-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 53 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. ... Date: 20050208 Docket: A-379-03 Citation: 2005 FCA 53 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. ... HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT NOËL J.A. ...
FCTD
Groleau v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 FC 1713
Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency), 2005 FC 1713 Date: 20051219 Docket: T-833-05 Citation: 2005 FC 1713 Ottawa, Ontario, Dec em ber 19, 2005 PRESENT: THE HO NOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE TREMBLAY-LAMER BETWEEN: GAÉTAN GROLEAU Applicant and CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY and LOUIS TURCOTTE, in his capacity as Acting Chief of Appeals, Québec Tax Services Office Respondent s REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (the respondent) under the fairness initiative, dated April 5, 2005, to deny an application for a waiver of additional overdue interest for the 1999 and 2000 taxation years, in accordance with subsection 220(3.1) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985 (5th Supp.), c. 1 (ITA) ... [13] Should the Court intervene and review the Minister’s exercise of discretion in his decision dated April 5, 2005, denying the applicant’s application for waiver of interest because of undue delay caused by the Agency? ... [22] Based on the evidence before me, there is no reason to determine that the Minister’s decision of April 5, 2005, denying the applicant’s application to have the interest waived was unreasonable; therefore the application for judicial review is dismissed, without costs. ...