Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Results 4781 - 4790 of 5351 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
TCC

Langelier v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1256 [at at 1435], 2013 TCC 322 (Informal Procedure)

Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 22nd day of October 2013.     "Réal Favreau" Favreau J.           ... Canada, 2005 SCC 54, I do not believe that Parliament's intent was to permit a taxpayer to deduct moving expenses in circumstances where a taxpayer performed new duties with the same employer at the same business location ...   [24]         For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.     Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 22nd day of October 2013.       ...
TCC

Barel v. The Queen, 2009 TCC 156

The Queen, 2009 TCC 156         Docket: 2007-3942(IT)G BETWEEN: PAUL C.J. ... BAREL, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT   V.A. ... At the end of the year 2005, the Appellant transmitted the required form for the withdrawals of funds from the 401(k) Plan to the plan’s trustee, The Vanguard Group.   9.       ...
TCC

Swain v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1086 [at at 2921], 2012 TCC 46

Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 10th day of February 2012.         "Patrick Boyle" Boyle J.       ... EM Diagnostics and Discovery Biotech had been clients of the firm since 2000 and the firm continued to do legal work in 2004 and 2005. ...
TCC

Bemco Confectionery and Sales Ltd. v. The Queen, 2015 TCC 48

The Queen, 2015 TCC 48     Docket: 2013-4832(GST)G BETWEEN:   BEMCO CONFECTIONERY AND SALES LTD., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.   ... Canada, 2005 FCA 104 at para 35. This, again, would be a matter that should be left to the determination of the trial judge who would have the benefit of hearing all of the evidence. [49]         In the case of pleadings that lack specificity, this Court has also held that the appropriate course of action would be a demand for particulars rather than a motion to strike: Kulla v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 136 at para 15; Kopstein v. Canada, 2010 TCC 448 at para 64 and 65. ...
TCC

Bégin c. M.R.N., 2004 TCC 707

Translation certified true on this 21st day of February 2005. Jacques Deschênes, Translator Citation: 2004TCC707 Date: 20041021 Docket: 2003-521(EI) BETWEEN: MARC BÉGIN, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent. ... Paragraphs 49 and 50 of the originating process states as follows:           [TRANSLATION] 49         The following damages were caused by the actions of Université Laval: Loss of earnings: $54,153 Fringe benefits: $6,044.33 Legal fees: $9,000 Moral damages: $5,000 Damage to reputation $10,000 50         Since the violation of the right is malicious, grossly negligent and intentional, the plaintiff is entitled to seek exemplary damages in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000);                                                                              [Emphasis added.] [14]     In addition, Mr. ... As mentioned above, the amount of these insurable earnings for the first relevant period is $55,908, calculated as follows:                 $21,839- July 10 to December 31, 2000                 $23,836- January 1 to July 10, 2001                  $10,233- July 11 to September 30, 2001                 $55,908 [38]     For all these reasons, Mr. ...
TCC

Cohen v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 550

The Queen, 2008 TCC 550         Citation: 2008 TCC 550 Date: 20081030 Docket: 2005-2304(IT)G BETWEEN: JENNIFER COHEN, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.     ...   [1]      This appeal is brought from an assessment made under section 160 of the Income Tax Act on April 18, 2005, and it arises out of a transfer from the appellant's husband to the appellant of his 50% interest in the matrimonial home, a single-family residence in central Toronto, which they held in joint tenancy. ... LAUFER:             But   MS. EDINBORO:       Very (inaudible.)   MR. ...
FCA

626468 New Brunswick Inc. v. Canada, 2019 FCA 306

LASKIN J.A.   BETWEEN:     626468 NEW BRUNSWICK INC.     Appellant     and     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN     Respondent   Heard at Halifax, Nova Scotia, on October 30, 2019. ... The Queen, 2005 SCC 54, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601, has set out the approach that is to be adopted in interpreting statutory provisions: 10   It has been long established as a matter of statutory interpretation that "the words of an Act are to be read in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament": see 65302 British Columbia Ltd. v. ... VIH Logging Ltd., 2005 FCA 36, [2005] 4 F.C.R. 61, stated: 38   However, the availability to the recipient corporation of an offsetting dividend deduction does not depend upon the paying corporation having actually paid any tax. ...
TCC

Bernier v. M.N.R, 2010 TCC 280

Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2005 FCA 334.   However, we may also note in the excerpt from Mr.  ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 14th day of June 2010.       "François Angers" Angers J.     ... Kirvan                                                           Deputy Attorney General of Canada                                                           Ottawa, Canada           ...
TCC

Marra v. The Queen, 2016 DTC 1028 [at 2696], 2016 TCC 24

Sani-Clean is alleged to have missed making relevant income tax payments in 2007 and 2008 and payments under the ETA for the reporting periods August 1, 2005 to July 31, 2009. ... The Royalton Banquet Hall was closed in 2005 and the business was moved to the Bellevue Manor. ... Marra transferred 37.5 shares to Silvana Sili so that the shareholding was as follows: Name Shares   Joe Canario       50 Les Breuer       50 John Manankil       50 Nancy Marra       112.5 Silvana Sili       37.5 [10]         Also on October 17, 2000 Messrs.  ...
TCC

Kanavaros v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 254 (Informal Procedure)

Signed at Ottawa, Ontario, this 22 nd day of May 2008.     “T. E. Margeson” Margeson J.           ... On the document it said January 9, 2005 but this was an error and it should have been 2006. ...   [41] In Scavuzzo v. Canada, [2005] T.C.J. No. 620 (T.C.C.), Justice Bowman determined that the taxpayer has a right to attack the underlying assessment. ...

Pages