Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

The ordinary meaning of “ comporter ” [in respect of] implies the notion of “ inclure ” [to include] or “ impliquer ” [to involve], “ comprendre ” [to include] or “ contenir ” [to contain, include], as evidenced in the definitions of this term in Le Nouveau Petit Robert, 2015 and Le grand Larousse encyclopédique, 2007. ... Canada, 2002 SCC 28, at paragraph 20, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 921; Nowegijick v. ... DATED: April 3, 2023 APPEARANCES: Alexandre Ajami   FOR THE APPLICANTS   Martin Lamoureux Amélia Couture   FOR THE RESPONDENTS   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Miller Thomson LLP Montréal, Quebec   FOR THE APPLICANTS   Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENTS     ...

As expressed by the Supreme Court in Mackin v New Brunswick (Minister of Finance); Rice v New Brunswick, 2002 SCC 13 at para 38 (relying on Valente at p 689), the test for independence asks whether a reasonable person, who is fully informed of all the circumstances, would consider that a particular court enjoys the necessary independent status. ... & O.), undermines the institutional independence of the General Court Martial. ... DATED: January 9, 2023 APPEARANCES: Ashley Wilson and Jennifer Zdriluk For The Applicants Andrea Burke, Christine Mohr and James Schneider FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ross & McBride LLP Toronto, Ontario FoR THE APPLICANTS Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT   ...

Standard of Review [16] The Federal Court of Appeal in Hospira Healthcare Corp v Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215 at paras 64-65 established that the standard of review from Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 applies when judges review orders of prothonotaries pursuant to Rule 51. ... The Minister relies on Nautica Motors Inc v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2002 FCT 422 (FCTD) and Express Gold Refining Ltd v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2020 FC 614, in support of its position that the Gallivan Letter does not reflect or communicate an exercise of discretion and is not entitled to deference on review. ... Southcott" Judge   FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-425-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: IRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC V THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE PLACE OF HEARING: heard via videoconference DATE OF HEARING: may 17, 2021 Order and reasons: SOUTHCOTT J. ...

  [10] The Applicant’s request for relief for the 2012 and 2013 taxation years was refused on December 2, 2015. ... "Simon Fothergill" Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-336-20   STYLE OF CAUSE: KC v CANADA REVENUE AGENCY   PLACE OF HEARING: held by videoconference between halifax, nova scotia and ottawa, ontario   DATE OF HEARING: February 10, 2021   JUDGMENT and reasons: FOTHERGILL J.   DATED: March 10, 2021   APPEARANCES: KC (on his own behalf)   For The Applicant   Caitlin Ward   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Attorney General of Canada Halifax, Nova Scotia For The Respondent     ...

Conclusion [28] The Plaintiff’s Appeal is dismissed. [29] The Defendant has sought and shall be awarded costs in the fixed amount of $250.   ... Blank “Patrick Gleeson” Blank Judge   FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1691-21   STYLE OF CAUSE: SHANEIL KUMAR SEWAK v HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF CANADA   PLACE OF HEARING: held by videoconferfence   DATE OF HEARING: December 12, 2022   ORDER AND REASONS: GLEESON J.   DATED: jANUARY 3, 2023   APPEARANCES: Shaneil Kumar Sewak   For The Plaintiff (ON HIS OWN BEHALF)   Katrina Longo   For The Defendant   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   For The Defendant     ...

He was also advised that if dissatisfied with the decision, he could ask for a second review which would be done by an officer who was not involved in the initial review and decision. [9] By letter dated March 30, 2002 [sic], the Applicant wrote that he was “disputing” the decision of March 28, 2022. [10] Another officer was assigned to review the Applicant’s eligibility. ... Vavilov, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653 (S.C.C.) (“ Vavilov ”), the decision is reviewable on the standard of reasonableness. [27] In considering reasonableness, the Court is to ask if the decision under review “bears the hallmarks of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility – and whether it is justified in relation to the relevant factual and legal constraints that bear on the decision”; see Vavilov, supra at paragraph 99. [28] The Applicant implicitly raised an argument about a lack of procedural fairness. [29] According to the decision in Cardinal v. ... DATED: NOVEMBER 29, 2023 APPEARANCES: Iain Paterson FOR THE APPLICANT (ON HIS OWN BEHALF) D’ette Bourchier For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario For The Respondent   ...

New Brunswick, 2002 SCC 13 at paragraph 86.   [59]            In the case at bar, I cannot find any conduct on the part of the plaintiff that could be described as “ reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous ”, or consequently, an abuse of proceedings. ... DATED:                                              April 12, 2010     APPEARANCES:   Mr. ... Deputy Attorney General of Canada     FOR THE DEFENDANT     ...

Assn. of Architectural Technologists of Ontario, 2002 FCA 218 at para. 30, [2003] 1 F.C. 331. ... Guignard, 2002 SCC 14, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 472, the Supreme Court stated that it attaches great weight to freedom of expression, emphasizing “the societal importance of freedom of expression and the special place it occupies in Canadian constitutional law”: at para. 19. ... DATED: JULY 29, 2019   APPEARANCES: A. Dimitri Lascaris   For The Applicant   Gail Sinclair Negar Hashemi   For The Respondent   Barbara Jackman   FOR THE INTERVENER INDEPENDENT JEWISH VOICES OF CANADA   David Matas FOR THE INTERVENER LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF B’NAI BRITH SOLICITORS OF RECORD: A. ...

Toews, 2012 FC 1442     Federal Court   Cour fédérale     Date: 20121206 Docket: T-859-12   Citation: 2012 FC 1442 Ottawa, Ontario, December 6, 2012 PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. ...   [29]            The Plaintiffs champion a purposive and contextual approach to the definition of “seizure” for the purposes of section 8 of the Charter, relying on the Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Quebec (Attorney General) v Laroche, 2002 SCC 72, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 708, which the Defendants introduced in their submissions.   ...   “ D. G. Near ” Judge FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                         T-859-12   STYLE OF CAUSE:                        MOHAWK COUNCIL OF AKWESASNE ET AL v MPSEP ET AL         PLACE OF HEARING:                  OTTAWA   DATE OF HEARING:                    OCTOBER 23, 2012   REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER BY:                           NEAR J.   ...

The Minister refused the request by correspondence dated February 25, 2002. ... The Minister refused the request by correspondence dated February 14, 2002. ... This was used to partially offset the original balance of $35,354.36 (effective date June 21, 2002). ...