Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Justice Scott   BETWEEN:   IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT   and     IN THE MATTER OF NOTICES OF ASSESSMENT BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT, THE CANADA PENSION PLAN AND THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT         AGAINST:       MEDHI TEHRANI 3718 Roger Lemelin Saint-Laurent, Quebec  H4R 2Z5                REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT   I.          ... He noted that the applicant reported to the bank an income of $70,000 for the year 2001 and an income of $72,000 for the year 2002. ... In fact, the income reported by the applicant to the CRA is $34,346 for the year 2001 and $34,529 for the year 2002, as it appears in Exhibit Q filed in the respondent’s motion record, volume 1 ...

Regards, Collin Lafrance Chief | Chef Press Gallery Secretariat Secrétariat de la Tribune de la presse [12]   A similar email was received by True North.   ... [21]   Canada noted, and I agree, that the request for an Order granting the Applicants media accreditation is beyond the jurisdiction of the Court under the Federal Courts Act, RSC 1985, c F-7: See Xie v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), (1994) 75 FTR 125 at para 17, Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development) v Rafuse, 2002 FCA 31 at paras 8 and 9, Canada (Attorney General) v Burnham, 2008 FCA 380 at para 11, Canada (Human Resources Development and Social Development) v Layden, 2009 FCA 14 at paras 10 to 15, and Adamson v Canada (Human Rights Commission), 2015 FCA 153 at para 62, leave to appeal refused, [2015] SCCA 380. [22]   The parties were informed at the commencement of the hearing that the motions would be considered only with respect to the request that the Court order the Commission to grant the accreditation that was sought. [23]   The motions before the Court are mandatory interlocutory injunctions, as they are in the nature of an injunction directing the Respondent Commission to do something. ... There is nothing speculative about that loss of opportunity.   It is certain.   ...

In that case a capital gain would result on their disposition.             3.          ... Canada, [2002] T.C.J. No. 134. [20]       Having set forth the legal principles that were to be applied by the Director, I now turn to consider whether the Director's reasons withstand a somewhat probing examination. ... This view was premised, in largest part, upon the facts that:             1.          ...

(c)                 Roger Van Kempen Seket Affidavit [51]            Mr. ... He has been employed as an Officer since 2002. He was the Officer who interacted with the Plaintiff on April 23, 2010. ... Manson" Judge     FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-158-12   STYLE OF CAUSE: CHRISTOPHER MYRON WARD v THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS   PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING: jUNE 9, 2014   judgment and reasons: MANSON J.   ...

III.              Issues [19]            The following issues arise in these motions: 1.                   ... Lifting the corporate veil is reserved for extreme cases (Meredith v Canada (Attorney General), 2002 FCA 258 at para 12). [36]            Second, it is not enough that a company has committed fraud, abuse of right or contravention of a rule of public order. ... PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, QuEbec   DATE OF HEARING: MAY 19, 2015   JUDGMENT AND REASONS: GAGNÉ J.   ...

Rex, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, 2002 SCC 42 "> 2002 SCC 42). A statutory provision must be read in its entire context, taking into consideration not only the ordinary and grammatical sense of the words, but also the scheme and object of the statute, and the intention of the legislature. ... [27]       In [1979] 1 S.C.R. 495 "> Canada (Minister of National Revenue- MNR) v. ... "Sean Harrington"                                                                                                    Judge                     Ottawa, Ontario March 8, 2005                                      FEDERAL COURT     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET:                                                        T-1976-04 STYLE OF CAUSE:                                       ROBERT GORDON, Journalist, and CANADIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND MINISTER OF NATIONAL DEFENCE PLACE OF HEARING:                                             HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA DATE OF HEARING:                                               FEBRUARY 9, 2005 REASONS FOR ORDER:                                      HARRINGTON J. ...

Rather, she took action in response to the RPD’s adverse decision.   2.   ... Digaf was a student when it was issued in 2005 when she had not been a student since 2002. ... DATED: OCTOBER 3, 2019   APPEARANCES: Daniel Tilahun Kebede   For The Applicants   David Joseph   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Law Office of Daniel Kebede Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario   For The Applicants   Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondent     ...

Beauchamp’s letter dated November 2, 2009; b)                   Ms. Palladino’s letter dated March 31, 2010; c)                   The undated investigation report by Corporal Harrisson of the RCMP; d)                   The tables prepared by Corporal Harrisson of the RCMP; e)                   The tables prepared by Mr. ... In support of their claims, the applicants filed a document (Exhibit P-27) taken from the website “whois.cira.ca”, which indicates that the website in question was reportedly created in 2002 by another corporation that has no connection with Mr. ... IV.               Conclusion [61]            To conclude, the Court understands that the applicants are trying by all means to prevent Mr. ...

Awashish must demonstrate a strong prima facie case. (2)   Corbiere and its consequences [21]   Mr. ... B.   Irreparable harm [34]   Irreparable harm is the second stage of the analytical framework. ... DATED: september 3, 2019   APPEARANCES: Robert Gagné Arianne Carrier   for THe APPLICANT   François Longpré Soudeh Alikhani   for the respondent CONSEIL DES ATIKAMEKW D’OPITCIWAN   Christina Caron For THe RESPONDENT MARCEL CHACHAI SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Gravel Bernier Vaillancourt Québec, Quebec   for THe APPLICANT   Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Montréal, Quebec   for the respondent CONSEIL DES ATIKAMEKW D’OPITCIWAN   Cain Lamarre Québec, Quebec for the respondent MARCEL CHACHAI     ...

V.                 Issues 1.                   What are the standards of review applicable to the various issues raised? ... New Brunswick (Judicial Council), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 249, at para. 78; and C.U.P.E. v. ... VIII.        Conclusion [55]            The application for judicial review is dismissed. ...