Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 571 - 580 of 844 for 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
FCTD
Lapointe v. Canada, 2003 FCT 102
Canada, 2003 FCT 102 Date: 20030130 Docket: T-2124-02 Montréal, Quebec, January 30, 2003 Present: The Honourable Mr. ... " (c) "[translation] all documents, including authorizations, powers of attorney, transfers by mail or by telegram... that are known to concern or to have concerned the entries and transactions appearing in the statements demanded in paragraphs (a) and (b) above". [4] The letter of requirement dated November 25, 2002, includes an appendix that reads as follows: [translation] This appendix is an integral part of the Letter of Requirement concerning the supply and production of documents attached hereto. ... JUSTICE LEMIEUX DATED: January 30, 2003 APPEARANCES: Josée Cavalancia FOR THE PLAINTIFF Maria-Grazia Bittichesu FOR THE DEFENDANTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Brouillette, Charpentier, Fortin FOR THE PLAINTIFF Montréal, Quebec Morris Rosenberg FOR THE DEFENDANTS Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec ...
FCTD
Bouchard v. Canada (Attorney General), 2006 FC 775
Bouchard’s behaviour had deteriorated in the previous year, particularly in December 2002 and January 2003. ... [11] Mr. Bouchard reacted poorly to what he saw as an attempt to deprive him of the benefit of the judgment obtained in December 2002. ... [31] There was also reference to the twelve observation reports on file dating from May, June, August, and September 2002. ...
FCTD
Harrison v. Canada (National Revenue), 2020 FC 772
The grammatical and ordinary sense of words in a statutory provision is not determinative, rather, the section must be read in its entire context and that: “This inquiry involves examining the history of the provision at issue, its place in the overall scheme of the Act, the object of the Act itself, and Parliament’s intent both in enacting the Act as a whole, and in enacting the particular provision at issue” (Chieu v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 SCC 3 at para 34). [70] With respect to interpreting the ITA, in Markevich the Supreme Court of Canada stated: [14] There is no authority to support the proposition that the ITA is a complete code that cannot be informed by laws of general application. ... FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-868-19 STYLE OF CAUSE: ELIZABETH HARRISON v THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE PLACE OF HEARING: BY VIDEOCONFERENCE USING ZOOM DATE OF HEARING: JUNE 16, 2020 judgment and reasons: STRICKLAND J. DATED: July 21, 2020 APPEARANCES: David R. Davies and Jennifer Flood For The Applicant Jason Levine and Julio Paoletti For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Thorsteinssons LLP Tax Lawyers Vancouver, British Columbia For The Applicant Attorney General of Canada Department of Justice Vancouver, British Columbia For The Respondent ...
FCTD
Scott Slipp Nissan Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 FC 1477
In that affidavit, Denny outlined further reasons for her refusal including: · that the information was of a nature that implied that other automobile dealers and others may have been involved in a scheme to defraud the Minister of tax revenues; · some of the information was references to other information. · some of the information might be competitively sensitive and that reputations might be damaged. · some of the information would not assist the Applicant in understanding and challenging the assessment. [13] However, prior to making the decision to refuse release, internal communication between CRA officials, particularly the e-mail of June 10, 2003, expressed concern about the class of information: that it came from third parties to CRA. ... L'octroi de pouvoirs, de droits, d'autorisations ou de facultés s'exprime essentiellement par le verbe « pouvoir » et, à l'occasion, par des expressions comportant ces notions. [28] It is recognized in Sullivan R., Sullivan and Driedger On the Construction of Statutes (2002 Butterworths Canada 4 th ed) at p. 56-60 that the use of the word "may" implies discretion but does not preclude obligation: The interpreter must determine whether there is anything in the statute or in the circumstances that expressly or impliedly obliges the exercise of the power. [29] As noted by the author, there are many cases in which the courts have found that the power conferred by "may" is coupled with a duty once all the conditions for the exercise of the power have been met. ... FEDERAL COURT NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-2195-03 STYLE OF CAUSE: SCOTT SLIPP NISSAN LIMITED and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Halifax, Nova Scotia DATE OF HEARING: April 6, 2005 REASONS FOR ORDER: The Honourable Mr. ...
FCTD
Kroll v. Canada (Revenue Canada), 2004 FC 863
Applicants and REVENUE CANADA CUSTOMS, EXCISE & TAXATION, GST DEPARTMENT Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of a delegate of the Minister of National Revenue ("Minister"), dated May 9, 2002. ... However, CCRA did not grant the applicant relief from the penalties assessed on his GST account for the period January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2001. [9] CCRA determined, after reviewing a report from the GST Fairness Review Committee dated January 15, 2002, that due to the financial hardship faced by the applicant as well as the disruption, personally and to the applicant's company, caused by the death of Ms. ... " Richard G. Mosley " F.C.J. ...
FCTD
Maloshicky v. Canada (Customs Revenue Agency), 2005 FC 978
The accountant also requested that the tax years 1997 through 2002 likewise be reassessed on the basis that the business should have been reported as a sole proprietorship belonging to Patricia Maloshicky. ... [5] The three taxation years subject to the Fairness Package are 1997, 1998 and 1999. [6] In a decision set out in letters dated 27 October 2004, Ms. ... He requested that the years 1997 through 2002 be readjusted. Since the years 1997 through 1999 were otherwise timebarred, he invoked the "Fairness Package". ...
FCTD
Kolokolov v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 998
Preliminary Issue [2] The Applicants are self-represented and they did not appear at the hearing of this judicial review. ... [15] The Applicants allege that the Visa Officer failed to consider the relevant evidence they provided in support of their request for TRVs. ... On judicial review this Court cannot reweigh the evidence that was before the Visa Officer (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa, 2009 SCC 12 at para 61). [22] Further, to the extent the Visa Officer found there was insufficient evidence to satisfy his concerns, there is no obligation on the Visa Officer to follow up with the Applicants for additional information (Qin v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCT 815 at para 7, as referenced in Dhillon v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 614 at para 1). [23] Overall, the Applicants have not identified any error by the Visa Officer. ...
FCTD
Aldarwish v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1265
V. Issues [19] The Applicants submit that the application raises the following issues: 1. ... Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII) at paragraph 25, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 [Housen]. ... Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII) at para. 25, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235. In Housen, the discussion with respect to the standard of review of inferences of fact arose in the context of a decision of a judge after a trial, but the same considerations apply equally to the review of an administrative tribunal’s role as a finder of fact and a maker of inferences of fact. ...
FCTD
McCrea v. Canada, 2019 FC 1132, 2019 FC 1133
/maternity leave/paternity leave benefits for a year commencing December 2004. [17] I have reviewed the additional written submissions filed by the Claimant, the documentation produced by ESDC in accordance with Section 8.04 of the Settlement Agreement and the written submissions filed by ESDC. [18] As detailed above, in order to meet the class definition, the Claimant must have “applied for sickness benefits in respect of an illness, injury or quarantine” during the period of March 3, 2002 to March 23, 2013. ... “Mandy Aylen” Prothonotary FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: T-210-12 STYLE OF CAUSE: JENNIFER MCCREA V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA and GILDA DEHDEZI PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario JUDGMENT AND REASONS: madam prothonotary mandy aylen DATED: September 4, 2019 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Steven J Moreau Cavalluzzo LLP Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario For The Applicant Christine Mohr Ayesha Laldin Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario For The Respondent Gilda Dehdezi For herself For The CLAIMANT ...
FCTD
Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1468
There, he met his ex-wife, a Canadian, in 2002. Following their marriage in 2005, she sponsored him for Canadian permanent residence and Mr. ... They divorced in June 2008. [3] Mr. Zhang met his current wife in China in 2002 and began dating the next year. ... DATED: November 20, 2019 APPEARANCES: Dov Maierovitz For The Applicant Suzanne Bruce For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Dov Maierovitz Barrister and Solicitor Toronto, Ontario For The Applicant Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario For The Respondent ...