Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

III.              Issues and Standard of Review [5]                The Applicants raise the following issues for the Court’s consideration: A.     ... IV.              Analysis A.     Did the Officer err in considering the H&C application of the adult son? ... Rather, the interests of the child are one factor which an officer must examine with a great deal of attention; it is up to the officer to determine the appropriate weight to be accorded to this factor in the circumstances of the case, and it is not the role of the Court to re-examine this weight (see Legault v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCA 125, at para 11). ...

It does not include the evidence by which those facts are to be proved. … [42] While the grounds in a notice of application for judicial review are supposed to be “concise,” they should not be bald. ... Attempting to “correct” errors or mistakes from the earlier decisions in via judicial review in a different court is an abuse of process. [33] The Applicant has not satisfied me that the Associate Judge’s Order contained a palpable and overriding error in the conclusion that the application is an abuse of process.   ... DATED: APRIL 11, 2025 WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY: Jeff Ewert For The Applicant ON HIS OWN BEHALF Johannie Dallaire For The Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec For The Respondent   ...

By order dated December 3, 2002, Mr. Justice MacKay set aside the Minister's determination and remitted the matter for reconsideration on specific terms. [7]         The decision in Amusements Jolin Inc. v. Canada, [2002] G.S.T.C. 111 (T.C.C.) was rendered after Janda's first application for judicial review. ... The Court retains jurisdiction with respect to the issue of costs of this motion.                          ...

This requires the Court to determine whether in rendering its recommendation the Committee achieved the level of fairness required by the circumstances of the matter (see: Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 SCC 1 at para 115, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3). ... Boswell" Judge   FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-287-16   STYLE OF CAUSE: GLORIA ROOPNAUTH v MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE   PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING: September 14, 2016   JUDGMENT AND REASONS: BOSWELL J.   ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondent     ...

She had two more children in December 2000, and November 2002, and returned to teaching in September 2006. ... (See also Miller v Canada (Attorney General), 2002 FCA 370 at paras 5, 23). [37]            Even though human rights jurisprudence in Canada has evolved in the two decades since the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision in Sollbach, it remains binding, and bolsters the investigator’s conclusion that there was no actual or effective discrimination in this case. ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The RespondentS     ...

As in most other Canadian jurisdictions, the cardinal principle governing costs awards is the full discretion of the trial judge: rule 400(1); Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v Maple Leaf Meats Inc., 2002 FCA 417 at paragraph 9, [2003] 2 FC 451 [Consorzio del Prosciutto]. ... II.   Solicitor-Client Costs [12]   Councillor Whalen seeks costs on a solicitor-client basis. ... III.   Lump Sum [29]   In the alternative, Councillor Whalen asks for an increased costs award on a lump sum basis. ...

Plaintiffs   and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD AND THE CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY Defendants   JUDGMENT AND REASONS   TOC \o "1-4" \h \z \u I.   ... II.   Background – Honeybees [10]   Canada’s winter climate, especially in the northern regions, is hostile to bees. ... V.   Costs [129]   Per Rule 334.39(1), no costs are awarded for this motion. ...

Justice Harrington   BETWEEN: BERTRAND BOUCHARD Applicant   and       ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   Respondent   REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER   [1]                On the one hand, Mr. ... Rex, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, is only one of many examples).     [20]            The Income Tax Act was designed to generate revenue. ... “Sean Harrington” Judge       Certified true translation Mary Jo Egan, LLB           FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                           T-959-08   STYLE OF CAUSE:                           Bertrand Bouchard v. ...

In May 2006, the reassessments were issued for the 2002 and 2003 taxation years, and the applicant did not object to those adjustments. [11]   On September 24, 2006, the applicant paid $9,775 to settle the amount owing for the 2000 taxation year. ... The applicant also agreed to the assessments from May 19, 2005, and to the addition of income for the years 2002 and 2003. ... The applicant agreed with the assessments the CRA issued in May 2005 and to the proposal to add income to his returns for 2002 and 2003; 2. ...

The reviewing court must ask “whether the decision bears the hallmarks of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility – and whether it is justified in relation to the relevant factual and legal constraints that bear on the decision” (Vavilov, at para. 99, citing Dunsmuir, at paras. 47 and 74, and Catalyst Paper Corp. v. ... Brown” Judge FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1345-21   STYLE OF CAUSE: MONIE RAHMAN v ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   PLACE OF HEARING: HELD BY WAY OF VIDEOCONFERENCE DATE OF HEARING: MAY 16, 2022 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: BROWN J. ... Rosen James Pendergast Kendal Steele   FOR THE APPLICANT Jesse Epp-Fransen FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Rosen Kirshen Tax Law Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario   FOR THE APPLICANT Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   FOR THE RESPONDENT   ...