Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Background   [3]                On February 1, 2003, during the time when she was preparing her income tax returns for tax year 2002, Ms. ... Although she was able to file her tax returns for 2002, she did not file subsequent tax returns on time for several years. ...   [9]                The CRA noted that the Applicant had been able to file the 2002 tax return, just four months after the accident. ...

  [2]                At the time the ex parte application was heard, the tax liabilities resulting from the notices of assessment issued with respect to the applicants were as follows: ▪   $239,505.93 resulting from five notices of assessment issued against Réginald Deschênes on April 28, 2010, for 2002 to 2006. ... Furthermore, Lynne Mimeault and Serge Deschênes had provided false tax returns for 2002 to 2010. ... Réginald Deschênes claims that he never received a letter explaining the assessments issued against him for 2002 to 2006. ...

The applicant was landed on January 17, 2002.   [3]                On August 6, 2005, the applicant left Canada and returned to Pakistan. ... “Yvon Pinard” Judge         ANNEX     The relevant portions of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, are as follow:    15 ... DATED:                                            June 14, 2012       APPEARANCES:   Me Mark J. ...

The 2015 By-laws provide that the Council “must consider the Inquiry Committee’s report and any written submissions made by the judge” (2015 By-laws, s 11(1)). [54]   Under the Canadian Judicial Council Inquiries and Investigations By-laws, SOR/2002-371, repealed, SOR/2015-203, s 15 [2002 By-laws], the judge under investigation could, upon request, make an oral statement before the Council. ... It is also consistent with that stated by the Court in Taylor v Canada (Attorney General), [2002] 3 FC 91, at paragraph 49: “ […] Sections 63 and 65 of the Judges Act do not confer an adjudicative function on the Council or its committees.” [61]   Similarly, the Federal Court gave this explanation in Gratton at page 31: It is true that a council can cause a committee to carry out an inquiry as to whether a judge should be removed, but ultimately all that the Council can do is to “recommend” to the Minister of Justice that the judge be removed from office. ... He notes that this function existed under the 2002 By-laws, but that it was not included in the 2015 reforms. ...

The Notice of Assessment for 2002 reflected a previous account balance of more than $68,900 and a current balance due of $69,897.98. [8]   Ms. ... Laflamme’s delay in filing her annual tax returns between 2002 and 2005. ... Carpenter in 2001 and 2002 of the requirement to file her tax returns. ...

Paul, Minnesota, Morton, Rose & Co. of London, England, and Kohn, Reinach & Co. of Paris, France. ... Furthermore, Dunsmuir #2 – the later decision – does not mention, much less, overturn, the Manitoba Reference. ... In the alternative, CPRC contends that Canada has not made out the required elements for the various defences. [752] Equitable remedies are always subject to the discretion of the court (Jiro Enterprises Ltd v Spencer, 2008 ABCA 87 at para 9; Performance Industries Ltd v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd, 2002 SCC 19 at para 66). ...

., 2011 FC 478           Date: 20110420 Docket: T-1228-07 Citation: 2011 FC 478 Montreal, Quebec, April 20, 2011 Present: Mr. Richard Morneau, Prothonotary   [ENGLISH TRANSLATION]   BETWEEN:     JYGA CONCEPT INC.       Plaintiff and   PIGBOSS SUIVI CROISSANCE INC. 9132-1877 QUÉBEC INC. JACQUES CIMON GÉRALD BEAUDOIN RENÉ BEAUDOIN       Defendants   AND BETWEEN:   PIGBOSS SUIVI CROISSANCE INC.     ...

(" ITA "). Background [3]                Dorothea is a Canadian knitwear manufacturer. It retained Absha Consulting to assist it in claiming SR & ED credits under the ITA for the 2001 and 2002 taxation years. ... Formosa (416) 365-1110                                                                        FOR THE APPLICANT Ms. ...

The Queen, 2003 FC 991 Date: 20030818 Docket: T-1176-03 Citation: 2003 FC 991 BETWEEN: DANIEL ARMALY                                                                                                                                                          Plaintiff                                                                                  and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                                                                                                                                    Defendant                                                             REASONS FOR ORDER HARGRAVE P. [1]                  These reasons arise out of a successful application to strike out the Plaintiff's statement of claim. ... CONSIDERATION [5]                  Defendant, as an initial ground for striking out the Statement of Claim, points out that, other than for additions to the damages claimed, it is identical to an earlier Statement of Claim filed by Mr Armaly in action T-859-01, which was dismissed, ex parte for delay, by Madam Justice McGillis on 10 December 2002. ... The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal 15 August 2002 and refused to consider the motion for reconsideration 13 November 2002. ...

III.   Issues and Standard of Review [19]   The issue in this case is whether the RPD’s decision is reasonable. ... Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCT 126, [2002] F.C.J. ... V.   Conclusion [32]   For these reasons, the application for judicial review will be allowed. ...