Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

By letter dated April 12, 2002, the Applicant was notified of this decision. [9]                 The Applicant then filed an application for judicial review in this Court, cause number T-749-02. ... By an order dated August 13, 2002, Justice Dawson allowed the Applicant's application for judicial review of the April 12, 2002 decision of Mr. ... Leigh issued a formal decision and notified the Applicant of that decision by letter dated November 19, 2002. ...

B.                  First Personal Reassessments [6]                On October 10, 2002, the Minister reassessed the Applicant’s 1998 income tax return [1998 Reassessment]. ... C.                  Corporate Reassessments [8]                In the same year as the first personal reassessments, the Minister also issued reassessments to the corporations under the Applicant’s control, dated May 7, 2002; August 9, 2002; and April 15, 2002. ... Collection activity resumed on July 27, 1999 and reached a balance of $4.98 million by April 9, 2002. ...

On May 12, 2008, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) issued a notice of reassessment totalling $151,814.02, based on an analysis of the deposits made into his bank accounts for the 2002, 2003 and 2004 taxation years. ... He failed to report a significant portion of his business income between 2002 and 2004, and he deposited some of his company’s revenue, representing several hundred thousand dollars of unreported business income, into his personal accounts. ... The taxpayer has exhibited unorthodox tax behaviour in the past, especially during the 2002 to 2004 taxation years.In fact, Mr. ...

  [5]           Based on the audit, the following assessments were issued against the applicant: Taxation year Type Assessment date Amounts assessed 2000 Notice of reassessment October 9, 2007   $99,456.76 2001 Notice of assessment November 20, 2007   $57,059.39 2002 Notice of reassessment October 9, 2007 $179,160.25 2003 Notice of reassessment October 9, 2007   $82,632.40 2004 Notice of reassessment October 9, 2007 $114,320.97 2005 Notice of reassessment October 9, 2007 $124,157.15       [6]           On October 24, 2007, notices of objection were filed against the notices of reassessment and the notice of assessment listed above. ... DATED:                                              October 2, 2009     APPEARANCES:     Daniel Bourgeois   FOR THE APPLICANT Ilinca Ghibu   FOR THE RESPONDENT       SOLICITORS OF RECORD:     De Granpré Chait, s.e.n.c.r.l. Montréal, Quebec   John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE APPLICANT     FOR THE RESPONDENT           ...

Since the independent third party found that in effect the hiring process had begun with a notice dated February 25, 2002, inviting employees to apply and that the employer had acted arbitrarily, he had reason to order that an error had to be corrected. ... Kelen” Judge     FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD     DOCKET:                                           T-937-06   STYLE OF CAUSE:                           ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA                                                               and                                                               ELSIE BEALL     PLACE OF HEARING:                     OTTAWA, ONTARIO   DATE OF HEARING:                       APRIL 19, 2007   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT:                           KELEN J.   DATED:                                              JUNE 14, 2007     APPEARANCES:   Mr. ...

The Court must determine whether the process followed in arriving at the decision under review achieved the level of fairness required by the circumstances of the matter (Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 SCC 1 at para 115). [9]   An issue of procedural fairness “requires no assessment of the appropriate standard of judicial review. Evaluating whether the duty of procedural fairness has been adhered to by a tribunal requires an assessment of the procedures and safeguards required in a particular situation” (Moreau-Bérubé v New Brunswick (Judicial Council), 2002 SCC 11 at para 74). ... DATED: July 25, 2019   APPEARANCES: David Matas   For The Applicant   Caroline Pellerin   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: David Matas Barrister and Solicitor Winnipeg, Manitoba   For The Applicant   Attorney General of Canada Winnipeg, Manitoba   For The Respondent     ...

Since the independent third party found that in effect the hiring process had begun with a notice dated February 25, 2002, inviting employees to apply and that the employer had acted arbitrarily, he had reason to order that an error had to be corrected. ... Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 84 and show greater deference to the independent third party's decision. ... ANDRÉE GAGNON PLACE OF HEARING:                     Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING:                       January 30, 2006 REASONS FOR ORDER BY:          The Honourable Mr. ...

For the following reasons, I conclude that the action should be dismissed. [27]            A party in receipt of a notice of status review (in this case a Status Review Order issued pursuant to Rule 385(2)) is required to address two questions: (1) is there a justification for the failure to move the case forward, and (2) what measures does the party propose to take to move the case forward: Netupsky v Canada, 2004 FCA 239 (CanLII); 323 NR 349 at para. 11 citing Baroud v Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) (1998), 1998 CanLII 8819 (FC), 160 FTR 91 (TD) and Manson Estate v Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2002 FCA 357 (CanLII), [2003] 1 CTC 13 (FCA) leave to appeal dismissed, [2002] SCCA No. 542. ... MARINE SERVICES v ARTIFICIAL REEF SOCIETY, OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE SHIP EX “ HMCS ANNAPOLIS, THE OWNERS AND ALL OTHERS, INTERESTED IN THE SHIP, EX "HMCS ANNAPOLIS ”   REASONS FOR ORDER: LAFRENIÈRE P.   DATED: december 2, 2015   APPEARANCES: James Straith   For The plaintiff/ DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM Bryan Hicks   FOR THE DEFENDANTS/ PLAINTIFFS BY COUNTERCLAIM SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Straith Litigation Chambers West Vancouver, British Columbia For The PLAINTIFF/ DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM   Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP Vancouver, British Columbia   FOR THE DEFENDANTS/ PLAINTIFFS BY COUNTERCLAIM   ...

Canada, [2002] T.C.J. No. 663 at para. 6 (T.C.C.)), the onus on the applicant to establish special circumstances is a high one (Source Services Corp. v. ... Canada (Attorney General), [2002] F.C.J. No. 367 at para. 2). [6]         Mr. ... DATED:                                              November 23, 2005      APPEARANCES: Mr. ...

  [17]            FOCC then provided in-Canada services in relation to the Terra Nova project in accordance with the terms of its subcontract with FMCI, invoicing Petro-Canada the sum of $886,341.84 in 1999, $3,790,752.60 for 2000, $8,795,023.10 for 2001 and $5,334,879.61 for 2002. ... FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                           T-243-07   STYLE OF CAUSE:                           FMC TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY v.                                                             ... DATED:                                              July 15, 2008       APPEARANCES:   Mr. ...