Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

She claims that she came to the attention of the Ethiopian authorities in 2002 when the authorities came to her home, looking for her uncle. ... A.   The RPD’s decision [10]   The RPD rejected the Applicant’s claim on the basis that the Applicant lacked credibility and did not provide credible evidence in support of her claim. [11]   The RPD concluded that the 2002 alleged events leading to the death of the Applicant’s mother and uncle did not occur in light of a number of discrepancies in the Applicant’s evidence. [12]   The RPD further determined that the Applicant’s testimony regarding the army raid on the church was not credible. ... The RAD also noted that the discrepancy between the times the Applicant first came to the attention of the Ethiopian authorities, 2002 or 2016, was “particularly troubling, especially as the allegation in the BOC is that she was raped as part of the 2002 capture, and that this is how she contracted HIV”. ...

The Queen, 2002 DTC 1540, and Neathly v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 611). Of course, the taxpayer must exhaust all available internal remedies before applying for judicial review. ...   [41]            The application for an extension of time to appeal from the 2000 assessments was allowed on January 25, 2002 by Deputy Judge D.R.  ...   [64]            In his affidavit, Mr. Laporte justified the delay after December 15, 2001, by noting that, on January 25, 2002, the applicant had been given leave by the TCC to appeal from the 2000 assessments. ...

Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 233 Date: 20140310 Dockets: T-1725-13 T-1744-13 T-1834-13   Citation: 2014 FC 233 Ottawa, Ontario, March 10, 2014 PRESENT:    The Honourable Madam Justice Kane   Docket: T-1725-13   BETWEEN: HAROLD COOMBS & JOAN COOMBS   Appicants and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   Respondent Docket: T-1744-13   AND BETWEEN: HAROLD COOMBS & JOAN COOMBS   Applicants and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA   Respondents Docket: T-1834-13   AND BETWEEN: OLEG VOLOCHKOV & ANNE VOLOCHKOV & JOHN F. ...        (2) Where an affidavit is made on belief, an adverse inference may be drawn from the failure of a party to provide evidence of persons having personal knowledge of material facts.       […]   82.  ... Holding Co v Jane Doe, 2002 FCT 13 at paragraph 10.  [Emphasis added]   [40]            In Polaris v Victory Cycle, 2007 FCA 259 at para 8, 60 CPR (4th) 194, Justice Sharlow confirmed that there is nothing improper where an affidavit of the associate of the solicitor of record attests to uncontested facts. [8]          Before dealing with the stay motion, I must address the request of Polaris to disregard the response of Victory to the stay motion because it is supported by an affidavit of a lawyer who practices in association with Victory’s solicitor of record, and is based in part on information and belief where the source of the information is Victory’s solicitor of record. ...

On November 14, 2002, the Prothonotary, John A. Hargrave (the Prothonotary) ordered (the 1 st Order) that: The matters in Schedule "A", which Schedule is attached, are now consolidated, to be heard together, or one following the other as the hearing judge may determine.   ... MNR       A SSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES       REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS:                     CHARLES E. STINSON   DATED:                                                                                  May 22, 2007       WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:   Ms. ...

She observes that the Applicant would have been in this category from the time they opened their account in 2002 but it had failed to inform the Respondent about an associated company ... Hansen” Judge         FEDERAL COURT   NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                           T-1404-05     STYLE OF CAUSE:                           K-Bel Holdings Inc. v. ... Hallsor   FOR THE APPLICANT Ms. Nadine Taylor-Pickering   FOR THE RESPONDENT     SOLICITORS OF RECORD:     Crease Harmon & Company Victoria, B.C.   ...

Justice O'Keefe     BETWEEN: SPIKE MARKS INC. Applicant   and   ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT   O’KEEFE J ... The DASs also indicated the amount of the excise and additional duties imposed under sections 42 and 43 of the Excise Act, 2001, S.C. 2002, c.-22 as a result of the reclassification. ... The Excise Act, 2001, S.C. 2002, c.22 :   2. The definitions in this section apply in this Act.   ...

Justice Annis   BETWEEN:   AGNAOU, YACINE       Applicant   and       ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA       Respondent           REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT            I.         ... As Justice Binnie noted in R v Regan, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 297, at paragraph 168, “the exercise of prosecutorial discretion is, within broad limits, effectively non-reviewable by the courts” ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT                 ...

Justice Zinn   BETWEEN:     STEPHEN ZOLOTOW       Plaintiff   and       THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA       Defendant                 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER     [1]                This action involves a visitor to Canada, 20 uncut diamonds, and the actions of the RCMP and customs officials.  ... Those charges were later stayed on March 15, 2002.   (v)                   On October 12, 2001, Mr. ... KIRVAN Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario            FOR THE DEFENDANT             ...

(T.D.) [2002] 2 F.C. 458 Date: 20011115 Docket: T-666-99 Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 1254 BETWEEN:                                                               ANTHONY J. TEMPLE                                                                                                                                                           Plaintiff                                                                                  and                                                         HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                             IN RIGHT OF CANADA as represented by                                             the MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE                                                                                                                                                       Defendant                                                             REASONS FOR ORDER BACKGROUND [1]                 This action involves a claim against the Defendant for misfeasance in the collection of assessments from now defunct companies, DPD Management Ltd. and A.J.F. ... Hargrave"                                                                                                           Prothonotary         Winnipeg, Manitoba November 15, 2001                           FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA                                        TRIAL DIVISION     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET:                   T-666-99 STYLE OF CAUSE: Anthony J. ...

IV.     Issues Arising from the Within Application for Judicial Review [12]   Mr. ... Questions of procedural fairness require the Court to determine whether the procedure followed by the decision-maker satisfied the level of procedural fairness required in the circumstances (Kazzi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 153 at para 21, [2017] FCJ No 129 (QL/Lexis); Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 SCC 1 at para 115, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3; Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817 at paras 21-22, 174 DLR (4th) 193). [14]   The issues relating to the Ezokola principles and aiding and abetting could be characterized in one of two ways. ... (superior) FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD   DOCKET: IMM-2933-18   STYLE OF CAUSE: SASA VELIMIROVIC v MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION   PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario   DATE OF HEARING: May 27, 2019   JUDGMENT AND REASONS: BELL J.   ...