Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

At the conclusion of the audit CRA assessed the Applicant’s Part XIII tax in respect of the fees paid by JP Morgan to JFAM for all its fiscal periods December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2008.  The Notices of Assessment were dated June 15, 2011 for 2002, 2003 and 2004 taxation years. ... Aalto” Case Management Judge                                 FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD     DOCKET:                                           T-1278-11   STYLE OF CAUSE:                          JP MORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (CANADA) INC. v. ...

There was no comment noted regarding his contribution to the team during the performance assessment and the previous assessments except in 2002, when he was paired with another employee ... JUDGMENT THE COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES t hat: [1]    The application for judicial review be dismissed; [2]    Each party assume its own costs.         “Orville Frenette” Deputy Judge                                                       FEDERAL COURT   SOLICITORS OF RECORD       DOCKET:                                           T-1485-06   STYLE OF CAUSE:                           PIERRE GIRARD v. ...

Salhab came to Canada in May 2002 and became a permanent resident. He did not declare Ms. Alameddine or Karim (born in February 2002) as dependants in his record of landing. ... Salhab failed to declare his dependants in 2002 but has not explained why Mr.  ...

Pumple and various other Tax Avoidance officers sending out letters and attached questionnaires, the subject of the present judicial review application. [13]            Between June 2002 and September 2002 there was a regular exchange of information between Investigations and Tax Avoidance. ... I also note that in June of 2002 the CCRA contemplated a form of the 27 August 2002 letter. ... In March 2002 the Investigations Division instructed the Audit Division to recommence gathering information for the 1998 taxation year. 5.         ...

This letter made no mention of mental distress or other medical grounds. [5]                The respondent, who received the request letter on May 30, 2002, treated it as a "first level" fairness relief request. [6]                By letter dated August 28, 2002, the respondent notified the applicant of its decision to refuse her request for relief from interest and penalties. ... Canada (2002), 225 F.T.R. 154, 2002 FCT 1171, Teitelbaum J. stated at paragraph 9: Subsection 220(3.1) of the Act confers discretion on the Minister with regard to waiving or cancelling penalties or interest. ... Justice Mackay noted in Alasdair MacKay v M.N.R., [2002] F.C.J. No. 323, 2002 FCT 234 (F.C.T.D.), this standard requires a high degree of deference by the reviewing court to the exercise of discretion, especially since the discretion concerns a relieving provision under the Income Tax Act. [31]            In reviewing the Minister's decision in cases such as this, the Court must adopt a pragmatic and functional analysis to determine the appropriate standard of review. ...

MARINE HOLDINGS LTD.                                                                Plaintiffs                                    and                               THE SHIP " EWA " MATSON NAVIGATION CO. ... The Queen [2002] 4 C.T.C. 93 (F.C.A.). [8]                 The Smithkline case is based on the Tax Court of Canada Rules for documentary discovery. ...

O'KEEFE BETWEEN:                                                                  BLAINE TANNER                                                                                                                                                        Applicant                                                                              - and-                                             THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA                                                                                                                                                    Respondent                                                REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER O'KEEFE J. [1]                 This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the National Parole Board dated August 21, 2000, wherein the pardon granted to the applicant by the National Parole Board on June 18, 1999 was revoked. [2]                 The applicant requests that the decision of the National Parole Board, dated August 21, 2000, be set aside, and his pardon be restored. Background [3]                 The applicant, Blaine Tanner, is an individual who applied for a pardon for previous convictions. [4]                 On January 9, 1975, the applicant was convicted for break, enter and theft. ... March 3, 2003                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA                                        TRIAL DIVISION     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD    DOCKET:                   T-1833-00 STYLE OF CAUSE: BLAINE TANNER- and- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA                                                           PLACE OF HEARING:                                   Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING:                                     Tuesday, September 24, 2002 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER OF O'KEEFE J. ...

The applicant's accountant submitted that the returns for the 2000, 2001, and 2002 taxation years were voluntarily disclosed and the applicant sought relief from penalties under the VDP ...   [9]         In my view, it is not correct for the applicant to argue that there was no evidence before the decision-maker of any inquiries being made by the CRA concerning the taxation years from 2000 through 2002.  ... Canada (Minister of National Revenue-M.N.R.), 2002 FCA 149 at paragraph 2; and Armstrong v. ...

Their objective was therefore to gain access to starting in the 2002 season. Traditional fishers in Area 12, who were not informed that Area 18 crab fishers would be participating in the February 19, 2002, advisory committee meeting, were opposed to this integration, especially at 5.32% of the TAC. [62]            Minister Thibault announced his first fishing plan on April 8, 2002 (Exhibits 360 and 365), and on April 12—since the 1997 Joint Project Agreement had expired the previous year—he signed a new Joint Project Agreement with fishers’ associations [2002 Joint Project Agreement] (Exhibit 366). ... G.                 The negotiations leading to the 2003 fishing plan [68]            In fall 2002, DFO asked traditional crab fishers whether they were interested in negotiating a multi-year agreement, and they were. ...

The Minister partly denied the applicant’s request for taxpayer relief and reassessment of the employment expenses he had claimed for the 2002 and 2003 taxation years. [2]                For the reasons discussed below, this application for judicial review will be dismissed. ... However, on the Rev99 form, the applicant stated that he was working 5 days a week from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm at the employer’s office. [11]            The applicant’s Taxpayer Relief requests were partly allowed for items that are not at stake in this application for judicial review, but denied with respect to his claimed employment expenses for 2002 and 2003, as well as the related GST rebate for 2002. ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario   For The Respondent       ...