Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖

. … If it is instead established on the facts that the taxpayer did not ordinarily reside at Location 2 before ordinarily residing at Location 3…[e]xpenses related to the sale of the residence at Location 1 would be considered expenses of the move from Location 1 to Location 3…. ...

…[W]e refer you to… 2002-0147325 …. 2 nd Situation. Same as 1 st situation except that, rather than subscribing for preferred shares of Holdco, Opco declares a dividend on its common shares (held by Mr. ...

. … The result...is that the tax-exempt margin made it possible for part of Oka’s surplus to be distributed to the appellants tax-free in a manner contrary to the object, spirit or purpose of section 84.1 of the Act. ...

. … For example, section 409A permits payments to be made as a result of a reduction in service to less than 20% of the previous level, a change in control of the employer or an unforeseeable emergency. ...

A could under subsection 20(12) opt to claim, in his 2014 Canadian income tax return, an amount of up to $400…[which] would reduce the amount of his “non-business income tax” for 2014 …. ...

CRA indicated that it was not prepared to extend its policy on farm-in arrangements to this situation (given that “carrying out the work on the claims does not give a right in the claims but potentially only an option to acquire them”), stating: Consequently … the amounts paid to carry out the work on the claims of Corporation B would be added to the cash payments provided for in the agreement and would be considered part of the overall consideration given by Corporation A to acquire a property. ...

. … We are not aware of any provisions of the Act permitting the division or allocation of tax withholding between a trust and its beneficiaries. ...

…[T]he CRA should not accept the adjustment request … as it would result in changes to the tax assessment for Year 1, which is a statute-barred year. ...

In this type of arrangement (or one where the employee only receives advances during the leave – in which case, it is not within the DSLP rules), the employee is entitled to a s. 8(1)(n) deduction as the advances are “repaid” (i.e., out of reduced pay cheques following the return to work). ...

. … [Respecting] the last condition…provided that at the time FA Finco receives the amount of penalty, FA Holdco continues to hold the shares of FA Opco that constitute a source of income for FA Holdco, the fourth condition of Clause D would be satisfied. ...