Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖

. … In order to determine whether an expense incurred by an employee, which was not expressly provided for in an employment contract, is in fact an implicit requirement of an office or employment, the courts have considered whether the fact of failure to comply could result in termination of employment, poor evaluation of employee performance or other disciplinary action by the employer. ...

. … [I]t appears that the property described in your letter is not tools. ...

Before concluding that “subsection 13(7.1) should apply … so that an election under subsection 13(7.4) would not be required,” CRA noted: In a situation where subsection 13(7.1) does not apply, the election under subsection 13(7.4) can be made in order that the capital cost to the taxpayer of the property is reduced by the amount of government assistance received. ...

. … The expectations of a knowledgeable and prudent investor should be determined on the assumption that there would be no delay, postponement or default in the payment of dividends, that the dividends would be paid each year at a predetermined fixed or floating rate and that the proceeds to be received by the investor on the disposition of the share are the same amount the corporation received as consideration on the issue of the share. ...

. … [T]he GAAR should not apply to the situation in this case because subsections 103(1) and (1.1) are of sufficient breadth to adjust the income-sharing terms agreed between the partners of the partnership. ...

According to … Copthorne, in determining whether a transaction is part of a series of transactions or events, it is necessary to determine whether the related transaction is carried out because of the series of transactions or events. ...

A, the Directorate first noted that “For this provision to apply, the CRA must establish that the disposition of Class "F" shares of the capital stock of Opco … was part of the series of transactions or events in which Opco acquired the Class "AA" shares of its capital stock for consideration less than their fair market value,” and then stated: Although the “because of” or “in relation to” test [in Copthorne] of related transactions does not require a strong nexus, it does require more than a mere possibility or a connection with an extreme degree of remoteness. ...

If in the light of the damages for the building and the scale of the work to be effected it turns out that a new property is acquired by the taxpayer, section 44 can apply …. ...

However, in the same year, the equipment was also used for a number of months on other farmland owned by them in a non-qualifying region – and the equipment was not used at all in the winter months. ...

BCo will transfer its business on a rollover basis to a newly formed subsidiary limited partnership (New LP) in consideration for the assumption of liabilities and the issuance of Class A units; and ACo will fund New LP from time to time in consideration for the issuance of Class B units (which are not described in the letter to have much difference from the Class A units – including equal per-unit allocations of income or loss- except as described below) at a subscription price equal to a valuation of the NAV per Class A unit and Class B unit. ...