Search - 辐射监测仪 校准

Filter by Type:

Results 23021 - 23030 of 23522 for 辐射监测仪 校准
FCTD

Optical Recording Corporation (Formerly Carrying on Business as Information Tunnel Research Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen and the Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 2 CTC 454, [1986] DTC 6569

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the respondent Minister and everyone under his direction and control be, and he is and they are prohibited from continuing with collection proceedings or actions against the applicant until it is lawful and fair to do one certain criterion for which being lawful assessment of Part VIII tax actually found and assessed to be owing, upon assessment of tax in regard to applicant’s filed return for its taxation year ended February 28, 1986. ...
FCA

Speedy Muffler King Corp., Formerly Discoverer Services Ltd. V., [1991] 1 CTC 323

., [1968] S.C.R. 140; [1968] C.T.C. 44; 68 D.T.C. 5001, is as follows: “... the production of articles for use from raw or prepared material by giving to these materials new forms, qualities and properties or combinations whether by hand or machinery. ...
TCC

Ferme Klosterhos Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen Rony Scherer v. Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth Scherer v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1996] 1 CTC 2934

.: Ferme Klosterhos Inc. (Klosterhos) is contesting income tax assessments made by the Minister of National Revenue (the Minister) for the 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991 taxation years. ...
TCC

Palardy v. R., [1997] 2 CTC 3024

If so determined, the second issue is whether the reassessment for the 1989 year is statute-barred or does the assessment fall within the provisions of subparagraph 152(4)(«)(i) of the Income Tax Act (the “Acf ’). ...
EC decision

Riedle Brewery Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1938-39] CTC 304, [1920-1940] DTC 430

The expenditures made by the appellant for treating, during the taxation period in question, were $4,206.40, shown in its books as "" treating expenses,'' or "‘treating at hotels,’’ while its disbursements for advertising otherwise were $331.29 for the same period, its total sales for the period being $154,000. ...
SCC

His Majesty the King v. Dominion Engineering Company Limited, [1944] CTC 216

. ^86(1) There shall be imposed, levied and collected a consumption or sales tax of eight per cent on the sale price of all goods, "‘(a) produced or manufactured in Canada, payable by the producer or manufacturer at the time of the delivery of such goods to the purchaser thereof. ...
EC decision

The Minister of National Revenue v. Mr. E., [1950] CTC 345

The statement therein contained was as follows: " In' compliance with the expressed wish of the annuitant, the date of maturity of this contract is hereby changed from March 24, 1954, to March 24, 1947. ...
TCC

Taylor v. The Queen, docket 96-705-GST-G

More precisely, having regard to the submissions of the parties, did each transaction give rise to an exempt supply as regards the Appellants. [57] Certain general provisions of the Goods and Services Tax portion of the Excise Tax Act should be kept in mind. [58] Section 165 enacts that every recipient of a taxable supply made in Canada shall pay to the Government of Canada tax in respect of the supply equal to 7 % of the value of the consideration for the supply, unless it is a zero-rated supply. [59] The definitions of certain terms and expressions of general import used in section 165 or elsewhere in the Excise Tax Act should be noted. ... "Alban Garon" J.T.C.C. [1]               Page 23b of the transcript, line 24 to page 24, line 12. [2]               Section 7 quoted above and referred to at the hearing of these appeals was amended by section 88, c. 10 of the Statutes of Canada, 1997 and was made retroactive to September 14, 1992 for certain purposes. ...
TCC

Cadillac Fairview Corp. Ltd. v. The Queen, 97 DTC 405, [1996] 2 CTC 2197 (TCC)

The usual rule and I see no reason why it should not apply in income tax appeals is set out in Odgers’ Principles of Pleading and Practice, 2nd edition at page 532: The “burden of proof” is the duty which lies on a party to establish his case. ...
SCC

Covert et al. v. Minister of Finance of Nova Scotia, [1980] CTC 437, [1980] 2 SCR 774

The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co, Ltd ([1897] AC 22; [1895-99] All ER Rep 33) has to be watched very carefully. ... This “sue for and recover” rule was followed in Re J Bibby & Sons, Ltd Pensions Trust Deed, Davies v IRC, [1952] 2 All ER 483. ... The principle of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd, supra, is still very much part of our law and in general the courts have rigidly applied it. ...

Pages