Search - 深圳居住证 办理条件 最新政策
Results 101 - 110 of 806 for 深圳居住证 办理条件 最新政策
Decision summary
Binder v. Saffron Rouge, 2008 DTC 6112, 2008 CanLII 1662 (Ont. S.C.J.) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
.)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission The taxpayers were incorporating shareholders of a corporation. ...
Decision summary
Amalgamation of Aylwards [1975] Ltd. (2001), 16 BLR (3d) 34, 610 APR 181, 2001 CanLII 32734 (Nfld. Sup. Ct. T.D.) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
.)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission A Newfoundland corporation was amalgamated with what was thought to be a wholly-owned subsidiary in a short-form amalgamation. ...
Decision summary
.Mac's Convenience Stores Inc. v. Couche-Tard Inc., 2012 DTC 5118 [at at 7149], 2012 QCCS 2745 (Queb Sup Ct), aff'd supra -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
., 2012 DTC 5118 [at at 7149], 2012 QCCS 2745 (Queb Sup Ct), aff'd supra-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission The taxpayer paid a $136 million dividend to the non-resident corporate defendant when it was indebted to the defendant. ...
Decision summary
Re Columbia North Realty Co., 2006 DTC 6124, 2005 NSSC 212 (NSSC) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
., 2006 DTC 6124, 2005 NSSC 212 (NSSC)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission On two occasions, a Nova Scotia company ("Columbia") made cash distributions to its non-resident shareholder, purportedly as distributions of paid-up capital. ...
Decision summary
W. Nevill & Co. Ltd. v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1937), 4 A.T.D. 187 (HC) -- summary under Contract or Option Cancellation
Nevill & Co. Ltd. v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1937), 4 A.T.D. 187 (HC)-- summary under Contract or Option Cancellation Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(b)- Capital Expenditure v. Expense- Contract or Option Cancellation In finding that instalments of a lump sum payment made by the taxpayer to a joint managing director in consideration of his cancelling his employment agreement with the company were expenditures of a capital nature, Dixon J. stated (at p.197) that the lump sum: "... was made for the purpose of organising the staff and as part of the necessary expenses of conducting the business. ...
Decision summary
Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc., [2009] 1 S.C.R. 15 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
., [2009] 1 S.C.R. 15-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission no prior oral agreement The parties entered into an employment contract that included a restrictive covenant, providing that the defendant would not be employed in the business of insurance brokerage within the "Metropolitan City of Vancouver" for three years after leaving employment with the plaintiff. ...
Decision summary
MacKinlay v. Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL) -- summary under Paragraph 18(1)(h)
Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Paragraph 18(1)(h) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(h) The policy of a firm of accountants was to reimburse its partners for various costs of their moving their residence from one city to another at the request of the executive partnership committee. Lord Oliver stated: "... It is inescapable as it seems to me, that the expenditure, motivated no doubt by the fact of moving house, which in turn was motivated by the desire to put the partner concerned in a better position to further the interests of the firm, was an expenditure serving and necessarily and inherently intended to serve the personal interests of the partner in establishing his private residence for himself and his family and it cannot be said to be exclusively for the purposes of the partnership practice. ...
Decision summary
Fairmont Hotels Inc. v. A.G. Canada, 2015 ONCA 441, aff'g 2014 ONSC 7302, leave granted, SCC docket 36606 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
Canada, 2015 ONCA 441, aff'g 2014 ONSC 7302, leave granted, SCC docket 36606-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission continuing non-specific intention to maintain a tax neutral structure In order to facilitate the acquisition in 2002 of a hotel in Washington by a REIT ("Legacy") of which it was the manager, Fairmont Hotels Inc. ... " In dismissing the crown's appeal, Simmons JA stated (at paras. 10, 12): Juliar … does not require that the party seeking rectification must have determined the precise mechanics or means by which the party's settled intention to achieve a specific tax outcome would be realized. ...
Decision summary
Canada Life Insurance Company of Canada v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ONCA 562 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ONCA 562-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission a transaction resulting from a tax mistake should not be remedied under the Court’s general equitable jurisdiction A Canada Life subsidiary (CLICC) clearly intended to realize an accrued loss on its LP interest in a subsidiary partnership by winding it up. ... CLICC … does not ask the court to rescind the entire Transaction, and to restore it and its affiliates to their original rights, because to do so would not achieve its objective of triggering a loss to set off against its foreign exchange gains. ...
Decision summary
Attorney General of Canada v. Juliar, 2000 DTC 6589, 50 OR (3d) 728, 2000 CanLII 16883 (Ont CA) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
Juliar, 2000 DTC 6589, 50 OR (3d) 728, 2000 CanLII 16883 (Ont CA)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission The Court confirmed the decision of the trial judge, to rectify an agreement for the transfer by the appellants of half the shares of a company to a newly-incorporated holding company so as to reflect consideration that was treasury shares of the holding company rather than promissory notes, on the basis of the trial judge's finding that "the true agreement between the parties here was the acquisition of the half interest... in a manner that would not attract immediate liability for income tax" and a finding that the parties would have chosen to receive shares but for the mistaken belief of the advising accountant that the transferred shares had full cost base. ...