Search - 枣庄市市中区 智博公考 地址 电话

Development Securities (No. 9) Ltd & Ors v HMRC, [2017] UKFTT 565 (TC), rev'd [2019] UKUT 169 but FTT decision confirmed at [2020] EWCA Civ 1705-- summary under Subsection 2(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 2- Subsection 2(1) a Jersey sub, whose board approved in Jersey a decision contrary to the sub’s interests, resided in the U.K. ... Morgan J first noted (at paras 406, 412): …In reality, … the [Jersey] companies’ real business was to undertake the parent’s plan for the realisation of enhanced capital losses through the acquisition of assets at an overvalue under call option arrangements. … It is inherent in the uncommercial nature of what was proposed or, in other words, that lack of any commercial benefit … that the board were undertaking to implement the necessary steps from the outset on the “say so” of the parent (subject to the legality issue). … In finding that the Jersey companies had their central management and control in the U.K. at all relevant times, so that the appeal was dismissed, she concluded (at paras 426 and 430): Unlike Wood v Holden … this was not a case where the board considered a proposal and, having taken appropriate advice, decided that it was in the best interests of the companies to enter into it. ... The Jersey board were simply administering a decision they were instructed to undertake by DS Plc, in checking the legality of the plan and then administering the other consequent actions prior to handing over completely to the UK group. … In effect, the Jersey board merely rubber stamped the decision to move control back to the UK, having fulfilled the terms of their engagement. ...

., 2020 ONSC 5343-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission jurisdiction declined in a requested shareholding rectification whose raison d’être was a CRA assessment In order to avoid a deemed disposition under the s. 104(4) 21-year deemed realization rule, two family trusts for the children of Mr. ... In declining to assume jurisdiction, Koehnen J stated (at paras 32, 35): … [T]he Tax Court has jurisdiction to interpret s. 23(3) of the OBCA. … Parliament has created a specific court with expertise in tax matters and has created a specific process to address tax issues. ... The corporate records accurately reflect that intention. … [T]he applicants do not require a court order to correct the books and records of the Child Corporations. ...

The Queen, 2015 TCC 225-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt constructive receipt by relieving obligation to pay pharmacist The appellant ("Great-West") provided prescription drug plans to the employees of various employers. ... See summaries under Financial Services and Financial Institutions (GST/HST) Regulations, s. 4(2) and s. 123(1) – financial service – (f.1) and (r.4). ...

A.G. of Canada, 2015 QCCA 837-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission thin cap issues were not considered at time of paying a dividend The appellant, which was a wholly-owned Ontario subsidiary of a Quebec corporation ("CTI"), paid a $136 million dividend to CTI in connection with a "Quebec shuffle" transaction. ... In finding that the appellant could not retroactively rectify the dividend so as to be a stated capital distribution instead, and after noting (at para. 34) that AES and Riopel dealt with related parties committing an error in giving effect to a "legitimate corporate transaction for the purpose of avoiding, deferring or minimizing tax" and correcting "that error to achieve the tax consequences originally and specifically intended and agreed upon," Schrager JA stated (at para. 43): The payment of the 136 million dollar dividend to CTI was intended and was effected. … Reduction of capital was not intended. The unintended consequences of the dividend, by ricochet, resulted from the thin capitalization rules and was not part and parcel of the transaction. … There was no common intention of the parties regarding these rules as they were never contemplated and so cannot be the object of a meeting of the minds to which a court can give effect. ...

The Queen, 2017 TCC 21 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development no SR&ED without testing The taxpayer was a natural health product company. ... Dahl that is fatal to this appeal. … Boyle J further stated (at para 53): My decision in this case is in no way intended to suggest that literature reviews and consultations with other researchers cannot be qualifying activities giving rise to qualifying expenses as legitimate constituent parts of SR&ED activities. … ...

The Queen, 2018 TCC 1 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt giving a spouse access to a joint account was not payment to her The taxpayer was a market dealer with a securities dealer (“WCM”), which provided support in the form of an assistant, shared with others and it answered “no” to the question in the T2200 as to whether the contract of employment required the taxpayer to pay for an assistant. ... Miller J dismissed the case, finding (at paras 11, 13 and 14): … There are no cheques to Ms. ... I conclude there is not. … I do not see how anything has been paid or expended to Ms. ...

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2021 FCA 88-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development requirement for use of the scientific method in SR&ED The taxpayer acknowledged that the work performed by it for which it claimed investment tax credits did not follow the scientific method as described in Northwest Hydraulic, but argued (at para. 6) that “there was no reference to ‘scientific method’ in the text of the definition [of SR&ED]” and, therefore, that requirement should not have been applied to it. In rejecting this submission, Webb JA stated (at para. 8): Kam-Press did not address any … decisions of this Court [endorsing the criteria set out in Northwest Hydraulic] or provide any basis upon which these cases should not be followed. There is no basis to overturn Northwest Hydraulics or the decisions of this Court that have adopted the approach to be followed, as set out therein, to determine if a particular project or activity qualifies as SR&ED. … ...

Revenue and Customs v NCL Investments Ltd & Anor, [2022] UKSC 9-- summary under Contract Modification or Grant Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(b)- Capital Expenditure v. Expense- Contract Modification or Grant employee stock option expenses were as a general matter sustained on income account The taxpayers, which were required by s. 46 of Corporation Tax Act 2009 to calculate the “profits of [their] trade … in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, subject to any adjustment required or authorised by law,” were found by the Court to be thereby authorized to deduct the expenses (“Debits”) recognized under IFRS when they granted stock options to employees through an employee benefit trust established by their parent. In finding that this deduction was not precluded by s. 53 of the same Act, which provided that “[i]n calculating the profits of a trade, no deduction is allowed for items of a capital nature,” Lord Hamblen and Lady Rose accepted (at para. 55) the findings of the First-tier Tribunal that the taxpayers’ “employees operate in a professional services business whose success depends on the availability of skilled and motivated professionals and the grant of share options to those employees is part of their remuneration package” and that the “Debits were … recurring costs that had a connection with the Appellants’ earning of income ….” ...

The King, 2024 TCC 1 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt salary paid into her husband’s bank account was constructively received by the employee The appellant, a real estate brokerage firm, determined (based on agreement between its two employees) that the remuneration paid to them would be allocated as to $165,000 and $192,000 to Mrs. and Mr. ... Moreover, an amount of money is deemed received by an employee when it is available to the employee. … … [C]onstructive receipt applies with respect to Mrs. ...

MNR, 92 DTC 1497 (TCC)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt payment references funds transfer A taxpayer was ordered in 1984 to retain arrears of alimentary allowance that had accumulated from March 1983 onward to be applied against an amount owing to him by his estranged wife. In finding that the alimentary allowance was not "paid" by him for purposes of s. 60(b), and was not "received" by her for purposes of s. 56(1)(b), Garon J. stated (p. 1499): "... ...