Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Leddy, former president of the University, testified that “... for all practical purposes we had subsumed and partially assimilated these two societies at the University of Windsor.. ...

The amounts of revenues and expenses with respect to the property, appearing in the Minister’s reply and not contested by the appellants are as follows: Year Revenues Expenses Loss 1977 $ 500 $3,612 ($3,112) 1978 $1,625 $4,791 ($3,166) 1979 $1,100 $5,296 ($4,196) 1980 $2,443 $7,599 ($5,156) 1981 $4,050 $5,627 ($1,577) The expenses claimed by the appellants in 1978 and 1979 (the years actually under appeal) were $2,395 and $2,648 respectively (Exhibits R-l and R-2) and the corresponding losses for each of the appellants for those years was $1,582.99 and $2,097.90. ...

.: — This appeal is from the 1993 taxation year. Mrs. Emmons claims a disability tax credit under section 118.3 of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”). ...

.: — This appeal was heard on October 29, 30 and 31, 1996 at Sudbury, Ontario. ...

.: — The Appellant elected, in his Notice of Appeal, the informal procedure when he appealed his assessment of income tax for the 1992 taxation year. ...

.: — The Court is now prepared to give Reasons for Judgment in the appeal between Rosemarie Evertz and Her Majesty the Queen, 94-979(IT)G, and Dieter Evertz and Her Majesty the Queen, 94-980(IT)G. ...

.: — This appeal is from an assessment for the appellant’s 1992 taxation year. ...

.: — The appeal of John Harrison was heard on the 8th of July 1996 in the city of Sault Ste. ...

.: — These are appeals heard in Toronto, Ontario, on July 31, 1996, under the Informal Procedure, against assessments in which the Minister of National Revenue disallowed claims for the Disability Tax Credit in the years 1992, 1993 and 1994, as provided under Section 118.3 and 118.4 of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”). ...

Law Society (British Columbia)^* [5] and Rudolph Wolff & Co. v. Canada®, [6] and concluded that, applying the principles set out there, the exclusion of prison inmates from the class of persons eligible to receive the tax credits was not discrimination contrary to section 15 of the Charter. ...