Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Results 12751 - 12760 of 13531 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC

Merrins v. MNR, 91 DTC 699, [1991] 2 CTC 2045 (TCC)

In this regard, the appellant referred to certain authorities including Ass'n of Radio & Television Employees of Canada (CUPE-CLC) v. ...
TCC

Stokesly Investments Ltd. v. MNR, 96 DTC 1754, TCJ. No. 1146, [1996] 3 CTC 2928 (Informal Procedure)

.: The issues in this appeal are: 1. Whether the following sums in the following years claimed as non-capital losses by the Appellant are deductible, 1982: $75,304.38 1983: $31,456.26 1984: $23,353.89 1985: $6,909.06 2. ...
TCC

Phillips v. The Queen, 95 DTC 194, [1994] 2 CTC 2416 (TCC)

The appellant is the president and controlling shareholder of Trans World Oil & Gas Ltd. ...
TCC

Craig M. Van De Water v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 276, [1991] 1 CTC 2200 (TCC)

The Random House Dictionary of the English Language gives the following definition: ”... close to a point or place not far away. ...
TCC

Horkoff v. The Queen, 97 DTC 621, [1996] 3 CTC 2737 (TCC)

.: These appeals were heard jointly on common evidence at Calgary, Alberta on August 8, 1996 pursuant to the General Procedure. ...
TCC

Kaye v. The Queen, docket 97-2772-IT-I (Informal Procedure)

He or she would also consider whether the person claiming to be in business has gone about it in an orderly, businesslike way and in the way that a business person would normally be expected to do. [6] This leads to a further consideration that of reasonableness. ...
TCC

Rudzik v. M.N.R., docket 97-532-UI

" [8] At page 5029, he said: "... I interpret Lord Wright's test not as the fourfold one it is often described as being but rather as a four-in-one test with emphasis always retained on what Lord Wright, supra, calls 'the combined force of the whole scheme of operations', even while the usefulness of the four subordinate criteria is acknowledged. ...
TCC

Lloyd v. M.N.R., docket 97-1741-UI

(o/a Coach Restaurant & Saloon), for the period July 17, 1995 to March 8, 1996. ...
TCC

Blanco Estate v. The Queen, docket 95-4042-IT-G

The company acquired the Malibu Bar & Grill in September 1989 and the Appellant advanced the amount of $100,000 from personal cash reserves of her spouse to the company for the purpose of completing the purchase transaction. ...
TCC

McKichan v. M.N.R., docket 97-1016-UI

At that time, they raised capital and became shareholders in proportion to the capital they had raised or guaranteed, as follows: Norman Hodgins- 40% Bruce McKichan- 35% John Arnold   - 25% The shareholdings have remained the same except that Norman Hodgins transferred his 40% ownership to his son, Doug Hodgins. ...

Pages