Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Results 231 - 240 of 8040 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC (summary)
Concept Danat Inc. v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 32 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development
The Queen, 2019 TCC 32 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development using existing equipment in developing a new product was not R&D The taxpayer, whose business was to embroider or imprint publicizing lettering on clothing engaged in three projects, none of which were found by Lafleur J to qualify as SR&ED. ... Similarly, I am not of the opinion that there was any advancement in the technology; in fact, this Court previously ruled that the newness of a product is not sufficient for demonstrating a technological advancement (Zeuter …). ...
Decision summary
The Trustees of the Morrison 2002 Maintenance Trust & Ors v Revenue and Customs, [2019] EWCA Civ 93 -- summary under Tax Avoidance
The Trustees of the Morrison 2002 Maintenance Trust & Ors v Revenue and Customs, [2019] EWCA Civ 93-- summary under Tax Avoidance Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Tax Avoidance Three “Scottish Trusts” exercised their put to sell shares of a listed public company to trusts (the “Irish Trusts”) with similar terms for the shares’ cost base of £4.5M; and the Irish Trusts sold the same shares eight days later to Merrill Lynch for £14.3M, who then sold the shares into the market. ... Newey LJ stated (at paras. 56-57) that he agreed with the First-tier Tribunal: that the sale to Merrill Lynch "sufficiently corresponded to the scheme as planned" and … it "would be extraordinary if the application of the Ramsay approach could be defeated by the sale being to brokers rather than to the market by brokers on behalf of the Irish Trustees" …. ...
TCC (summary)
Richard A. Bureau Barrister & Solicitor Incorporated v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 119 -- summary under Paragraph 305(5)(b)
Bureau Barrister & Solicitor Incorporated v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 119-- summary under Paragraph 305(5)(b) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 305- Subsection 305(5)- Paragraph 305(5)(b) application granted based on registrant awaiting ITA assessments The appellant (“RBBSI”), a legal professional corporation for Mr. ... As well … procedural gaffes are not so egregious as to require or demand denial of this application. Regarding the test in s. 305(5)(b)(iv), he stated (at para. 18) that “there is a semblance of logic to … [RBBSI’s] position, sufficient to constitute reasonable grounds for appealing.” ...
TCC (summary)
Richard A. Bureau Barrister & Solicitor Incorporated v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 119 -- summary under Paragraph 166.2(5)(b)
Bureau Barrister & Solicitor Incorporated v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 119-- summary under Paragraph 166.2(5)(b) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 166.2- Subsection 166.2(5)- Paragraph 166.2(5)(b) just and equitable for taxpayer to be granted an extension unless a clear rationale for declining In granting an extension for an incorporated lawyer to appeal HST assessments to the Tax Court, Russell J accepted the testimony of the lawyer that his strategy was to see if anticipated income tax reassessments (both of his professional corporation and him personally) might assist the corporation’s HST position in its HST appeal. ... As well … procedural gaffes are not so egregious as to require or demand denial of this application. ... Russell J stated in this regard (at para. 18) that “there is a semblance of logic to … [the corporation’s] position, sufficient to constitute reasonable grounds.” ...
TCC (summary)
Logix Data Products Inc. v. The Queen, 2021 TCC 36 -- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development
The Queen, 2021 TCC 36-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development alleged SR&ED work was routine engineering The taxpayer was an information technology company that undertook development of dual-purpose shingle sized solar panels that would be indistinguishable at street level from asphalt shingles. In finding that the taxpayer’s work did not qualify as SR&ED, Monaghan J indicated that: she was “not convinced the Appellant had adequate information about the state of relevant knowledge in the field to assess whether there was a technological uncertainty” (para. 76).. solutions identified by the taxpayer to identified challenges, e.g., adding an air gap beneath the shingles to avoid over-heating, and adding support to deal with snow weight issues, appeared “to be the application of routine engineering” (para. 89). the taxpayer’s test results summary pages lacked significant details of the tests’ purposes, the observations made and conclusions drawn. furthermore, the “jurisprudence indicates that the documentation should be contemporaneous” whereas here it seemed likely that “the schematics and test descriptions the Appellant provided were … prepared.. when the CRA asked the Appellant for supporting documentation,” and similarly for testing summaries (para. 139). ...
FCA (summary)
Ristorante a Mano Limited v. Canada (National Revenue), 2022 FCA 151 -- summary under Payment & Receipt
Canada (National Revenue), 2022 FCA 151-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt net tips on restaurant credit card sales distributed to the servers were earnings "paid" to them The appellant, which operated a restaurant, paid “due-backs” to its servers representing the tips on sales processed on credit and debit cards (“electronic tips”) minus deductions made by it as a processing charge and amounts to be paid to kitchen staff, and further deductions based on the amount of cash sales collected by the servers. Monaghan JA indicated (at para. 52) that the question of whether a due-back constituted pensionable salary and wages for purposes of the Canada Pension Plan Act, or insurable earnings for purposes of the Employment Insurance Act, turned on the “question … whether, based on the relevant facts in the case, the amount in question is paid by the employer to the employee in respect of their employment.” ...
TCC (summary)
Canafric Inc. v. The King, 2023 TCC 108 -- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development
The King, 2023 TCC 108-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development developing new pie recipes was SR&ED Canafric operated a food manufacturing business specializing in developing frozen pies for grocery chains and restaurants. ... Canafric averaged around six projects a year in which it would elaborate a recipe designed to meet the client’s requirements, test the recipe and send the sample product to a “taste panel” for evaluation – and evaluate the reasons for any failure. ...
Decision summary
PepsiCo, Inc v Commissioner of Taxation, [2024] FCAFC 86 -- summary under Payment & Receipt
PepsiCo, Inc v Commissioner of Taxation, [2024] FCAFC 86-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt there can be no payment by direction unless there is an antecedent obligation by the creditor to the third party A U.S. company (PepsiCo) entered into an “exclusive bottling appointment” (“EBA”) with an independent Australian bottling company (the “Bottler”) pursuant to which an Australian subsidiary of PepsiCo (the “Seller”) sold concentrate to the Bottler and PepsiCo granted the Bottler the right to use the Pepsi and Mountain Dew trademarks in connection with its sales of the soft drinks. Before finding that the payments made by the Bottler to the Seller were not derived by PepsiCo, so that the latter could not be subject to the Australian withholding tax on trademark royalties paid to a non-resident, Perram and Jackman JJ stated (at para. 40): It is well established that a direction by a creditor to a debtor to pay a third party constitutes a payment to the creditor. … Nevertheless, it is also recognised that there can be no payment by direction unless there is an antecedent monetary obligation owed by the Bottler to PepsiCo/SVC…. ...
Decision summary
Pyxis Real Estate Equities Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 ONCA 65 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
Canada (Attorney General), 2025 ONCA 65-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission capital dividends were agreed to be paid in amounts that overlooked a CDA deficit: no rectification A plan was implemented for successive capital dividends to be paid up a chain of corporations so that the individual who was the ultimate shareholder could have a tax-free receipt of $1.4 million. ... …The corporate resolutions that were signed … accurately reflect the agreement. ...
EC summary
Blauer v. MNR, 71 DTC 5113, [1971] CTC 154 (F.C.T.A.), briefly aff'd 75 DTC 5076, [1975] CTC 112 (SCC) -- summary under Payment & Receipt
.), briefly aff'd 75 DTC 5076, [1975] CTC 112 (SCC)-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt post-dated cheque A post-dated cheque was payable for purposes of ss. 12(1)(l) and 76(1) on its date rather than the date of delivery. ...