Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Results 541 - 550 of 1037 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC (summary)
9118-5322 Québec inc. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 96 -- summary under Paragraph 254(5)(a)
. … [T]he builder simply cannot grant the credit without having already received the prescribed form of the purchaser as described in paragraph 254(4)(c). ... After indicating that there was an imperative requirement in the wording of s. 254(5)(a) that the builder forward the purchaser forms with its return claiming the rebate amount, she stated (at para. 64): Consequently, the builder who has not conformed with the requirements of s. 254(5)(a) cannot deduct an amount in this regard in the computation of its net tax …. ...
TCC (summary)
Patterson Dental Canada Inc. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 112, aff'd 2020 FCA 40 -- summary under Paragraph 2(e)
. … There is no doubt in my mind that the epinephrine and its salts and the anesthetic solutions containing epinephrine supplied by the appellant come within the definition of the term “drug” as defined under the Canadian Food and Drugs Act … However, drugs which have epinephrine as their sole active ingredient are different from those that have epinephrine combined with another active ingredient, such as the anesthetics in issue. ...
TCC (summary)
Landbouwbedrijf Backx B.V. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 142, confirmed on s. 2(1) grounds, remitted for reconsideration on s. 128.1(1)(c) and Treaty grounds 2019 FCA 310 -- summary under Subsection 2(1)
Such evidence must clearly establish that the “outsider” … has “effective” or “independent” management and control. … Ms. ...
TCC (summary)
CBS Canada Holdings Co. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 188, aff'd 2020 FCA 4 -- summary under Subsection 169(3)
After finding that a settlement agreement had been reached (given the parties’ mutual intention to create legal relations, the flowing of consideration, sufficiently clear terms, and a matching on all essential terms), Lyons J went on to note (at para. 62) that: University Hill … reaffirmed the principles in Galway and CIBC and commented that settling the quantum of expenses is not an all or nothing function and involved a compromise of facts, therefore, “the Court will only interfere if the agreed‑upon facts clearly have no bearing to reality.” In finding that this “bearing to reality” test was satisfied, she stated (at paras. 77 and 78): I … find that the [non-capital loss] existed and was available for carry-forward to the March 2007 TY having flowed from the Pool from years prior to the 2007 Years that had been reassessed by the Minister based on the CRA records which included CBS’ filings. ...
TCC (summary)
Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 263 -- summary under Subsection 147(3)
The taxpayer had made an offer to the Minister on what C Miller J had described as a principled basis, namely, that the Minister would apply GAAR to GBL’s 2006 to 2013 years – but not to the earlier years on the basis that they were not covered by waivers provided. The Crown rejected this offer and made its own offer (which was made too close to trial to qualify under Rule 147(3.2), and was also rejected) that provided a concession on the characterization of foreign exchange gains and losses realized by GBL In finding that the Crown should not receive an award of costs notwithstanding its total success, C Miller J stated (at para. 11): [T]he Respondent had success in the ultimate result, but it was due to the one issue – the conduct of business principally with persons with whom it did not deal at arm’s length. ...
TCC (summary)
Poirier v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 8 -- summary under Subsection 297(1)
. … [I]it is only relevant to determine whether the Minister acted “with all due dispatch” during the two months that followed receipt of the application from the Builder and I have no difficulty in concluding that the Minister has satisfied that requirement. Even if the issue had been whether the Minister had acted “with all due dispatch” in the 12 months or so that followed receipt, I would have found that this was an acceptable period of time. … Words and Phrases with all due dispatch ...
TCC (summary)
Monsell v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 5 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subsection 160(1)
However … the CRA lost or destroyed the documents. In light of this evidence, it would be unfair to place the onus on the appellants. In finding that for the 2007 year, the onus was instead on the taxpayers, and before finding that they had failed to discharge this onus, she stated (at para. 29): The appellants had available to them Newgate’s 2007 income tax return, as well as that of its associated corporation …. ...
TCC (summary)
Montecristo Jewellers Inc. v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 31, aff'd 2020 FCA 12 -- summary under Paragraph 142(1)(a)
After quoting with approval the position in Memorandum 3.3 as to the meaning of "delivery" and "made available" (signifying constructive delivery) and quoting with approval the statement in Marshall and Van Allen v Crown Assets Disposal Corporation, [1956] OR 930 (Ont CA) that “Delivery is accomplished by the purchaser obtaining the actual physical possession of the goods or, if certain conditions are present, there may be a symbolical delivery which divests the seller's possession,” she stated (at paras. 99, 104): … [T]he focus in section 142 is on “delivered”. Generally, that equates to delivery of a full voluntary transfer of possession of the property to the buyer immediately upon physical possession by the buyer without restriction. … Clearly, Customers were given full possession of the Jewellery at the time these were hand delivered, before or after airport security. ...
TCC (summary)
Zdzieblowska v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 40 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subsection 296(2.1)
. … When making the subsection 297(2.1) assessment for the overpayment of the rebate, the Minister must consider subsection 296(2.1) since she is assessing an amount that became payable by the person under Part IX of the Act. … Since the Appellant was assessed, pursuant to subsection 297(2.1), an amount payable of $24,000 under section 264, the Minister should have considered subsection 296(2.1) when issuing the assessment in respect of the New Housing Rebate. ...
TCC (summary)
Colitto v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 88 -- summary under Paragraph 227.1(2)(a)
Colitto’s liability arose pursuant to section 227.1 … in his 2011 taxation year and was not in respect of his 2008 taxation year” (para. 48) – so that the condition in s. 160(1)(e)(ii) quoted above was not satisfied. ...