Search - 微信撤回和删除的区别 官方

The Queen, 2003 DTC 1410, 2003 TCC 674 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development Various efforts made by the taxpayer to improve the accuracy of a freight weighing device did not qualify given that there was "some merit" in the Crown expert's contention that the manner in which the taxpayer proceeded was akin to the use of routine or standard engineering practices, it was difficult to understand what hypothesis, if any, was made and what steps were being proposed to eliminate the technological uncertainty if one existed, and virtually no records were kept of any hypotheses tested and of results as the work progressed. ...

., 98 DTC 1839, [1998] 3 CTC 2520 (TCC)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development 5 factors test The taxpayer was an engineering consultant firm that specialized in the development, management and protection of water resources. ...

The Queen, 2011 DTC 1282 [at at 1592], 2011 TCC 391-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development D'Arcy J. denied the taxpayer's claimed SR&ED credits arising from the development of various electrical systems for use in wheelchairs- a power optimizer to switch power between the front and back wheels of a wheelchair or scooter, an inhibitor to ensure that a wheelchair remain stationary while being charged, a virtual battery system to derive 36 volts of potential from two 12-volt batteries, and a multi-voltage output charger. ...

The Queen, 98 DTC 1877, [1998] 4 CTC 2618 (TCC)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development The taxpayer, which was engaged in researching and developing advanced data management and memory management software systems for large mainframe computers, and which had adopted the proxy method for calculating SR&ED expenditures, was able to include in s. 37(8)(a)(ii)(B)(I) the cost of a dedicated telephone line that was used to pass instructions and data from the taxpayer's employees in Ottawa (none of whom left Canada) to the staff of an independent company in Birmingham, Alabama whose mainframe computer the taxpayer was leasing for testing purposes. ...

The Queen, 2015 DTC 1135 [at at 859], 2015 TCC 65 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development development of code analysis software entailed standard techniques Lamarre ACJ found that the taxpayer's development of code analysis software for websites was not experimental development. ...

The Queen, 2020 TCC 47, aff'd 2022 FCA 72-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development programming costs were not SR&ED The taxpayer (“National”), which provided consulting services to clients, claimed to have made SR&ED expenditures of $68,029 and generated investment tax credits of $23,810 in connection with developing a computer program that would automate aspects filing SR&ED claims with the CRA through a web-based, cross-platform and cross-browser framework to track claimable SR&ED projects. ...

The King, 2025 TCC 63-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development purported SR&ED was routine engineering conducted by trial and error In confirming the denial of the claim of the taxpayer that it had engaged in experimental development in building mobile direct-contact water heaters for use in fracking, Spiro, J. found that: there was an absence of any expert evidence demonstrating technological risks or uncertainties which could not have been removed by routine engineering or standard procedures, and the work could instead be characterized as routine engineering. the taxpayer could not identify hypotheses that were tested by its work, which could instead be characterized as having been conducted by trial and error; it had not been demonstrated that the work constituted a technological advance; and insufficient records were kept. ...

" In making its “with a view to profit” determination, the Court noted that the following principles generally were common ground: [S]haring profits … [is] not an essential characteristic of a partnership [citing Young v. ... It follows that the complex mosaic of generally accepted accounting practice … will generally have little part to play. Fourth … the view to profit need not be the predominant subjective purpose, but it must be part of the partners' subjective purpose. ...

(Canada), 2015 DTC 5067 [at at 5904], 2015 ABQB 327-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission requested rectification order to fix bump did not match parties' specific plan at closing The Bump Mistake A predecessor in interest of the applicant ("Viking") entered a multi-step acquisition and restructuring transaction to acquire an arm's length corporation ("Krang"). ... Dario J dismissed the taxpayer's application, stating (at paras. 77, 81 and 82): [T]his is not a case of the parties "wrote it down wrong", but rather the parties got it wrong. … To the extent we are talking only about the increased bump room due to the Krang Debt, the evidence does not establish that the inability to benefit from this tax treatment would have terminated the acquisition, or that the common intent of the parties that drove them to the formation of the transaction was frustrated. … The intent to complete a transaction in the most tax efficient manner possible is not sufficiently specific. ...

BLP Group plc v Commissioners of Customs & Excise, [1995] EUECJ C-4/94 (ECJ (5th Chamber))-- summary under Supply Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Supply mere borrowing of money is not a supply BLP was a management holding company which provided services to a group of trading companies producing goods for use in the furniture and DIY industries. ... In finding that taking out a loan did not involve a VATable transaction by the borrower at all, even if it pays interest (it was the mere recipient of a service provided by the lender) the Court stated (at para. 47): The taking up of a loan and the selling of an interest in a company are not … operations of the same type for the purposes of the VAT system — nor are they, moreover, for an undertaking's operational purposes, since the income from the sale of shares is part of the undertaking's own resources, whereas the loan is part of its borrowed resources — because that system focuses on transactions and makes a clear distinction between taxable and exempt transactions. ...