Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

Nevill & Co. Ltd. v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1937), 4 A.T.D. 187 (HC)-- summary under Contract or Option Cancellation Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(b)- Capital Expenditure v. Expense- Contract or Option Cancellation In finding that instalments of a lump sum payment made by the taxpayer to a joint managing director in consideration of his cancelling his employment agreement with the company were expenditures of a capital nature, Dixon J. stated (at p.197) that the lump sum: "... was made for the purpose of organising the staff and as part of the necessary expenses of conducting the business. ...

Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Paragraph 18(1)(h) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(h) The policy of a firm of accountants was to reimburse its partners for various costs of their moving their residence from one city to another at the request of the executive partnership committee. Lord Oliver stated: "... It is inescapable as it seems to me, that the expenditure, motivated no doubt by the fact of moving house, which in turn was motivated by the desire to put the partner concerned in a better position to further the interests of the firm, was an expenditure serving and necessarily and inherently intended to serve the personal interests of the partner in establishing his private residence for himself and his family and it cannot be said to be exclusively for the purposes of the partnership practice. ...

Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer, [1993] WWR 374, 8 BLR (2d) 280 (Alta. ... & Mrs. Maplesden) that Mr. Maplesden finance a home purchase through a loan from one of the operating corporations owned by them, that the home be registered in Mrs. ...

Customs & Excise Commissioners, [1997] BTC 5355 (C.A.)-- summary under Business Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Business In finding that the taxpayer, which exercised delegated powers to issue licenses and certificates to its members and exercised public control over those engaged in financial services, auditing and insolvency practice, was not engaged in a "business", Beldam L.J. referred to community jurisprudence that rested on the touchstone of "economic activities" and then stated (at p. 5365): "... ...

Ernst & Young LLP, 2015 BCCA 445-- summary under Negligence, Fiduciary Duty and Fault Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Negligence, Fiduciary Duty and Fault accounting firm exclusion clause was binding The appellant’s B.C. law firm retained Ernst & Young to provide her with U.S. tax advice in connection with negotiating a separation agreement with her husband. ...

Associated Newspapers Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs, [2017] EWCA Civ 54, [2017] BVC 10-- summary under Subsection 141.01(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 141.01- Subsection 141.01(2) acquisition made for free on-supply was part of overhead of a commercial activity A UK newspaper (ANL) paid VAT on its purchase of vouchers from Marks & Spencer and an intermediary ("Hut"), which it then provided free to those readers subscribing to its Sunday editions for the promotional period. ...

Leekes Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs, [2018] EWCA Civ 1185-- summary under Paragraph 4(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 4- Subsection 4(1)- Paragraph 4(1)(a) acquired business was segregated from its expanded component A British taxpayer (Leekes) carrying on a retail trade through four stores acquired, for nominal consideration, all the shares of another company (Coles) carrying on a similar retail trade through three stores, and then effectively wound-up Coles so as to carry on the operations of the three former Coles’ stores directly. ... They cannot refer to the enlarged trade carried on by Leekes, because that trade had never been carried on by Coles, and Coles cannot therefore be deemed to have continued to carry it on. … [I]t is necessary to ascribe a deemed continuity to the former trade of Coles, although it now forms part of the merged business carried on by Leekes, and relief may only be obtained if and to the extent that Leekes then derives trading income from the former Coles trade. ...

Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Anor, R (on the application of) v Commissioners for HMRC, [2016] UKSC 54-- summary under Principle of Legality Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Principle of Legality common law of confidentiality not overridden by general words A senior British tax official disclosed, in an “off the record” interview with some journalists, that the schemes of a particular promoter of film tax shelters had been generating large losses to the fisc, and they published this and other confidential information. HMRC argued that this disclosure was justified by a statutory provision which authorized a “disclosure … made for the purposes of a function” of HMRC, noting their “general desire to foster good relations with the media or to publicise HMRC’s views about elaborate tax avoidance schemes,” as well as to the possibility of getting tips from the journalists. ...

Skatteforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors, [2023] UKSC 40-- summary under Revenue Rule Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Revenue Rule revenue rule and sovereign authority rule did not apply where the foreign authority was suing to recover stolen money rather than to recover taxes The respondent, which was the Danish Customs and Tax Divisions (“SKAT”) brought claims in an English civil court seeking to recover £1.44 billion which it had paid based on allegedly fraudulent claims for refunds of Danish dividend withholding tax – SKAT alleged that most of the appellants (“Solo Capital”) had fraudulently misrepresented that they, as shareholders of Danish companies, had been subject to withholding at a rate in excess of the Treaty-reduced rate on dividends when, in fact, they never had held any shares in any of the relevant Danish companies. ...

Galea v The Assessment Review Committee & Anor (Mauritius), [2025] UKPC 17-- summary under Business Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Business deer-hunting activity was a business based on the taxpayer's subjective intention of generating a profit Whether the taxpayer could deduct his 92% share of the losses incurred by a Mauritius partnership (of which he was the dominant partner) from his other sources of income turned on whether the partnership was carrying on a “business,” whose definition in the Mauritian Income Tax Act 1995 relevantly referred to "any trade … or undertaking, or any other income earning activity, carried on with a view to profit. ...