Search - 司法拍卖网 人民法院

Hesler CJQ further dismissed the appellants claim that a Quebec regulation requiring retailers to verify, at the time of sale, the identity of a purchaser claiming to be an Indian, undercut the exclusive federal power over Indians, stating (at paras 100 & 112): …Notwithstanding s. 91(24), provincial laws of general application apply proprio vigore to Indians and Indian lands… …[T]he appellants’ failure to acknowledge or avail themselves of workable solutions does not render the budget measures unconstitutional… [T[heir refusal to participate more likely flows from a desire to preserve a competitive advantage than an inability to shoulder an excessive administrative burden. ...

. … The fact that that purchaser allows parts of the building…to be used without charge is of no importance…. ...

The Supreme Court further commented in discussing Olympia... and Impenco Ltd …: “If a specific provision exists which limits deductibility in respect of that purpose, then that should be the end of the matter.” ...

He stated: Section 16 of [bcIMC’s incorporating legislation] states that bcIMC “…is not liable for taxation except as the government is liable for taxation ”. ...

. … [T]he services in question are taxable because the law provides that unless specifically stipulated, GST and PST are not included in the gross price for the taxable goods or service. ...

., birth and death records) whose number was determined in accordance with parameters that were subject to change by the site – and with a significant number of the credits never being applied in the periods in question. ...

" … The petitions before me are directed exclusively at the interpretation of the Income Tax Act for the sole eventual purpose of determining whether there needs to be a remission to the Receiver General of the 25 per cent tax applicable to non‑residents under s. 116(5) of the ITA. ...

Before granting the application, Gascon J indicated that: "the expectation of privacy with respect to business records such as those targeted by the Unnamed Persons Requirement is very low" "PayPal has not filed any evidence to support a claim that the Unnamed Persons Requirement is overbroad or reaches a disproportionate number of persons or transactions" "the information sought in the Unnamed Persons Requirement is required in the context of verification activities undertaken in good faith by the Minister to combat the underground economy … to determine whether the Unnamed Persons have filed their required tax returns" ...

. … Profitable realisation of the investment by disposal was an objective of the investment by the RCF partnerships from the beginning. ...

The taxable activity in each case was an investment in … Talison Lithium which was carried out on their behalf by their respective General Partners. ...