Search - 司法拍卖网 人民法院

The respondent further argues if the Court holds that the $2,000,000 “ holding fee" is a "Canadian exploration expense” there was no liability in 1985 for such expense and the expense was not incurred by the limited partnership in respect of the drillship in the 1985 taxation year. ...

From this she concludes that from the beginning it was intended that all three lots be included in the " reserve". ...

Imaginamics, in tum, owned all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Bynamics Corporation (” Bynamics"). ...

He confirmed Exhibit A-25 which was a Summary of Farm & Employment Income between 1985 and 1989 but indicated there would be small differences in total. ...

Furthermore, the matter of the appellant's existing liability prior to the issue of the 1986 Order in respect of the maintenance payment that had fallen in arrears, was expressly dealt with in paragraph 3 of the 1986 Order which provides that, leaving out certain expletive words: ”... the arreas of maintenance as of May 31, 1986... are hereby fixed at $7,500.00.” ...

The firm was known as Robinson, Twigg, & Ketilson and in the first six months, he made only $5,000, whereas his partner made $19,000. ...

The word "business" is defined by the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles as ”... ...

Three days later the bank sent a firm of chartered accountants, Raymond, Chabot, Martin & Paré ("Raymond, Chabot”) to audit Process. ...

The remainder resulting from this subtraction was then integrated with the amounts added to the appellant's reported income in the reassessments issued on August 19, 1983 as follows: 1978 1979 1980 1981 Income Reported $41,488 $15,253 $ 5,667 $18,813 Reassessment August/83 9,762 35,784 4,498 6,356 Sub-Total 51,250 51,037 10,165 25,169 Adjustment per Net Worth (14,670) (23,468) 22,138 2,489 Income per Net Worth $36,580 $27,569 $32,303 $27,658 The bottom line in the above table was the amount used by the respondent as “total income" for purposes of issuing the notices of reassessment dated October 8, 1985 which are the assessments under appeal herein. ...

She was employed by Allied Communications and she had instructions from an agreement between McGuire & Koehli and Allied Communications to intercept calls. ...