Search - 司法拍卖网 人民法院

Bocock J concluded (at para. 35) that the “annual award was paid with the dominant characteristic of furtherance of the education and learning of … the PDF,” so that the PDF was not an employee. ...

Bocock J concluded (at para. 35) that the “annual award was paid with the dominant characteristic of furtherance of the education and learning of … the PDF,” so that the PDF was not an employee. ...

Section 259 … simply does not lay out any criteria for the exercise of the Minister’s power to designate an entity as a municipality. ...

What mattered at the time … was “the relationship of the person acquiring the [house] to the builder—one of purchase and sale—[…], not the relationship between co-purchasers” (Cheema at para. 94). ...

He stated (at paras. 21-22): … In statutory interpretation, there is a presumption of consistent expression, one part of which states different words have different meanings. ...

The submission of Zeifmans- that judicial authorization should have been obtained pursuant to s. 231.2(3) given that the requirement extended to the Unnamed Persons – was rejected essentially because there was “no evidence in the record that the Unnamed Persons [we]re a current investigation target.” ...

He then stated (at paras. 79-80): Although I will not issue an order that would require the Appellant, in response to any of the Disputed Questions, to disclose information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, I will note that … unless the Appellant furnishes the information in writing to the Respondent no later than ten days after this Appeal is set down for trial, the Appellant will require leave of the trial judge [under Rule 96(1)], in order to introduce that information at trial. ...

Preston, 2023 FCA 178-- summary under Onus Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Onus assumptions of mixed fact and law were not prejudicial to the taxpayer – and an FMV assumption instead is factual The Tax Court ordered that “assumptions of fact” pleaded by the Crown in its Reply should be struck out and moved to the reasons part of the Reply on the sole ground that they were in fact conclusions of mixed fact and law. ...

The Minister’s position was that LBL sold the tobacco products to such third-party customers who were not status Indians, with MacNaughton being compensated for her involvement in this scheme through volume rebates – so that such sales were not exempted under s. 87 of the Indian Act. ...

Unfortunately, s. 56(1)(u)(ii) deemed the ODSP payments to be the income of the higher-income spouse (herself) – so that on a literal reading of the combined effect of s. 122.62(5)(b) and s. 56(1)(u)(ii), her family income included not only her actual income but also the income attributed to her under s. 56(1)(u)(ii). ...