Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查

Results 61 - 70 of 789 for 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查
Decision summary

Jaft Corporation v. Canada (AG), 2014 DTC 5080 [at at 7056], 2014 MBQB 59 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Canada (AG), 2014 DTC 5080 [at at 7056], 2014 MBQB 59-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission attempt to rescind employment contracts, on the basis that employees had not satisfied scientific research & experimental development requirements, was retroactive tax-planning CRA had found that the applicant's research into solutions for Sick Building Syndrome based on air treatment qualified for scientific research and experimental development credits. ...
Decision summary

Slate Management Corporation v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ONSC 4216 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Slate Management Corporation v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 ONSC 4216-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission a generalized intent to achieve a s. 88(1)(d) bump was a sufficient basis to rectify in order to redo an amalgamation A purchaser (“SCC”) used a newly-formed AcquisitionCo (“GTA”) to acquire a Target (“HCC”). ... Hainey J noted (at para 13): [T]his is not a case in which tax planning has been done on a retroactive basis. ...
Decision summary

Re 5551928 Manitoba Ltd., 2018 BCSC 1482 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

., 2018 BCSC 1482-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission resolution for incorrectly calculated capital dividend rectified to reflect intention to clean-out CDA The petitioner, a Manitoba corporation with 24 shareholders, passed a resolution on November 20, 2015 that recited that “the company has a capital dividend account of the amount of $298,092”, declared a dividend in that amount “from the Company’s Capital Dividend Account pursuant to Subsection 83(2),” and directed the filing of a capital dividend election “in order to have the rules set forth in Subsection 83(2) apply to the full amount of the dividend.” ...
Decision summary

PepsiCo, Inc v Commissioner of Taxation, [2024] FCAFC 86 -- summary under Payment & Receipt

PepsiCo, Inc v Commissioner of Taxation, [2024] FCAFC 86-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt there can be no payment by direction unless there is an antecedent obligation by the creditor to the third party A U.S. company (PepsiCo) entered into an “exclusive bottling appointment” (“EBA”) with an independent Australian bottling company (the “Bottler”) pursuant to which an Australian subsidiary of PepsiCo (the “Seller”) sold concentrate to the Bottler and PepsiCo granted the Bottler the right to use the Pepsi and Mountain Dew trademarks in connection with its sales of the soft drinks. Before finding that the payments made by the Bottler to the Seller were not derived by PepsiCo, so that the latter could not be subject to the Australian withholding tax on trademark royalties paid to a non-resident, Perram and Jackman JJ stated (at para. 40): It is well established that a direction by a creditor to a debtor to pay a third party constitutes a payment to the creditor. Nevertheless, it is also recognised that there can be no payment by direction unless there is an antecedent monetary obligation owed by the Bottler to PepsiCo/SVC…. ...
Decision summary

Pyxis Real Estate Equities Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 ONCA 65 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Canada (Attorney General), 2025 ONCA 65-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission capital dividends were agreed to be paid in amounts that overlooked a CDA deficit: no rectification A plan was implemented for successive capital dividends to be paid up a chain of corporations so that the individual who was the ultimate shareholder could have a tax-free receipt of $1.4 million. ... …The corporate resolutions that were signed accurately reflect the agreement. ...
Decision summary

Attorney General of Canada v. Juliar, 2000 DTC 6589, 50 OR (3d) 728, 2000 CanLII 16883 (Ont CA) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Juliar, 2000 DTC 6589, 50 OR (3d) 728, 2000 CanLII 16883 (Ont CA)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission The Court confirmed the decision of the trial judge, to rectify an agreement for the transfer by the appellants of half the shares of a company to a newly-incorporated holding company so as to reflect consideration that was treasury shares of the holding company rather than promissory notes, on the basis of the trial judge's finding that "the true agreement between the parties here was the acquisition of the half interest... in a manner that would not attract immediate liability for income tax" and a finding that the parties would have chosen to receive shares but for the mistaken belief of the advising accountant that the transferred shares had full cost base. ...
Decision summary

TCR Holding Corp. v. Ontario, [2010] O.J. No. 1238, 2010 ONCA 233 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

No. 1238, 2010 ONCA 233-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission corporation included in amalgamation based on mistake The applicant resulted from several corporations being amalgamated in order that the tax losses of some of the predecessor corporations could be accessed. ...
Decision summary

McPeake v. Canada, 2012 DTC 5042 [at at 6770], 2012 BCSC 132 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Canada, 2012 DTC 5042 [at at 6770], 2012 BCSC 132-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission 2nd rectification to avoid s. 75(2) taint The petitioners were trustees of a family trust which had been formed in order to permit capital gains on any subsequent sale of the shares of the private company with which the trust had been settled to be allocated amongst the children beneficiaries, thereby multiplying the utilization of the capital gains exemption. ...
Decision summary

Aim Funds Management Inc. v. Aim Trimark Corporate Class Inc., [2009] O.J. No. 4798, [2009] GSTC 170, 64 DLR (4th) 261, 2009 CanLII 29491 (Ont. Sup. Ct. J.) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

.)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission The Minister assessed the applicant, a mutual fund manager, on the basis that a payment to it by mutual funds of deferred sale charges received by the mutual funds from redeeming investors represented consideration for taxable supplies of services made by the applicant to the mutual funds. ...
Decision summary

771225 Ontario Inc. v. Bramco Holdings Co. (1995), 21 OR (3d) 739 (CA), aff'g (1994), 17 OR (3d) 571 (Gen Div) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Bramco Holdings Co. (1995), 21 OR (3d) 739 (CA), aff'g (1994), 17 OR (3d) 571 (Gen Div)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission rewriting fiscal history Ontario farm lands were transferred to a non-resident corporation for the purpose of utilizing losses of that corporation. ...

Pages