Search - 制暴无限杀机 下载

The Queen, 2014 TCC 368-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission Superior Court nullification of investment contracts did not nullify RRSP withdrawals The two taxpayers, who had been CN employees, were convinced by two promoters (the Lavignes) to transfer all the funds in their CN pension plans to self-directed RRSPs managed by the Lavignes, with most of the funds being lost. ... In finding that this judgment did not render the amounts withdrawn from the RRSPs non-taxable, Jorré J stated (paras. 39-40, TaxInterpretations translation): [T]he Superior Court recognized that the appellants had received the two amounts in question, as they were deducted from the amount invested in the calculation of the amount which the Superior Court ordered the defendants to pay to the appellant. … Consequently, the nullification pronounced by the Superior Court does not change the fact that the appellants received the amounts…in question and that they were amounts withdrawn from their respective RRSPs. ...

The Queen, 2011 DTC 1216 [at at 1274], 2011 TCC 289-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt payment through back-to-back promissory notes In settlement of a suit by the taxpayer, who was an income beneficiary, the settlement agreement provided for the payment by the trust to her of $1.7 million in satisfaction of her interest in the trust. ...

The Queen, 2011 DTC 1117 [at at 628], 2011 TCC 148, aff'd 2012 DTC 5138 [at 7292], 2012 FCA 214 supra-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt no implied set-off The taxpayer acquired a 100% undivided interest in a property (the "Quarter Claim") adjoining its "Golden Giant" mine subject to a 50% net profits royalty in favour of the vendor ("Teck/Corona"). ...

The Queen, 2016 TCC 43, rev'd 2017 FCA 39-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission foreign rectification orders are not binding on the Tax Court (but can be given weight) The taxpayer’s Barbado and Cyprus subsidiaries paid amounts to the taxpayer in 2004, 2005 and 2006 as dividends and then, following CRA proposals to assess the dividends, obtained rectification orders from the applicable Barbados and Cyprus courts declaring that the amounts instead were loans to it (or otherwise gave rise to indebtedness). ...

The Queen, 2019 TCC 6-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission a rectification judgment was “justifiably obtained” and, therefore, followed for tax purposes On April 15, 2002, the taxpayer signed an agreement for the purchase of shares of a real estate corporation (“Quatre Saisons”) that stated that the purchase price was to be satisfied by the payment to the vendor (“Placeval,” a corporation owned by a Mr. ... Before granting the taxpayer’s appeal from the assessment, Favreau J stated (at paras. 55, 59-60, 62): [T]he judgment of the Superior Court is not binding on the respondent as neither the Attorney General of Canada nor the Minister was involved in the application. … Although the judgment of the Superior Court is not binding on the respondent and is not res judicata, the conduct of the parties, both before and after the concluding of the transaction, clearly demonstrates their true intention to purchase and sell the shares of Quatre Saisons for nominal consideration and not for consideration based on the future sales of lots. ... The financial statements of Quatre Saisons for its fiscal years ending on March 31 of 2003, 2004 and 2005, also reflected the commissions paid in the cost of the sales of the lots. … [I]t is evident that the agreement, as reduced to writing, contained drafting errors of material importance …. ...

., 99 DTC 537, [1999] 3 CTC 2123 (TCC)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development Two projects for the development of a system for recycling sludge or dealing more economically with the disposition of waste chemicals did not evidence a type of uncertainty that could not be removed by standard engineering practice and routine development and, accordingly, did not qualify. ...

The Queen, 2000 DTC 2353 (TCC)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development McArthur TCJ found (at p. 2360): "What the Appellant did was take existing technology computer hardware and PacRat software, and record personal messages that cannot be understood or tested by anyone else but [its principal]. ...

The Queen, 97 DTC 684, [1997] 1 CTC 2256 (TCC)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development The taxpayer was found not to be engaged in SR&ED given that the only tests conducted by it in the year in question was testing of devices already on the market that had been designed from technologies developed in the United States. ...

The Queen, 2009 DTC 687, 2009 TCC 190-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development The taxpayer in carrying out work largely under the supervision of a researcher who was not its employee or representative, and in testing the effectiveness of products that had already been commercially developed, did not qualify for deduction as SR&ED. ...

The Queen, 2005 DTC 457, 2004 TCC 341-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development Work carried out by the taxpayers to improve the performance of a tactometer represented "routine techniques and standard procedures generally accessible to competent professionals in the field" (p. 461), and did not qualify as SR&ED. ...