Search - 制暴无限杀机 下载
Results 23441 - 23450 of 23470 for 制暴无限杀机 下载
FCTD
Emerson Electric Canada Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1997] 2 CTC 177
Indian Head School Division 19 ® [30] in ascertaining the existence and extent of the duty of fairness owed to those affected by a decision, a strong argument can be made in this instance that the Applicant was entitled to state its views before the Minister could hold that its imports were no longer eligible for remission. ...
TCC
Walters v. R.|, [1999] 1 CTC 2211, 99 DTC 363
Exhibit A-l contained a number of documents relative to the operation in question and Exhibit A-2 was a summary of the profit and loss situation for M & K Stables from 1975 to 1992. ...
FCTD
Johnston Family 1991 Trust v. Minister of National Revenue, [1999] 4 CTC 75, 99 DTC 5508
Johnston states that either on March 29 or March 30, he caused the three beneficiaries, (his wife & two children, who at the time were four and five years of age) to execute the elections. ...
FCTD
Her Majesty the Queen v. Cadboro Bay Holdings LTD, [1977] CTC 186, 77 DTC 5115
Subsection 125(1) of the Income Tax Act reads as follows: Small Business Deduction 125. (1) There may be deducted from the tax otherwise payable under this Part for a taxation year by a corporation that was, throughout the year, a Canadian-controlled private corporation, an amount equal to 25% of the least of (a) the amount, if any, by which (i) the aggregate of all amounts each of which is the income of the corporation for the year from an active business carried on in Canada, exceeds (ii) the aggregate of all amounts each of which is a loss of the corporation for the year from an active business carried on in Canada, (b) the amount, if any, by which the corporation’s taxable income for the year exceeds the aggregate of (i) 10/4 of the aggregate of amounts deducted under subsection 126(1) from the tax for the year otherwise payable by it under this Part, and (ii) 2 times the aggregate of amounts deducted under subsection 126(2) from the tax for the year otherwise payable by it under this Part, (c) the corporation’s business limit for the year, and (d) the amount, if any, by which the corporation’s total business limit for the year exceeds its cumulative deduction account at the end of the immediately preceding taxation year, except that in applying this section for a taxation year after the 1972 taxation year, the reference in this subsection to “25%” shall be read as a reference to “24% for the 1973 taxation year, “23% for the 1974 taxation year, “22%’’ for the 1975 taxation year, and “21 %” for the 1976 and subsequent taxation years. ...
T Rev B decision
Henry L Molot v. Minister of National Revenue, [1977] CTC 2170, 77 DTC 111
”’... Here is a full-time professor at Ottawa University, he spends 30 or 40 hours a week in the building, he has an office, he has a secretary, if you look him up in the Ottawa University phone book, his phone number is in there, he’s a member of the pension plan, a member of the faculty union. ...
T Rev B decision
Donald G Wilson Et Al v. Minister of National Revenue, [1974] CTC 2219
He said: “! considered it a 15- to 20-year proposition before it would be good.” ...
FCTD
Produits LDG Products Inc v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 273, 73 DTC 5222
Until further notice the Trustees of the Plan shall be those named in an Agreement dated February 26th 1965 — between the company and the Trustees. ...
FCTD
Minister of National Revenue v. Muzly Lawee and Naima E Lawee, [1972] CTC 359, 72 DTC 6342
There is one minor exception — Muzly Lawee acquired a 17 /2% interest in land bought by Ezra Lawee and Sossoon Abed in St Laurent in conjunction with them and two of her daughters. ...
EC decision
Sensibar Dredging Corporation Ltd. And Construction Aggregates Corporation v. Minister of National Revenue, [1967] CTC 298, 67 DTC 5212
Davie & Sons Ltd. to dismantle, remove and rebuild the dredge for an amount somewhat in excess of $340,000. ...
FCTD
Minister of National Revenue v. Smith, [1975] C.T.C. 335, 75 D.T.C. 6291, 75 D.T.C. 5242
Price, Waterhouse & Co., Chartered Accountants disclosed that after paying the liabilities of Wenonah (including a debt of $367,858.10 owing to the deceased) there were available for distribution to the shareholders on the dissolution of Wenonah assets having a market value of $117,977.71 (which calculation is based on the valuation of a residential property owned by Wenonah at $102,000.00 being the appraised value of such property in 1967 when Wenonah acquired the said property), of which pursuant to the Letters Patent of Wenonah the estate of the Deceased as the beneficial owner of 2,000 Class B shares was entitled to receive $2,000.00 and the holders of the Class A shares were entitled to receive the balance of $115,977.71. 18. ...